SM vs CLF
Comparison between SM Energy Company (SM, Company) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company).
SM is from the Energy sector, while CLF is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSM has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +11.0% compared to -7.6%
SM vs CLF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SM vs CLF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SM vs CLF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SM | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +61.89% | -0.11% |
| 2025 | -51.47% | +39.20% |
| 2024 | +1.24% | -52.45% |
| 2023 | +23.24% | +21.62% |
| 2022 | +10.45% | -25.86% |
| 2021 | +363.97% | +50.97% |
| 2020 | -44.67% | +88.69% |
| 2019 | -26.03% | +10.16% |
| 2018 | -33.18% | -2.66% |
| 2017 | -35.30% | -16.26% |
| 2016 | +73.27% | +403.59% |
| 2015 | -48.64% | -77.52% |
| 2014 | -53.20% | -71.27% |
| 2013 | +52.35% | -30.80% |
| 2012 | -31.45% | -38.56% |
| 2011 | +21.34% | -23.00% |
| 2010 | +63.50% | +63.25% |
| 2009 | +56.80% | +57.60% |
| 2008 | -48.20% | -46.54% |
| 2007 | +10.56% | +112.27% |
| 2006 | -4.22% | +5.86% |
| 2005 | +82.35% | +76.79% |
| 2004 | +44.17% | +95.85% |
| 2003 | +11.53% | +147.09% |
| 2002 | +16.86% | +7.53% |
| 2001 | -30.19% | -14.70% |
| 2000 | +185.26% | -24.00% |
| 1999 | -0.33% | +8.53% |
SM vs CLF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current SM drawdown is -62.11%. The current CLF drawdown is -86.11%.
| Rank | SM | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.85% Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 |
| #2 | -82.05% Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 |
| #3 | -57.19% Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 |
| #4 | -51.83% Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 |
| #5 | -31.07% Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 |
| #6 | -30.27% Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 |
| #7 | -29.50% Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #8 | -24.07% Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 |
| #9 | -22.46% Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 |
| #10 | -21.62% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 |
| #11 | -19.66% Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 |
| #12 | -18.80% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 |
| #13 | -18.52% Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 |
| #14 | -16.88% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 |
| #15 | -16.26% Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between SM and CLF is 0.59 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SM vs CLF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SM | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.72% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 5.35% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 1.91% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 1.55% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 0.46% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 0.33% | 0.82% |
| 2019 | 0.89% | 3.10% |
| 2018 | 0.65% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.45% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 0.29% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 0.51% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.26% | 8.40% |
| 2013 | 0.12% | 2.29% |
| 2012 | 0.19% | 5.59% |
| 2011 | 0.14% | 1.35% |
| 2010 | 0.17% | 0.65% |
| 2009 | 0.29% | 0.55% |
| 2008 | 0.49% | 1.37% |
| 2007 | 0.26% | 0.50% |
| 2006 | 0.27% | 0.98% |
| 2005 | 0.27% | 0.68% |
| 2004 | 0.24% | 0.19% |
| 2003 | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.40% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.47% | 2.19% |
| 2000 | 0.32% | 6.96% |
| 1999 | 0.20% | 1.21% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks