StockComparison Logo
vs

SM vs CLF

Comparison between SM Energy Company (SM, Company) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company).

SM is from the Energy sector, while CLF is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceSM has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +11.0% compared to -7.6%

SM vs CLF - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
SM
$7.34B
CLF
$7.33B
Max Drawdown
Winner
SM
98.88%
CLF
98.94%
Sharpe Ratio
SM
0.81
Winner
CLF
1.26
5Y Beta
Winner
SM
1.18
CLF
1.92
Industry
SM
Oil & Gas E&p
CLF
Steel
P/E Ratio
SM
48.20
Winner
CLF
-5.52
Forward P/E
Winner
SM
4.49
CLF
29.67
Dividend Yield
SM
2.43%
CLF
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
SM
119.54%
CLF
-6.01%
5Y EPS CAGR
SM
N/A
CLF
81.08%
Debt to Equity
Winner
SM
0.00%
CLF
133.34%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
SM
29.53%
CLF
-13.61%

SM vs CLF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
SM
-1.67%
Winner
CLF
+32.54%
3M
Winner
SM
+28.03%
CLF
+19.17%
6M
Winner
SM
+64.33%
CLF
+4.18%
1Y
SM
+33.79%
Winner
CLF
+130.25%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
SM
+11.01%
CLF
-7.55%
10Y(CAGR)
SM
+1.26%
Winner
CLF
+16.66%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
SM
+6.89%
CLF
+6.39%

SM vs CLF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearSMCLF
2026+61.89%-0.11%
2025-51.47%+39.20%
2024+1.24%-52.45%
2023+23.24%+21.62%
2022+10.45%-25.86%
2021+363.97%+50.97%
2020-44.67%+88.69%
2019-26.03%+10.16%
2018-33.18%-2.66%
2017-35.30%-16.26%
2016+73.27%+403.59%
2015-48.64%-77.52%
2014-53.20%-71.27%
2013+52.35%-30.80%
2012-31.45%-38.56%
2011+21.34%-23.00%
2010+63.50%+63.25%
2009+56.80%+57.60%
2008-48.20%-46.54%
2007+10.56%+112.27%
2006-4.22%+5.86%
2005+82.35%+76.79%
2004+44.17%+95.85%
2003+11.53%+147.09%
2002+16.86%+7.53%
2001-30.19%-14.70%
2000+185.26%-24.00%
1999-0.33%+8.53%

SM vs CLF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current SM drawdown is -62.11%. The current CLF drawdown is -86.11%.

RankSMCLF
#1-98.85%
Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020
-98.78%
Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016
#2-82.05%
Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011
-51.61%
Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002
#3-57.19%
Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004
-48.31%
Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003
#4-51.83%
Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013
-41.76%
Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004
#5-31.07%
Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011
-41.09%
Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007
#6-30.27%
Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000
-38.96%
Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005
#7-29.50%
Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008
-32.10%
Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
#8-24.07%
Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000
-27.95%
Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007
#9-22.46%
Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000
-21.75%
Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004
#10-21.62%
Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001
-20.24%
Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004
#11-19.66%
Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011
-18.57%
Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008
#12-18.80%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005
-17.14%
Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008
#13-18.52%
Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006
-16.03%
Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005
#14-16.88%
Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005
-12.12%
Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008
#15-16.26%
Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000
-11.79%
Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007

Correlation

Correlation between SM and CLF is 0.59 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.59
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

SM vs CLF dividend yield comparison.

YearSMCLF
20260.72%0.00%
20255.35%0.00%
20241.91%0.00%
20231.55%0.00%
20220.46%0.00%
20210.07%0.00%
20200.33%0.82%
20190.89%3.10%
20180.65%0.00%
20170.45%0.00%
20160.29%0.00%
20150.51%0.00%
20140.26%8.40%
20130.12%2.29%
20120.19%5.59%
20110.14%1.35%
20100.17%0.65%
20090.29%0.55%
20080.49%1.37%
20070.26%0.50%
20060.27%0.98%
20050.27%0.68%
20040.24%0.19%
20030.35%0.00%
20020.40%0.00%
20010.47%2.19%
20000.32%6.96%
19990.20%1.21%

Select Stocks to Compare