CLF vs STAG
Comparison between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company) and STAG Industrial Inc (STAG, Company).
CLF is from the Basic Materials sector, while STAG is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceSTAG has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +5.2% compared to -7.6%
CLF vs STAG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CLF vs STAG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CLF vs STAG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CLF | STAG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.11% | +3.68% |
| 2025 | +39.20% | +16.10% |
| 2024 | -52.45% | -11.11% |
| 2023 | +21.62% | +26.54% |
| 2022 | -25.86% | -28.26% |
| 2021 | +50.97% | +64.10% |
| 2020 | +88.69% | +5.35% |
| 2019 | +10.16% | +36.75% |
| 2018 | -2.66% | -3.01% |
| 2017 | -16.26% | +21.51% |
| 2016 | +403.59% | +39.68% |
| 2015 | -77.52% | -20.05% |
| 2014 | -71.27% | +28.62% |
| 2013 | -30.80% | +18.29% |
| 2012 | -38.56% | +62.04% |
| 2011 | -23.00% | -0.16% |
| 2010 | +63.25% | N/A |
| 2009 | +57.60% | N/A |
| 2008 | -46.54% | N/A |
| 2007 | +112.27% | N/A |
| 2006 | +5.86% | N/A |
| 2005 | +76.79% | N/A |
| 2004 | +95.85% | N/A |
| 2003 | +147.09% | N/A |
| 2002 | +7.53% | N/A |
| 2001 | -14.70% | N/A |
| 2000 | -24.00% | N/A |
| 1999 | +8.53% | N/A |
CLF vs STAG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for STAG was -45.07%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 116 trading sessions.
The current CLF drawdown is -86.11%. The current STAG drawdown is -5.80%.
| Rank | CLF | STAG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 | -45.07% Feb 12, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020 |
| #2 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 | -42.23% Dec 31, 2021 - Oct 10, 2022 |
| #3 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 | -40.47% Jan 27, 2015 - Jul 19, 2016 |
| #4 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 | -23.70% Jul 7, 2011 - Jan 26, 2012 |
| #5 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 | -20.62% Nov 21, 2017 - Jul 6, 2018 |
| #6 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 | -20.05% May 16, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 |
| #7 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -18.33% Aug 20, 2018 - Feb 11, 2019 |
| #8 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 | -15.85% Jun 6, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014 |
| #9 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 | -13.90% Jul 29, 2016 - Feb 21, 2017 |
| #10 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 | -12.03% Aug 7, 2020 - Mar 12, 2021 |
| #11 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 | -10.99% May 10, 2012 - Jun 19, 2012 |
| #12 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 | -10.42% Jun 20, 2019 - Oct 30, 2019 |
| #13 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 | -9.02% Sep 3, 2021 - Oct 18, 2021 |
| #14 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 | -7.94% Apr 2, 2012 - May 8, 2012 |
| #15 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 | -7.40% Mar 2, 2017 - Apr 11, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between CLF and STAG is -0.34 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CLF vs STAG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CLF | STAG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.02% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 4.05% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 4.37% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 3.74% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 4.52% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 3.02% |
| 2020 | 0.82% | 4.60% |
| 2019 | 3.10% | 4.53% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 5.71% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 5.14% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 5.82% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 7.40% |
| 2014 | 8.40% | 5.27% |
| 2013 | 2.29% | 5.89% |
| 2012 | 5.59% | 5.95% |
| 2011 | 1.35% | 6.36% |
| 2010 | 0.65% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.55% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.98% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.68% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.19% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.19% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.96% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks