SLYG vs CMF
Comparison between SPDR(R) S & P 600 SMALL CAP GROWTH ETF (SLYG, ETF) and ISHARES CALIFORNIA MUNI BOND ETF (CMF, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceSLYG has outperformed CMF, delivering a return of +5.6% compared to +0.6%
SLYG vs CMF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SLYG vs CMF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SLYG vs CMF - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SLYG | CMF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +14.91% | +0.58% |
| 2025 | +5.20% | +3.22% |
| 2024 | +10.41% | +1.78% |
| 2023 | +17.58% | +5.24% |
| 2022 | -21.72% | -8.18% |
| 2021 | +23.42% | +0.77% |
| 2020 | +19.17% | +4.50% |
| 2019 | +21.07% | +7.01% |
| 2018 | -4.60% | +0.92% |
| 2017 | +14.06% | +4.69% |
| 2016 | +25.62% | -0.37% |
| 2015 | +3.46% | +3.00% |
| 2014 | +5.38% | +10.66% |
| 2013 | +38.68% | -3.23% |
| 2012 | +13.24% | +7.34% |
| 2011 | +1.63% | +15.75% |
| 2010 | +27.13% | -2.55% |
| 2009 | +43.56% | +8.14% |
| 2008 | -40.18% | +0.64% |
| 2007 | +7.94% | +1.37% |
| 2006 | +11.47% | N/A |
| 2005 | +10.60% | N/A |
| 2004 | +14.91% | N/A |
| 2003 | +43.67% | N/A |
| 2002 | -38.57% | N/A |
| 2001 | -4.25% | N/A |
| 2000 | -17.74% | N/A |
SLYG vs CMF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SLYG was -62.15%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 1591 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CMF was -16.45%, occurring on Jun 10, 2015. Recovery took 1295 trading sessions.
The current SLYG drawdown is -0.50%. The current CMF drawdown is -1.23%.
| Rank | SLYG | CMF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -62.15% Oct 2, 2000 - Feb 2, 2007 | -16.45% Dec 26, 2014 - Feb 20, 2020 |
| #2 | -59.44% Oct 10, 2007 - Dec 2, 2010 | -14.57% Mar 9, 2020 - Jul 16, 2020 |
| #3 | -41.85% Aug 31, 2018 - Nov 16, 2020 | -13.25% May 21, 2008 - Jan 7, 2009 |
| #4 | -29.17% Nov 8, 2021 - Jul 16, 2024 | -12.46% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 18, 2025 |
| #5 | -27.39% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 14, 2026 | -11.65% Sep 1, 2010 - Aug 2, 2011 |
| #6 | -26.29% Jul 7, 2011 - Mar 19, 2012 | -10.57% Nov 30, 2012 - Apr 10, 2014 |
| #7 | -19.38% Jun 22, 2015 - Jul 12, 2016 | -5.15% Jan 22, 2008 - May 21, 2008 |
| #8 | -12.39% Jul 3, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014 | -4.75% Apr 27, 2009 - Aug 17, 2009 |
| #9 | -10.71% Sep 14, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013 | -4.19% Sep 24, 2009 - Apr 27, 2010 |
| #10 | -10.41% Jul 13, 2007 - Oct 3, 2007 | -3.80% Apr 18, 2012 - Sep 28, 2012 |
| #11 | -9.99% Mar 26, 2012 - Sep 4, 2012 | -3.05% Jan 14, 2009 - Feb 9, 2009 |
| #12 | -9.34% Jul 31, 2024 - Oct 16, 2024 | -2.91% Feb 27, 2026 - Mar 24, 2026 |
| #13 | -9.22% Sep 22, 2016 - Nov 11, 2016 | -2.89% Sep 22, 2011 - Dec 8, 2011 |
| #14 | -9.10% Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026 | -2.72% Feb 11, 2009 - Mar 24, 2009 |
| #15 | -8.77% Mar 18, 2014 - Jul 1, 2014 | -2.18% Feb 12, 2021 - Jun 11, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between SLYG and CMF is 0.92 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
SLYG vs CMF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SLYG | CMF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.16% | 0.98% |
| 2025 | 0.86% | 2.94% |
| 2024 | 1.22% | 2.78% |
| 2023 | 1.18% | 2.29% |
| 2022 | 1.18% | 1.91% |
| 2021 | 0.68% | 1.58% |
| 2020 | 0.71% | 1.80% |
| 2019 | 1.08% | 2.03% |
| 2018 | 1.06% | 2.17% |
| 2017 | 4.74% | 2.09% |
| 2016 | 1.13% | 2.21% |
| 2015 | 5.75% | 2.55% |
| 2014 | 4.42% | 2.80% |
| 2013 | 0.61% | 3.12% |
| 2012 | 1.40% | 3.08% |
| 2011 | 0.69% | 3.66% |
| 2010 | 0.27% | 4.19% |
| 2009 | 0.41% | 3.77% |
| 2008 | 1.04% | 3.52% |
| 2007 | 1.83% | 0.82% |
| 2006 | 0.14% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.48% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.20% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks