CMF vs ILF
Comparison between ISHARES CALIFORNIA MUNI BOND ETF (CMF, ETF) and ISHARES LATIN AMERICA 40 ETF (ILF, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceILF has outperformed CMF, delivering a return of +8.8% compared to +0.7%
CMF vs ILF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CMF vs ILF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CMF vs ILF - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CMF | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.14% | +10.11% |
| 2025 | +3.22% | +51.14% |
| 2024 | +1.78% | -22.04% |
| 2023 | +5.24% | +39.42% |
| 2022 | -8.18% | +10.78% |
| 2021 | +0.77% | -13.42% |
| 2020 | +4.50% | -13.86% |
| 2019 | +7.01% | +8.55% |
| 2018 | +0.92% | -9.62% |
| 2017 | +6.37% | +22.96% |
| 2016 | +1.78% | +35.67% |
| 2015 | +5.68% | -29.60% |
| 2014 | +13.86% | -9.26% |
| 2013 | -0.24% | -14.14% |
| 2012 | +10.71% | +2.87% |
| 2011 | +20.28% | -19.20% |
| 2010 | +1.29% | +11.86% |
| 2009 | +12.33% | +81.68% |
| 2008 | +4.20% | -44.59% |
| 2007 | +2.20% | +56.21% |
| 2006 | N/A | +46.27% |
| 2005 | N/A | +65.69% |
| 2004 | N/A | +42.70% |
| 2003 | N/A | +67.81% |
| 2002 | N/A | -14.95% |
| 2001 | N/A | +17.86% |
CMF vs ILF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CMF was -15.91%, occurring on Dec 29, 2014. Recovery took 1070 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ILF was -66.23%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 724 trading sessions.
The current CMF drawdown is -0.68%. The current ILF drawdown is -10.90%.
| Rank | CMF | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -15.91% Dec 26, 2014 - Mar 29, 2019 | -66.23% May 19, 2008 - Apr 1, 2011 |
| #2 | -14.57% Mar 9, 2020 - Jul 16, 2020 | -63.80% Apr 5, 2011 - Nov 7, 2025 |
| #3 | -12.78% Sep 11, 2008 - Nov 5, 2008 | -41.99% Apr 17, 2002 - Sep 2, 2003 |
| #4 | -12.46% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 18, 2025 | -29.84% May 9, 2006 - Nov 29, 2006 |
| #5 | -10.76% Oct 8, 2010 - May 16, 2011 | -22.76% Apr 5, 2004 - Sep 16, 2004 |
| #6 | -9.53% May 20, 2013 - Jan 17, 2014 | -22.25% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007 |
| #7 | -7.09% Nov 6, 2008 - Jan 5, 2009 | -15.55% Dec 26, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008 |
| #8 | -4.86% Jan 22, 2008 - Apr 11, 2008 | -14.91% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 24, 2007 |
| #9 | -4.03% May 6, 2009 - Aug 11, 2009 | -13.94% Apr 14, 2026 - Jun 8, 2026 |
| #10 | -3.88% Dec 5, 2012 - Mar 1, 2013 | -13.37% Mar 7, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005 |
| #11 | -3.80% Apr 18, 2012 - Aug 1, 2012 | -12.76% Feb 14, 2007 - Apr 3, 2007 |
| #12 | -3.78% Oct 7, 2009 - Mar 2, 2010 | -12.67% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 10, 2026 |
| #13 | -3.68% May 21, 2008 - Sep 3, 2008 | -12.59% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 17, 2005 |
| #14 | -3.05% Jan 14, 2009 - Feb 9, 2009 | -12.23% Feb 27, 2008 - Apr 16, 2008 |
| #15 | -2.91% Feb 27, 2026 - Mar 24, 2026 | -8.83% Mar 1, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004 |
Correlation
Correlation between CMF and ILF is -0.05 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)
CMF vs ILF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CMF | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.22% | 1.31% |
| 2025 | 2.94% | 4.39% |
| 2024 | 2.78% | 7.44% |
| 2023 | 2.29% | 4.61% |
| 2022 | 1.91% | 12.72% |
| 2021 | 1.58% | 8.47% |
| 2020 | 1.80% | 1.88% |
| 2019 | 2.03% | 3.09% |
| 2018 | 2.17% | 3.12% |
| 2017 | 3.67% | 1.80% |
| 2016 | 4.42% | 1.59% |
| 2015 | 5.11% | 3.25% |
| 2014 | 5.61% | 2.32% |
| 2013 | 6.23% | 3.32% |
| 2012 | 6.16% | 2.59% |
| 2011 | 7.33% | 3.30% |
| 2010 | 8.39% | 2.18% |
| 2009 | 7.54% | 1.57% |
| 2008 | 7.03% | 12.53% |
| 2007 | 1.63% | 6.97% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 9.59% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 6.88% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 5.83% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 6.31% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 12.59% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.79% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks