CMF vs ILF
Comparison between ISHARES CALIFORNIA MUNI BOND ETF (CMF, ETF) and ISHARES LATIN AMERICA 40 ETF (ILF, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceILF has outperformed CMF, delivering a return of +11.7% compared to +0.6%
CMF vs ILF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CMF vs ILF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CMF vs ILF - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CMF | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.58% | +18.16% |
| 2025 | +3.22% | +51.14% |
| 2024 | +1.78% | -22.04% |
| 2023 | +5.24% | +39.42% |
| 2022 | -8.18% | +10.78% |
| 2021 | +0.77% | -13.42% |
| 2020 | +4.50% | -13.86% |
| 2019 | +7.01% | +8.55% |
| 2018 | +0.92% | -9.62% |
| 2017 | +4.69% | +22.96% |
| 2016 | -0.37% | +35.67% |
| 2015 | +3.00% | -29.60% |
| 2014 | +10.66% | -9.26% |
| 2013 | -3.23% | -14.14% |
| 2012 | +7.34% | +2.87% |
| 2011 | +15.75% | -19.20% |
| 2010 | -2.55% | +11.86% |
| 2009 | +8.14% | +81.68% |
| 2008 | +0.64% | -46.65% |
| 2007 | +1.37% | +48.27% |
| 2006 | N/A | +35.75% |
| 2005 | N/A | +57.21% |
| 2004 | N/A | +36.32% |
| 2003 | N/A | +59.61% |
| 2002 | N/A | -22.32% |
| 2001 | N/A | +15.28% |
CMF vs ILF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CMF was -16.45%, occurring on Jun 10, 2015. Recovery took 1295 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ILF was -67.48%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 4399 trading sessions.
The current CMF drawdown is -1.23%. The current ILF drawdown is -4.38%.
| Rank | CMF | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -16.45% Dec 26, 2014 - Feb 20, 2020 | -67.48% May 19, 2008 - Nov 11, 2025 |
| #2 | -14.57% Mar 9, 2020 - Jul 16, 2020 | -41.99% Apr 17, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 |
| #3 | -13.25% May 21, 2008 - Jan 7, 2009 | -29.84% May 9, 2006 - Nov 29, 2006 |
| #4 | -12.46% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 18, 2025 | -22.76% Apr 5, 2004 - Sep 16, 2004 |
| #5 | -11.65% Sep 1, 2010 - Aug 2, 2011 | -22.25% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007 |
| #6 | -10.57% Nov 30, 2012 - Apr 10, 2014 | -17.62% Oct 31, 2007 - Feb 25, 2008 |
| #7 | -5.15% Jan 22, 2008 - May 21, 2008 | -13.37% Mar 7, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005 |
| #8 | -4.75% Apr 27, 2009 - Aug 17, 2009 | -12.76% Feb 14, 2007 - Apr 3, 2007 |
| #9 | -4.19% Sep 24, 2009 - Apr 27, 2010 | -12.67% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 10, 2026 |
| #10 | -3.80% Apr 18, 2012 - Sep 28, 2012 | -12.59% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 17, 2005 |
| #11 | -3.05% Jan 14, 2009 - Feb 9, 2009 | -12.23% Feb 27, 2008 - Apr 16, 2008 |
| #12 | -2.91% Feb 27, 2026 - Mar 24, 2026 | -8.83% Mar 1, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004 |
| #13 | -2.89% Sep 22, 2011 - Dec 8, 2011 | -8.33% Jan 26, 2004 - Mar 1, 2004 |
| #14 | -2.72% Feb 11, 2009 - Mar 24, 2009 | -8.19% Mar 3, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006 |
| #15 | -2.18% Feb 12, 2021 - Jun 11, 2021 | -7.04% Apr 21, 2008 - May 5, 2008 |
Correlation
Correlation between CMF and ILF is -0.06 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)
CMF vs ILF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CMF | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.98% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 2.94% | 4.39% |
| 2024 | 2.78% | 7.44% |
| 2023 | 2.29% | 4.61% |
| 2022 | 1.91% | 12.72% |
| 2021 | 1.58% | 8.47% |
| 2020 | 1.80% | 1.88% |
| 2019 | 2.03% | 3.09% |
| 2018 | 2.17% | 3.12% |
| 2017 | 2.09% | 1.80% |
| 2016 | 2.21% | 1.59% |
| 2015 | 2.55% | 3.25% |
| 2014 | 2.80% | 2.32% |
| 2013 | 3.12% | 3.32% |
| 2012 | 3.08% | 2.59% |
| 2011 | 3.66% | 3.30% |
| 2010 | 4.19% | 2.18% |
| 2009 | 3.77% | 1.57% |
| 2008 | 3.52% | 4.23% |
| 2007 | 0.82% | 1.39% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.38% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.26% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.52% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.56% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks