StockComparison Logo
vs

SCI vs UMBF

Comparison between Service Corp International (SCI, Company) and UMB Financial Corp (UMBF, Company).

SCI is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while UMBF is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceUMBF has outperformed SCI, delivering a return of +9.9% compared to +8.6%

SCI vs UMBF - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
SCI
$10B
Winner
UMBF
$10B
Max Drawdown
SCI
84.87%
Winner
UMBF
55.48%
Sharpe Ratio
SCI
-0.27
Winner
UMBF
1.24
5Y Beta
Winner
SCI
0.26
UMBF
1.11
Industry
SCI
Personal Services
UMBF
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
SCI
18.94
Winner
UMBF
11.45
Forward P/E
SCI
17.12
Winner
UMBF
10.79
PEG Ratio
SCI
4.32
Winner
UMBF
0.07
Dividend Yield
Winner
SCI
1.82%
UMBF
1.25%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
SCI
10.65%
UMBF
10.48%
5Y EPS CAGR
SCI
-0.14%
Winner
UMBF
23.91%
Debt to Equity
SCI
325.85%
Winner
UMBF
6.10%
Free Cash Flow Yield
SCI
9.62%
Winner
UMBF
9.70%
P/S Ratio
Winner
SCI
2.31
UMBF
3.70
P/B Ratio
SCI
6.32
Winner
UMBF
1.34

SCI vs UMBF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
SCI
-5.01%
Winner
UMBF
+4.71%
3M
SCI
-3.91%
Winner
UMBF
+23.65%
6M
SCI
-6.22%
Winner
UMBF
+15.01%
1Y
SCI
-6.28%
Winner
UMBF
+36.54%
5Y(CAGR)
SCI
+8.62%
Winner
UMBF
+9.90%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
SCI
+12.45%
UMBF
+11.46%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
SCI
+9.43%
UMBF
+9.40%

SCI vs UMBF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearSCIUMBF
2026-4.36%+18.40%
2025+2.36%+4.43%
2024+17.37%+36.78%
2023+2.83%+3.42%
2022+1.13%-20.94%
2021+48.48%+56.84%
2020+8.22%+2.31%
2019+16.60%+12.96%
2018+8.60%-14.08%
2017+31.77%-4.73%
2016+13.85%+72.72%
2015+17.40%-15.46%
2014+26.35%-8.37%
2013+29.92%+45.29%
2012+32.01%+16.28%
2011+30.56%-10.95%
2010+1.15%+7.25%
2009+67.05%-18.23%
2008-63.58%+33.58%
2007+35.29%+5.13%
2006+27.44%+13.65%
2005+13.12%+15.86%
2004+35.95%+20.02%
2003+49.72%+25.51%
2002-37.71%-4.66%
2001+219.87%+17.31%
2000-75.00%+4.09%
1999-27.41%-9.66%

SCI vs UMBF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SCI was -84.87%, occurring on Jan 2, 2001. Recovery took 1782 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for UMBF was -52.70%, occurring on Oct 3, 2011. Recovery took 1303 trading sessions.

The current SCI drawdown is -16.20%.

RankSCIUMBF
#1-84.87%
Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 5, 2006
-52.70%
Sep 19, 2008 - Nov 21, 2013
#2-80.57%
Oct 31, 2007 - Jul 18, 2012
-50.23%
Jan 14, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024
#3-34.00%
Mar 4, 2020 - Jan 25, 2021
-45.00%
Jun 8, 2018 - Jan 7, 2021
#4-31.63%
Aug 17, 2015 - Feb 14, 2017
-37.76%
Jan 22, 2014 - Nov 9, 2016
#5-27.14%
Aug 1, 2022 - Feb 29, 2024
-31.80%
Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 21, 2026
#6-21.61%
Apr 24, 2026 - Jun 3, 2026
-29.26%
Nov 3, 1999 - Jun 28, 2001
#7-20.84%
May 31, 2007 - Oct 30, 2007
-27.59%
May 15, 2002 - Sep 16, 2003
#8-19.41%
Dec 3, 2018 - Jun 19, 2019
-22.52%
Sep 19, 2007 - Apr 24, 2008
#9-18.43%
Dec 29, 2021 - Apr 13, 2022
-21.27%
Mar 1, 2017 - Jun 7, 2018
#10-16.32%
Nov 27, 2024 - Apr 24, 2026
-18.57%
Feb 6, 2026 - May 6, 2026
#11-14.65%
Feb 11, 2021 - Apr 29, 2021
-16.25%
Aug 21, 2001 - Apr 1, 2002
#12-12.24%
Oct 22, 2013 - Mar 6, 2014
-16.10%
Jun 20, 2008 - Jul 22, 2008
#13-11.65%
Feb 1, 2018 - Aug 6, 2018
-14.40%
May 14, 2021 - Oct 1, 2021
#14-11.06%
May 4, 2022 - Jul 20, 2022
-12.75%
Aug 11, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008
#15-10.96%
Sep 13, 2019 - Jan 16, 2020
-10.65%
Dec 9, 2016 - Feb 21, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between SCI and UMBF is 0.94 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.94
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

SCI vs UMBF dividend yield comparison.

YearSCIUMBF
20260.96%0.63%
20251.67%1.42%
20241.50%1.39%
20231.64%1.83%
20221.48%1.78%
20211.24%1.30%
20201.59%1.81%
20191.56%1.76%
20181.69%1.92%
20171.55%1.45%
20161.80%1.28%
20151.69%2.04%
20141.50%1.60%
20131.49%1.35%
20122.03%1.89%
20111.78%2.12%
20101.94%1.81%
20091.95%1.80%
20083.22%1.67%
20070.85%1.49%
20060.98%1.41%
20050.92%1.42%
20040.00%1.50%
20030.00%1.70%
20020.00%2.09%
20010.00%1.45%
20000.00%2.14%
19990.00%0.50%

Select Stocks to Compare