SANM vs FMS
Comparison between Sanmina Corp (SANM, Company) and Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS, Company).
SANM is from the Technology sector, while FMS is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceSANM has outperformed FMS, delivering a return of +42.7% compared to -8.7%
SANM vs FMS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SANM vs FMS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SANM vs FMS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SANM | FMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +55.91% | -6.32% |
| 2025 | +98.85% | +10.46% |
| 2024 | +50.11% | +9.62% |
| 2023 | -9.51% | +32.75% |
| 2022 | +36.31% | -48.69% |
| 2021 | +30.83% | -22.15% |
| 2020 | -7.97% | +14.17% |
| 2019 | +42.37% | +14.97% |
| 2018 | -27.75% | -37.35% |
| 2017 | -8.84% | +25.11% |
| 2016 | +79.66% | +3.00% |
| 2015 | -11.94% | +15.27% |
| 2014 | +43.13% | +7.92% |
| 2013 | +48.18% | +4.68% |
| 2012 | +14.72% | -1.60% |
| 2011 | -23.50% | +19.12% |
| 2010 | -0.61% | +6.92% |
| 2009 | +267.67% | +12.89% |
| 2008 | -73.60% | -9.60% |
| 2007 | -47.55% | +17.56% |
| 2006 | -21.23% | +24.19% |
| 2005 | -48.05% | +32.87% |
| 2004 | -32.56% | +13.43% |
| 2003 | +179.38% | +75.69% |
| 2002 | -77.83% | -32.86% |
| 2001 | -42.06% | -28.05% |
| 2000 | +54.46% | -1.41% |
| 1999 | +11.13% | +20.10% |
SANM vs FMS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SANM was -99.66%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for FMS was -76.71%, occurring on Sep 19, 2002. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The current SANM drawdown is -29.84%. The current FMS drawdown is -54.52%.
| Rank | SANM | FMS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -99.66% Aug 31, 2000 - Mar 5, 2009 | -76.71% Sep 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2005 |
| #2 | -27.01% Mar 31, 2000 - Jun 1, 2000 | -75.62% Jan 31, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 |
| #3 | -17.15% Jul 20, 2000 - Aug 7, 2000 | -39.57% Jul 10, 2008 - Aug 17, 2010 |
| #4 | -15.12% Dec 13, 1999 - Jan 20, 2000 | -24.50% Dec 1, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 |
| #5 | -13.82% Mar 17, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000 | -20.91% Jul 26, 2011 - Feb 25, 2015 |
| #6 | -10.91% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 13, 1999 | -20.16% Jan 10, 2008 - Jul 3, 2008 |
| #7 | -9.73% Aug 10, 2000 - Aug 31, 2000 | -19.10% Aug 9, 2016 - May 31, 2017 |
| #8 | -9.23% Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 17, 2000 | -15.76% May 2, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 |
| #9 | -8.68% Jan 25, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -14.90% Jul 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 |
| #10 | -6.56% Feb 8, 2000 - Feb 24, 2000 | -13.95% Nov 2, 2015 - Jul 28, 2016 |
| #11 | -6.46% Feb 24, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000 | -12.99% Mar 1, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 |
| #12 | -5.47% Jul 3, 2000 - Jul 6, 2000 | -12.90% Oct 14, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 |
| #13 | -4.87% Aug 7, 2000 - Aug 10, 2000 | -11.81% May 8, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007 |
| #14 | -4.83% Jun 5, 2000 - Jun 9, 2000 | -10.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 25, 2011 |
| #15 | -4.73% Jun 20, 2000 - Jun 26, 2000 | -9.92% Jun 14, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between SANM and FMS is -0.35 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks