FMS vs CRBG
Comparison between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS, Company) and Corebridge Financial Inc (CRBG, Company).
FMS is from the Healthcare sector, while CRBG is from the Financial Services sector.
FMS vs CRBG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FMS vs CRBG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FMS vs CRBG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FMS | CRBG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -6.32% | -9.21% |
| 2025 | +10.46% | +2.42% |
| 2024 | +9.62% | +40.37% |
| 2023 | +32.75% | +24.22% |
| 2022 | -48.69% | -0.97% |
| 2021 | -22.15% | N/A |
| 2020 | +14.17% | N/A |
| 2019 | +14.97% | N/A |
| 2018 | -37.35% | N/A |
| 2017 | +25.11% | N/A |
| 2016 | +3.00% | N/A |
| 2015 | +15.27% | N/A |
| 2014 | +7.92% | N/A |
| 2013 | +4.68% | N/A |
| 2012 | -1.60% | N/A |
| 2011 | +19.12% | N/A |
| 2010 | +6.92% | N/A |
| 2009 | +12.89% | N/A |
| 2008 | -9.60% | N/A |
| 2007 | +17.56% | N/A |
| 2006 | +24.19% | N/A |
| 2005 | +32.87% | N/A |
| 2004 | +13.43% | N/A |
| 2003 | +75.69% | N/A |
| 2002 | -32.86% | N/A |
| 2001 | -28.05% | N/A |
| 2000 | -1.41% | N/A |
| 1999 | +20.10% | N/A |
FMS vs CRBG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FMS was -76.71%, occurring on Sep 19, 2002. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CRBG was -36.33%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current FMS drawdown is -54.52%. The current CRBG drawdown is -22.09%.
| Rank | FMS | CRBG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -76.71% Sep 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2005 | -36.33% Jul 29, 2025 - Mar 27, 2026 |
| #2 | -75.62% Jan 31, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 | -35.09% Oct 28, 2022 - Oct 16, 2023 |
| #3 | -39.57% Jul 10, 2008 - Aug 17, 2010 | -26.19% Feb 28, 2025 - Jun 26, 2025 |
| #4 | -24.50% Dec 1, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 | -22.79% May 16, 2024 - Oct 28, 2024 |
| #5 | -20.91% Jul 26, 2011 - Feb 25, 2015 | -13.06% Nov 6, 2024 - Jan 24, 2025 |
| #6 | -20.16% Jan 10, 2008 - Jul 3, 2008 | -9.53% Sep 19, 2022 - Oct 21, 2022 |
| #7 | -19.10% Aug 9, 2016 - May 31, 2017 | -8.91% Apr 3, 2024 - May 6, 2024 |
| #8 | -15.76% May 2, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 | -8.01% Nov 2, 2023 - Nov 22, 2023 |
| #9 | -14.90% Jul 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 | -7.82% Oct 17, 2023 - Nov 2, 2023 |
| #10 | -13.95% Nov 2, 2015 - Jul 28, 2016 | -6.48% Oct 30, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024 |
| #11 | -12.99% Mar 1, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 | -6.19% Feb 16, 2024 - Mar 14, 2024 |
| #12 | -12.90% Oct 14, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 | -6.18% Jan 29, 2025 - Feb 28, 2025 |
| #13 | -11.81% May 8, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007 | -5.87% May 8, 2024 - May 16, 2024 |
| #14 | -10.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 25, 2011 | -5.81% Jan 25, 2024 - Feb 15, 2024 |
| #15 | -9.92% Jun 14, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 | -4.47% Jun 27, 2025 - Jul 28, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between FMS and CRBG is 0.60 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FMS vs CRBG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FMS | CRBG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| 2025 | 3.30% | 3.18% |
| 2024 | 2.80% | 3.07% |
| 2023 | 2.97% | 12.47% |
| 2022 | 4.34% | 2.29% |
| 2021 | 2.57% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 1.72% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 1.78% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.95% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.70% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 0.74% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 0.71% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.99% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.96% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.93% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.93% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.24% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.81% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks