StockComparison Logo
vs

RTO vs LAMR

Comparison between Rentokil Initial (RTO, Company) and Lamar Advertising Co - Class A (LAMR, Company).

RTO is from the Industrials sector, while LAMR is from the Real Estate sector.

5-Year PerformanceLAMR has outperformed RTO, delivering a return of +12.9% compared to -0.6%

RTO vs LAMR - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
RTO
$15B
LAMR
$15B
Max Drawdown
Winner
RTO
87.38%
LAMR
92.26%
Sharpe Ratio
RTO
0.87
Winner
LAMR
1.19
5Y Beta
Winner
RTO
0.73
LAMR
0.79
Industry
RTO
Specialty Business Services
LAMR
Reit - Specialty
P/E Ratio
Winner
RTO
13.66
LAMR
28.56
Forward P/E
Winner
RTO
18.42
LAMR
29.50
PEG Ratio
Winner
RTO
0.27
LAMR
3.97
Dividend Yield
RTO
2.06%
Winner
LAMR
4.15%
5Y Dividends CAGR
RTO
12.75%
Winner
LAMR
34.08%
5Y EPS CAGR
RTO
N/A
LAMR
7.55%
Debt to Equity
Winner
RTO
111.54%
LAMR
356.02%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
RTO
10.83%
LAMR
4.58%
P/S Ratio
Winner
RTO
2.19
LAMR
6.76
P/B Ratio
Winner
RTO
2.76
LAMR
15.58

RTO vs LAMR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
RTO
-6.32%
Winner
LAMR
+4.62%
3M
RTO
-4.77%
Winner
LAMR
+16.63%
6M
RTO
+8.21%
Winner
LAMR
+23.75%
1Y
RTO
+31.42%
Winner
LAMR
+33.77%
5Y(CAGR)
RTO
-0.61%
Winner
LAMR
+12.94%
10Y(CAGR)
RTO
+10.49%
Winner
LAMR
+14.39%
Max(CAGR)
RTO
+4.84%
Winner
LAMR
+6.38%

RTO vs LAMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearRTOLAMR
2026+3.90%+25.84%
2025+20.90%+10.31%
2024-5.45%+19.69%
2023-7.11%+21.94%
2022-21.80%-18.41%
2021+10.91%+56.85%
2020+18.47%-2.55%
2019+44.50%+39.36%
2018+2.83%-0.05%
2017+63.10%+14.38%
2016+19.30%+18.04%
2015+32.98%+17.05%
2014-0.42%+9.01%
2013+22.43%+30.69%
2012+59.12%+37.02%
2011-36.58%-32.40%
2010-18.85%+23.23%
2009+181.40%+121.12%
2008-71.04%-73.62%
2007-29.83%-22.79%
2006N/A+41.51%
2005N/A+8.26%
2004N/A+13.90%
2003N/A+4.07%
2002N/A-20.62%
2001N/A+15.49%
2000N/A-36.34%
1999N/A+8.38%

RTO vs LAMR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for RTO was -86.60%, occurring on Dec 4, 2008. Recovery took 2336 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LAMR was -91.85%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2262 trading sessions.

The current RTO drawdown is -22.49%. The current LAMR drawdown is -2.27%.

RankRTOLAMR
#1-86.60%
Nov 1, 2007 - Feb 13, 2017
-91.85%
Jan 11, 2007 - Jan 6, 2016
#2-50.87%
Nov 12, 2021 - Apr 7, 2025
-65.88%
Feb 20, 2020 - Mar 5, 2021
#3-42.03%
Mar 4, 2020 - Jul 14, 2020
-60.77%
Feb 4, 2000 - Jan 10, 2007
#4-23.45%
Jun 6, 2018 - Apr 4, 2019
-30.05%
Dec 30, 2021 - Feb 22, 2024
#5-19.60%
Oct 31, 2017 - May 21, 2018
-23.85%
Oct 15, 2024 - Nov 21, 2025
#6-13.39%
Jan 8, 2021 - Jul 29, 2021
-18.81%
Dec 14, 2017 - Aug 16, 2018
#7-12.62%
Nov 5, 2020 - Jan 8, 2021
-18.30%
Feb 21, 2017 - Nov 7, 2017
#8-11.27%
Jul 13, 2007 - Aug 31, 2007
-18.10%
Nov 7, 2018 - Mar 4, 2019
#9-9.98%
May 3, 2019 - Jul 3, 2019
-17.39%
Jan 6, 2016 - Mar 17, 2016
#10-8.87%
Jul 30, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
-13.11%
Jul 22, 2016 - Dec 19, 2016
#11-8.06%
Sep 22, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021
-12.55%
Nov 9, 2021 - Dec 29, 2021
#12-7.53%
Apr 17, 2017 - May 2, 2017
-11.63%
Jun 20, 2019 - Nov 15, 2019
#13-7.49%
Jul 24, 2019 - Aug 7, 2019
-11.43%
Dec 9, 1999 - Jan 25, 2000
#14-6.43%
Mar 2, 2017 - Mar 16, 2017
-11.34%
Jan 26, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
#15-6.39%
Feb 21, 2020 - Mar 3, 2020
-10.05%
Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between RTO and LAMR is 0.84 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.84
-101

Dividend Comparison (2007 - 2026)

RTO vs LAMR dividend yield comparison.

YearRTOLAMR
20261.34%1.04%
20252.23%5.10%
20242.28%4.64%
20231.73%4.70%
20221.38%5.30%
20211.30%3.30%
20200.00%3.00%
20190.87%4.30%
20181.14%5.28%
20171.69%4.47%
20162.99%4.49%
20151.54%4.58%
20141.88%4.66%
20131.52%0.00%
20121.78%0.00%
200817.23%0.00%
20071.65%6.76%

Select Stocks to Compare