StockComparison Logo
vs

LAMR vs CLH

Comparison between Lamar Advertising Co - Class A (LAMR, Company) and Clean Harbors Inc (CLH, Company).

LAMR is from the Real Estate sector, while CLH is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCLH has outperformed LAMR, delivering a return of +25.1% compared to +13.7%

LAMR vs CLH - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
LAMR
$15B
Winner
CLH
$15B
Max Drawdown
LAMR
92.26%
Winner
CLH
80.87%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
LAMR
1.47
CLH
0.86
5Y Beta
LAMR
0.81
CLH
N/A
Industry
LAMR
Reit - Specialty
CLH
Waste Management
P/E Ratio
Winner
LAMR
28.76
CLH
39.26
Forward P/E
Winner
LAMR
29.50
CLH
34.25
PEG Ratio
Winner
LAMR
4.00
CLH
17.65
Dividend Yield
LAMR
4.12%
CLH
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
LAMR
34.08%
Winner
CLH
125.50%
5Y EPS CAGR
LAMR
7.55%
Winner
CLH
23.04%
Debt to Equity
LAMR
356.02%
Winner
CLH
99.95%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
LAMR
4.55%
CLH
3.03%
P/S Ratio
LAMR
6.73
Winner
CLH
2.54
P/B Ratio
LAMR
15.63
Winner
CLH
5.56

LAMR vs CLH - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
LAMR
+14.64%
CLH
-5.74%
3M
Winner
LAMR
+17.35%
CLH
+2.17%
6M
LAMR
+19.69%
Winner
CLH
+32.20%
1Y
Winner
LAMR
+40.56%
CLH
+26.00%
5Y(CAGR)
LAMR
+13.66%
Winner
CLH
+25.07%
10Y(CAGR)
LAMR
+14.45%
Winner
CLH
+19.01%
Max(CAGR)
LAMR
+6.36%
Winner
CLH
+33.29%

LAMR vs CLH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearLAMRCLH
2026+24.82%+17.86%
2025+10.31%+2.17%
2024+19.69%+34.87%
2023+21.94%+53.43%
2022-18.41%+17.17%
2021+56.85%+33.54%
2020-2.55%-10.49%
2019+39.36%+72.54%
2018-0.05%-7.51%
2017+14.38%-2.78%
2016+18.04%+32.06%
2015+17.05%-14.07%
2014+9.01%-18.57%
2013+30.69%+10.14%
2012+37.02%-12.21%
2011-32.40%+202.04%
2010+23.23%+38.59%
2009+121.12%-6.38%
2008-73.62%+26.05%
2007-22.79%+9.89%
2006+41.51%+67.31%
2005+8.26%+115.12%
2004+13.90%+107.82%
2003+4.07%-33.48%
2002-20.62%+519.75%
2001+15.49%+129.79%
2000-36.34%+46.10%
1999+8.38%-16.67%

LAMR vs CLH Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LAMR was -91.85%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2262 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLH was -77.69%, occurring on Oct 23, 2003. Recovery took 435 trading sessions.

The current LAMR drawdown is -3.06%. The current CLH drawdown is -8.54%.

RankLAMRCLH
#1-91.85%
Jan 11, 2007 - Jan 6, 2016
-77.69%
Dec 18, 2002 - Sep 13, 2004
#2-65.88%
Feb 20, 2020 - Mar 5, 2021
-64.51%
Feb 20, 2020 - Feb 24, 2021
#3-60.77%
Feb 4, 2000 - Jan 10, 2007
-56.67%
Mar 17, 2000 - Oct 22, 2001
#4-30.05%
Dec 30, 2021 - Feb 22, 2024
-54.43%
May 20, 2002 - Nov 21, 2002
#5-23.85%
Oct 15, 2024 - Nov 21, 2025
-50.39%
Aug 28, 2008 - Dec 20, 2010
#6-18.81%
Dec 14, 2017 - Aug 16, 2018
-44.03%
Feb 23, 2012 - Sep 7, 2018
#7-18.30%
Feb 21, 2017 - Nov 7, 2017
-36.30%
Oct 22, 2001 - Jan 29, 2002
#8-18.10%
Nov 7, 2018 - Mar 4, 2019
-34.99%
Sep 7, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019
#9-17.39%
Jan 6, 2016 - Mar 17, 2016
-30.86%
Oct 29, 2024 - Jan 15, 2026
#10-13.11%
Jul 22, 2016 - Dec 19, 2016
-30.19%
Nov 7, 2005 - May 4, 2006
#11-12.55%
Nov 9, 2021 - Dec 29, 2021
-29.27%
Nov 2, 2021 - Aug 12, 2022
#12-11.63%
Jun 20, 2019 - Nov 15, 2019
-28.02%
Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 11, 2000
#13-11.43%
Dec 9, 1999 - Jan 25, 2000
-21.97%
Jan 19, 2000 - Mar 3, 2000
#14-11.34%
Jan 26, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
-21.04%
Apr 10, 2002 - May 13, 2002
#15-10.05%
Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
-20.69%
Jan 31, 2002 - Feb 25, 2002

Correlation

Correlation between LAMR and CLH is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.93
-101

Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)

LAMR vs CLH dividend yield comparison.

YearLAMRCLH
20261.05%0.00%
20255.10%0.00%
20244.64%0.00%
20234.70%0.00%
20225.30%0.00%
20213.30%0.00%
20203.00%0.00%
20194.30%0.00%
20185.28%0.00%
20174.47%0.00%
20164.49%0.00%
20154.58%0.00%
20144.66%0.00%
20110.00%84.34%
20076.76%1.79%
20060.00%1.90%
20050.00%6.40%
20040.00%12.22%
20030.00%20.70%
20020.00%11.85%
20010.00%12.62%

Select Stocks to Compare