RM vs TSBK
Comparison between Regional Management Corp (RM, Company) and Timberland Bancorp Inc (TSBK, Company).
Both RM and TSBK are from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceTSBK has outperformed RM, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to -2.2%
RM vs TSBK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
RM vs TSBK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
RM vs TSBK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | RM | TSBK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -3.53% | +22.53% |
| 2025 | +20.12% | +24.49% |
| 2024 | +33.92% | +0.70% |
| 2023 | -9.40% | -4.80% |
| 2022 | -49.56% | +25.26% |
| 2021 | +104.86% | +18.21% |
| 2020 | +0.26% | -17.59% |
| 2019 | +24.55% | +30.14% |
| 2018 | -8.66% | -14.37% |
| 2017 | -1.68% | +33.50% |
| 2016 | +78.17% | +71.89% |
| 2015 | +0.59% | +21.32% |
| 2014 | -52.00% | +12.17% |
| 2013 | +102.81% | +40.76% |
| 2012 | +0.61% | +68.45% |
| 2011 | N/A | +1.54% |
| 2010 | N/A | -13.00% |
| 2009 | N/A | -39.07% |
| 2008 | N/A | -34.39% |
| 2007 | N/A | -33.34% |
| 2006 | N/A | +63.11% |
| 2005 | N/A | +8.26% |
| 2004 | N/A | +2.75% |
| 2003 | N/A | +27.08% |
| 2002 | N/A | +20.68% |
| 2001 | N/A | +19.27% |
| 2000 | N/A | +21.88% |
| 1999 | N/A | -4.66% |
RM vs TSBK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for RM was -71.80%, occurring on Apr 3, 2020. Recovery took 681 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TSBK was -86.24%, occurring on Feb 23, 2009. Recovery took 2535 trading sessions.
The current RM drawdown is -30.38%. The current TSBK drawdown is -1.20%.
| Rank | RM | TSBK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -71.80% Jun 20, 2018 - Mar 5, 2021 | -86.24% Aug 30, 2006 - Sep 26, 2016 |
| #2 | -68.61% Jan 10, 2014 - May 7, 2018 | -62.35% Jul 3, 2018 - Nov 10, 2022 |
| #3 | -64.61% Sep 27, 2021 - Feb 13, 2024 | -36.06% Feb 13, 2023 - Nov 6, 2024 |
| #4 | -24.11% Apr 2, 2012 - Sep 6, 2012 | -23.55% Nov 8, 1999 - Aug 8, 2000 |
| #5 | -15.86% Aug 1, 2013 - Sep 26, 2013 | -17.98% Oct 10, 2017 - Apr 19, 2018 |
| #6 | -14.14% Oct 16, 2012 - Mar 4, 2013 | -15.47% Nov 6, 2024 - Jul 23, 2025 |
| #7 | -12.21% Jun 8, 2021 - Jul 20, 2021 | -14.91% Aug 2, 2001 - Apr 24, 2002 |
| #8 | -10.18% Oct 23, 2013 - Dec 20, 2013 | -14.45% Sep 15, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025 |
| #9 | -8.53% Mar 15, 2021 - Apr 12, 2021 | -14.32% Oct 16, 2003 - Oct 26, 2004 |
| #10 | -8.49% Sep 16, 2021 - Sep 24, 2021 | -12.25% Nov 12, 2004 - Jan 31, 2006 |
| #11 | -7.15% Aug 4, 2021 - Aug 31, 2021 | -12.22% Jan 5, 2001 - May 16, 2001 |
| #12 | -5.32% Jun 1, 2021 - Jun 7, 2021 | -12.02% May 17, 2002 - Aug 30, 2002 |
| #13 | -4.72% Sep 7, 2012 - Oct 12, 2012 | -11.40% Sep 19, 2000 - Nov 30, 2000 |
| #14 | -4.64% Jun 18, 2013 - Jul 5, 2013 | -10.00% Jun 10, 2003 - Aug 26, 2003 |
| #15 | -4.37% May 10, 2021 - May 17, 2021 | -9.94% Jul 23, 2025 - Sep 4, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between RM and TSBK is 0.71 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
RM vs TSBK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | RM | TSBK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.61% | 1.36% |
| 2025 | 3.10% | 2.93% |
| 2024 | 3.53% | 3.18% |
| 2023 | 4.78% | 2.92% |
| 2022 | 4.27% | 2.87% |
| 2021 | 1.65% | 3.75% |
| 2020 | 0.67% | 3.30% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.35% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 2.33% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 1.96% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 1.65% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.50% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.70% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.25% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.28% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 6.98% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 5.91% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 3.12% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.83% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 2.64% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.54% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.29% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.52% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.71% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 2.79% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.71% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks