REG vs FMS
Comparison between Regency Centers Corporation (REG, Company) and Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS, Company).
REG is from the Real Estate sector, while FMS is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceREG has outperformed FMS, delivering a return of +8.6% compared to -7.8%
REG vs FMS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
REG vs FMS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
REG vs FMS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | REG | FMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +19.78% | +5.53% |
| 2025 | -0.47% | +10.46% |
| 2024 | +13.64% | +9.62% |
| 2023 | +11.18% | +32.75% |
| 2022 | -14.43% | -48.69% |
| 2021 | +76.50% | -22.15% |
| 2020 | -22.17% | +14.17% |
| 2019 | +15.09% | +14.97% |
| 2018 | -12.47% | -37.35% |
| 2017 | +3.68% | +25.11% |
| 2016 | +4.86% | +3.00% |
| 2015 | +8.28% | +15.27% |
| 2014 | +43.56% | +7.92% |
| 2013 | +0.93% | +4.68% |
| 2012 | +30.58% | -1.60% |
| 2011 | -8.58% | +19.12% |
| 2010 | +27.69% | +6.92% |
| 2009 | -14.96% | +12.89% |
| 2008 | -23.06% | -9.60% |
| 2007 | -15.07% | +17.56% |
| 2006 | +34.12% | +24.19% |
| 2005 | +12.54% | +32.87% |
| 2004 | +46.48% | +13.43% |
| 2003 | +30.43% | +75.69% |
| 2002 | +27.97% | -32.86% |
| 2001 | +26.98% | -28.05% |
| 2000 | +29.81% | -1.41% |
| 1999 | +4.86% | +20.10% |
REG vs FMS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for REG was -73.31%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 1983 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FMS was -76.71%, occurring on Sep 19, 2002. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The current REG drawdown is -0.61%. The current FMS drawdown is -48.77%.
| Rank | REG | FMS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -73.31% Feb 7, 2007 - Dec 22, 2014 | -76.71% Sep 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2005 |
| #2 | -57.05% Aug 1, 2016 - Oct 14, 2021 | -75.62% Jan 31, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 |
| #3 | -30.07% Jan 4, 2022 - Aug 2, 2024 | -39.57% Jul 10, 2008 - Aug 17, 2010 |
| #4 | -24.49% Apr 1, 2004 - Aug 30, 2004 | -24.50% Dec 1, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 |
| #5 | -17.10% Mar 20, 2015 - Nov 2, 2015 | -20.91% Jul 26, 2011 - Feb 25, 2015 |
| #6 | -16.25% Aug 2, 2005 - Jan 6, 2006 | -20.16% Jan 10, 2008 - Jul 3, 2008 |
| #7 | -14.95% Mar 3, 2025 - Feb 5, 2026 | -19.10% Aug 9, 2016 - May 31, 2017 |
| #8 | -13.68% Dec 31, 2004 - May 16, 2005 | -15.76% May 2, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 |
| #9 | -12.99% Jul 5, 2002 - Jul 29, 2002 | -14.90% Jul 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 |
| #10 | -12.90% Mar 17, 2006 - Sep 12, 2006 | -13.95% Nov 2, 2015 - Jul 28, 2016 |
| #11 | -12.51% Aug 23, 2001 - Nov 23, 2001 | -12.99% Mar 1, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 |
| #12 | -9.65% Jul 31, 2000 - Dec 11, 2000 | -12.90% Oct 14, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 |
| #13 | -9.59% May 1, 2000 - Jun 30, 2000 | -11.81% May 8, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007 |
| #14 | -9.57% Nov 5, 2021 - Dec 31, 2021 | -10.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 25, 2011 |
| #15 | -8.95% Jan 10, 2000 - Apr 7, 2000 | -9.92% Jun 14, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between REG and FMS is 0.58 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
REG vs FMS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | REG | FMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.89% | 3.65% |
| 2025 | 4.16% | 3.30% |
| 2024 | 3.67% | 2.80% |
| 2023 | 3.91% | 2.97% |
| 2022 | 4.04% | 4.34% |
| 2021 | 3.20% | 2.57% |
| 2020 | 5.22% | 1.72% |
| 2019 | 3.71% | 1.78% |
| 2018 | 3.78% | 1.95% |
| 2017 | 3.04% | 0.70% |
| 2016 | 2.90% | 0.74% |
| 2015 | 2.85% | 0.71% |
| 2014 | 2.95% | 0.99% |
| 2013 | 4.00% | 0.94% |
| 2012 | 3.93% | 0.91% |
| 2011 | 4.92% | 0.96% |
| 2010 | 4.38% | 0.93% |
| 2009 | 6.03% | 1.06% |
| 2008 | 6.21% | 1.38% |
| 2007 | 4.09% | 0.91% |
| 2006 | 3.04% | 0.93% |
| 2005 | 3.73% | 1.06% |
| 2004 | 3.83% | 1.22% |
| 2003 | 5.22% | 1.24% |
| 2002 | 6.30% | 1.49% |
| 2001 | 7.21% | 0.81% |
| 2000 | 8.10% | 0.58% |
| 1999 | 2.30% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks