PUK vs CQP
Comparison between Prudential plc (PUK, Company) and Cheniere Energy Partners LP (CQP, Company).
PUK is from the Financial Services sector, while CQP is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceCQP has outperformed PUK, delivering a return of +15.2% compared to -5.9%
PUK vs CQP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PUK vs CQP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PUK vs CQP - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PUK | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -14.85% | +20.46% |
| 2025 | +102.41% | +1.85% |
| 2024 | -24.68% | +9.37% |
| 2023 | -19.00% | -1.11% |
| 2022 | -20.88% | +44.85% |
| 2021 | -1.20% | +29.47% |
| 2020 | -2.38% | -4.20% |
| 2019 | +29.52% | +17.88% |
| 2018 | -28.65% | +29.23% |
| 2017 | +30.01% | +7.48% |
| 2016 | -4.56% | +19.44% |
| 2015 | +0.73% | -15.36% |
| 2014 | +6.71% | +19.27% |
| 2013 | +56.31% | +41.07% |
| 2012 | +46.11% | +26.60% |
| 2011 | -2.79% | -8.85% |
| 2010 | +4.41% | +74.14% |
| 2009 | +73.80% | +242.49% |
| 2008 | -53.90% | -73.00% |
| 2007 | +3.47% | -22.58% |
| 2006 | +43.19% | N/A |
| 2005 | +15.14% | N/A |
| 2004 | +6.69% | N/A |
| 2003 | +22.50% | N/A |
| 2002 | -38.91% | N/A |
| 2001 | -25.12% | N/A |
| 2000 | +187.24% | N/A |
PUK vs CQP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PUK was -82.51%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1352 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CQP was -78.51%, occurring on Dec 31, 2008. Recovery took 686 trading sessions.
The current PUK drawdown is -31.10%. The current CQP drawdown is -8.59%.
| Rank | PUK | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.51% May 7, 2007 - Sep 14, 2012 | -78.51% Apr 17, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010 |
| #2 | -68.74% Jan 3, 2001 - Mar 20, 2006 | -60.29% Sep 16, 2019 - Mar 11, 2021 |
| #3 | -63.59% Oct 7, 2021 - Jan 13, 2025 | -46.98% Jan 13, 2011 - Feb 27, 2012 |
| #4 | -63.54% Jan 24, 2018 - May 7, 2021 | -37.91% Jun 23, 2015 - Jan 26, 2017 |
| #5 | -41.52% May 21, 2015 - Jul 31, 2017 | -31.58% Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 22, 2013 |
| #6 | -23.52% Mar 20, 2006 - Nov 17, 2006 | -29.08% Nov 30, 2022 - Nov 2, 2023 |
| #7 | -20.02% May 7, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021 | -27.92% May 4, 2022 - Aug 25, 2022 |
| #8 | -19.39% Jul 21, 2000 - Nov 30, 2000 | -24.86% Nov 30, 2023 - Dec 2, 2024 |
| #9 | -15.09% Jan 10, 2014 - Mar 4, 2014 | -24.25% Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 |
| #10 | -14.02% Jan 17, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 | -23.60% Apr 1, 2025 - Mar 5, 2026 |
| #11 | -13.46% May 21, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013 | -19.63% May 30, 2014 - Apr 30, 2015 |
| #12 | -13.11% Aug 25, 2014 - Jan 26, 2015 | -19.24% Mar 4, 2022 - May 4, 2022 |
| #13 | -11.07% Aug 12, 2013 - Sep 16, 2013 | -19.17% May 31, 2013 - Jul 23, 2013 |
| #14 | -8.82% Mar 14, 2013 - Apr 26, 2013 | -17.85% May 25, 2017 - May 4, 2018 |
| #15 | -7.41% Mar 12, 2014 - Apr 30, 2014 | -17.49% Sep 27, 2018 - Jan 17, 2019 |
Correlation
Correlation between PUK and CQP is 0.44 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
PUK vs CQP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PUK | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.42% | 2.56% |
| 2025 | 1.54% | 6.15% |
| 2024 | 2.64% | 5.06% |
| 2023 | 1.72% | 8.36% |
| 2022 | 1.28% | 6.82% |
| 2021 | 4.60% | 6.30% |
| 2020 | 1.70% | 7.28% |
| 2019 | 17.06% | 6.08% |
| 2018 | 3.71% | 6.07% |
| 2017 | 2.33% | 5.79% |
| 2016 | 3.50% | 5.90% |
| 2015 | 2.62% | 6.52% |
| 2014 | 2.53% | 5.31% |
| 2013 | 2.09% | 5.93% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 8.00% |
| 2011 | 4.05% | 9.43% |
| 2010 | 2.90% | 7.98% |
| 2009 | 2.99% | 13.17% |
| 2008 | 5.57% | 45.82% |
| 2007 | 2.42% | 5.47% |
| 2006 | 2.21% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.02% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.16% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 4.28% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 5.50% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 3.03% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.73% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks