NMR vs K
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Kellanova Company (K, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while K is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed K, delivering a return of +18.6% compared to +12.7%
NMR vs K - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs K - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs K - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | K |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +18.06% | N/A |
| 2025 | +53.57% | +5.87% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | +44.96% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | -7.14% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | +13.89% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +8.82% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | -4.76% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +26.90% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | -13.33% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | -4.48% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +5.73% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | +13.73% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +10.80% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | +10.50% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | +14.44% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | +2.58% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | -0.32% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | +21.89% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -12.68% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | +6.31% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | +17.25% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | -0.25% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | +21.01% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +12.58% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | +17.75% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | +18.50% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | -8.53% |
| 1999 | +11.76% | -19.15% |
NMR vs K Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for K was -44.73%, occurring on Feb 11, 2000. Recovery took 610 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -51.09%. The current K drawdown is -0.01%.
| Rank | NMR | K |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -44.73% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 10, 2002 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -36.48% Sep 26, 2008 - Feb 2, 2010 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -34.67% Jul 19, 2016 - May 6, 2022 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -25.27% Oct 31, 2022 - Aug 5, 2024 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -22.11% Jun 5, 2002 - Nov 24, 2003 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -15.83% May 13, 2011 - Nov 20, 2012 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -15.31% Sep 18, 2007 - Aug 8, 2008 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -14.37% Jul 22, 2013 - Apr 3, 2014 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -13.78% Jun 4, 2014 - Jan 20, 2015 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -13.07% May 17, 2010 - Mar 3, 2011 |
| #11 | N/A | -10.86% Jan 22, 2015 - Aug 6, 2015 |
| #12 | N/A | -9.11% May 9, 2022 - Jul 29, 2022 |
| #13 | N/A | -8.42% Aug 19, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022 |
| #14 | N/A | -8.30% Oct 22, 2015 - Dec 15, 2015 |
| #15 | N/A | -7.66% Oct 28, 2005 - Apr 28, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and K is -0.56 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NMR vs K dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | K |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.53% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 2.76% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 2.79% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 10.56% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 3.28% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 3.59% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 3.66% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 3.27% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 3.86% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 3.12% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 2.77% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 2.74% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 2.90% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 2.95% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 3.12% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 3.30% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 3.05% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 2.69% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 2.96% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.29% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 2.27% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 2.45% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 2.26% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 2.65% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 2.95% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 3.36% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 3.79% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.80% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks