NMR vs FTS
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Fortis Inc (FTS, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while FTS is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed FTS, delivering a return of +18.6% compared to +10.0%
NMR vs FTS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs FTS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs FTS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +18.06% | +14.93% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | +30.22% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | +5.99% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | +6.17% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | -12.70% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +22.76% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | +2.27% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +30.07% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | -5.13% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | +25.09% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +23.55% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | N/A |
| 2014 | -23.82% | N/A |
| 2013 | +29.46% | N/A |
| 2012 | +92.81% | N/A |
| 2011 | -52.04% | N/A |
| 2010 | -14.33% | N/A |
| 2009 | -11.17% | N/A |
| 2008 | -49.10% | N/A |
| 2007 | -11.80% | N/A |
| 2006 | -1.99% | N/A |
| 2005 | +34.20% | N/A |
| 2004 | -14.69% | N/A |
| 2003 | +52.55% | N/A |
| 2002 | -13.30% | N/A |
| 2001 | -29.05% | N/A |
| 2000 | +2.57% | N/A |
| 1999 | +11.76% | N/A |
NMR vs FTS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for FTS was -34.36%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 271 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -51.09%.
| Rank | NMR | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -34.36% Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 16, 2021 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -29.96% Apr 6, 2022 - Mar 31, 2025 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -16.05% Nov 24, 2017 - Mar 12, 2019 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -14.04% Jul 6, 2016 - Apr 12, 2017 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -13.81% Feb 4, 2016 - Mar 7, 2016 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -7.75% Jan 13, 2016 - Jan 22, 2016 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -7.63% Sep 26, 2019 - Jan 15, 2020 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -6.63% May 7, 2025 - Aug 1, 2025 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -6.49% Dec 31, 2021 - Mar 17, 2022 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -6.21% Mar 16, 2026 - Jun 26, 2026 |
| #11 | N/A | -6.13% Apr 3, 2025 - Apr 14, 2025 |
| #12 | N/A | -5.83% Sep 8, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017 |
| #13 | N/A | -5.77% Aug 16, 2021 - Dec 14, 2021 |
| #14 | N/A | -5.39% Jun 15, 2021 - Aug 16, 2021 |
| #15 | N/A | -4.76% Apr 17, 2017 - Jun 5, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and FTS is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NMR vs FTS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.53% | 1.60% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 3.42% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 4.62% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 4.50% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 4.48% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 3.40% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 3.54% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 3.31% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 3.35% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 4.43% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 4.94% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks