StockComparison Logo
vs

NMR vs FTS

Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Fortis Inc (FTS, Company).

NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while FTS is from the Utilities sector.

5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed FTS, delivering a return of +18.6% compared to +10.0%

NMR vs FTS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
NMR
$29B
Winner
FTS
$29B
Max Drawdown
NMR
91.09%
Winner
FTS
34.36%
Sharpe Ratio
NMR
1.61
Winner
FTS
1.64
5Y Beta
NMR
1.24
Winner
FTS
-0.04
Industry
NMR
Capital Markets
FTS
Utilities - Regulated Electric
P/E Ratio
Winner
NMR
12.77
FTS
20.43
Forward P/E
Winner
NMR
15.38
FTS
22.78
PEG Ratio
NMR
5.60
Winner
FTS
1.93
Dividend Yield
NMR
3.32%
Winner
FTS
4.35%
5Y Dividends CAGR
NMR
N/A
FTS
7.87%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
NMR
15.09%
FTS
3.80%
Debt to Equity
NMR
466.51%
Winner
FTS
142.25%
Free Cash Flow Yield
NMR
-25.88%
Winner
FTS
-4.69%
P/S Ratio
Winner
NMR
0.01
FTS
2.40
P/B Ratio
Winner
NMR
1.23
FTS
1.82

NMR vs FTS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
NMR
+9.88%
FTS
+2.70%
3M
Winner
NMR
+13.18%
FTS
+4.12%
6M
NMR
+7.39%
Winner
FTS
+14.86%
1Y
Winner
NMR
+62.14%
FTS
+28.61%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
NMR
+18.64%
FTS
+9.98%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
NMR
+11.86%
FTS
+9.97%
Max(CAGR)
NMR
+0.09%
Winner
FTS
+12.35%

NMR vs FTS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearNMRFTS
2026+18.06%+14.93%
2025+53.57%+30.22%
2024+35.63%+5.99%
2023+21.20%+6.17%
2022-12.30%-12.70%
2021-17.05%+22.76%
2020+3.34%+2.27%
2019+35.43%+30.07%
2018-36.95%-5.13%
2017-0.51%+25.09%
2016+10.26%+23.55%
2015+0.64%N/A
2014-23.82%N/A
2013+29.46%N/A
2012+92.81%N/A
2011-52.04%N/A
2010-14.33%N/A
2009-11.17%N/A
2008-49.10%N/A
2007-11.80%N/A
2006-1.99%N/A
2005+34.20%N/A
2004-14.69%N/A
2003+52.55%N/A
2002-13.30%N/A
2001-29.05%N/A
2000+2.57%N/A
1999+11.76%N/A

NMR vs FTS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for FTS was -34.36%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 271 trading sessions.

The current NMR drawdown is -51.09%.

RankNMRFTS
#1-89.30%
Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011
-34.36%
Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 16, 2021
#2-20.52%
Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000
-29.96%
Apr 6, 2022 - Mar 31, 2025
#3-11.59%
Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000
-16.05%
Nov 24, 2017 - Mar 12, 2019
#4-11.04%
Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000
-14.04%
Jul 6, 2016 - Apr 12, 2017
#5-4.76%
Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999
-13.81%
Feb 4, 2016 - Mar 7, 2016
#6-4.45%
Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000
-7.75%
Jan 13, 2016 - Jan 22, 2016
#7-4.04%
Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000
-7.63%
Sep 26, 2019 - Jan 15, 2020
#8-3.28%
Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
-6.63%
May 7, 2025 - Aug 1, 2025
#9-2.21%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999
-6.49%
Dec 31, 2021 - Mar 17, 2022
#10-0.87%
Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000
-6.21%
Mar 16, 2026 - Jun 26, 2026
#11N/A-6.13%
Apr 3, 2025 - Apr 14, 2025
#12N/A-5.83%
Sep 8, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017
#13N/A-5.77%
Aug 16, 2021 - Dec 14, 2021
#14N/A-5.39%
Jun 15, 2021 - Aug 16, 2021
#15N/A-4.76%
Apr 17, 2017 - Jun 5, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between NMR and FTS is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.64
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

NMR vs FTS dividend yield comparison.

YearNMRFTS
20261.53%1.60%
20254.91%3.42%
20244.29%4.62%
20231.20%4.50%
20223.86%4.48%
20210.00%3.40%
20200.86%3.54%
20190.00%3.31%
20180.00%3.35%
20171.70%4.43%
20161.79%4.94%
20153.34%0.00%
20142.44%0.00%
20131.77%0.00%
20121.28%0.00%
20115.11%0.00%
20101.37%0.00%
20090.57%0.00%
20082.85%0.00%
20062.36%0.00%
20051.07%0.00%
20041.08%0.00%
20031.03%0.00%
20021.05%0.00%
20015.57%0.00%
20006.49%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare