NMR vs CNP
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Centerpoint Energy Inc (CNP, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while CNP is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed CNP, delivering a return of +18.4% compared to +12.9%
NMR vs CNP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs CNP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs CNP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | CNP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +15.65% | +9.41% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | +24.67% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | +12.51% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | -0.69% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | +11.16% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +34.27% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | -16.97% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +1.47% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | +5.00% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | +19.83% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +41.58% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | -18.26% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +6.81% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | +22.42% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | +0.83% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | +32.80% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | +14.16% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | +20.29% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -21.33% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | +4.39% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | +33.29% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | +19.86% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | +20.66% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +19.82% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | -65.68% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | -35.14% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | +104.64% |
| 1999 | +11.76% | -15.24% |
NMR vs CNP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CNP was -89.93%, occurring on Feb 25, 2003. Recovery took 3830 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -52.09%. The current CNP drawdown is -6.93%.
| Rank | NMR | CNP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -89.93% May 1, 2001 - Jul 22, 2016 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -59.78% Feb 22, 2019 - Mar 4, 2022 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -32.04% Oct 2, 2000 - Apr 17, 2001 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -26.28% Nov 5, 1999 - Apr 24, 2000 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -22.81% Sep 12, 2022 - Nov 19, 2024 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -16.54% Sep 11, 2017 - Dec 13, 2018 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -15.87% Apr 20, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -10.53% Jul 22, 2016 - Nov 28, 2016 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -9.32% Apr 26, 2000 - May 22, 2000 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -8.40% May 7, 2025 - Aug 4, 2025 |
| #11 | N/A | -7.23% Dec 13, 2018 - Jan 10, 2019 |
| #12 | N/A | -6.96% Sep 18, 2000 - Sep 26, 2000 |
| #13 | N/A | -6.93% Jun 26, 2026 - Aug 3, 2026 |
| #14 | N/A | -6.67% Oct 20, 2025 - Feb 3, 2026 |
| #15 | N/A | -6.31% May 26, 2000 - Jun 15, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and CNP is -0.38 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NMR vs CNP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | CNP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.56% | 1.10% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 2.30% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 2.55% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 2.70% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 2.33% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.33% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 3.42% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 4.22% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 3.93% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 3.77% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 4.18% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 5.39% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 4.05% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 3.58% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 4.21% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 3.93% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 4.96% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 5.24% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 5.78% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 3.97% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 3.62% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 3.11% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 3.54% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 4.13% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 12.59% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 5.66% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 3.46% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.64% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks