NMR vs CINF
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Cincinnati Financial Corp (CINF, Company).
Both NMR and CINF are from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed CINF, delivering a return of +15.4% compared to +11.0%
NMR vs CINF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs CINF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs CINF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | CINF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.15% | +6.02% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | +17.25% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | +39.23% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | +2.35% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | -7.20% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +37.81% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | -14.89% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +42.18% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | +8.99% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | +2.29% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +35.23% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | +19.51% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +4.46% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | +35.98% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | +33.56% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | -0.40% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | +26.24% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | -3.35% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -20.17% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | -10.80% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | +3.88% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | +3.48% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | +8.25% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +10.85% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | +1.39% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | -1.59% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | +32.38% |
| 1999 | +11.76% | -10.56% |
NMR vs CINF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CINF was -59.58%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1426 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -56.02%. The current CINF drawdown is -0.93%.
| Rank | NMR | CINF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -59.58% Oct 18, 2006 - Jun 18, 2012 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -58.14% Oct 4, 2019 - Apr 30, 2021 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -35.76% Apr 20, 2022 - Aug 23, 2024 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -29.74% May 1, 2002 - Mar 3, 2004 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -26.60% Nov 8, 1999 - Mar 31, 2000 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -26.27% May 2, 2000 - May 31, 2001 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -20.03% Nov 27, 2024 - Sep 26, 2025 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -15.30% Mar 7, 2005 - Dec 1, 2005 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -14.71% Aug 3, 2017 - Sep 17, 2018 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -13.91% Nov 27, 2013 - Nov 5, 2014 |
| #11 | N/A | -13.23% Oct 4, 2001 - Mar 15, 2002 |
| #12 | N/A | -13.01% Mar 5, 2004 - Nov 26, 2004 |
| #13 | N/A | -12.34% Oct 28, 2021 - Feb 16, 2022 |
| #14 | N/A | -12.09% Dec 3, 2018 - Feb 4, 2019 |
| #15 | N/A | -11.76% Sep 2, 2016 - Dec 7, 2016 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and CINF is -0.37 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NMR vs CINF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | CINF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 2.13% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 2.25% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 2.90% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 2.70% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.21% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 2.75% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.13% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 2.74% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 3.33% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 2.53% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 3.89% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 3.40% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 3.16% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 4.14% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 5.27% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 5.02% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 5.98% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 5.37% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 3.59% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 2.96% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 2.73% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 2.49% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 2.40% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 2.37% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 2.20% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 1.92% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.55% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks