NIM vs GBF
Comparison between Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM, ETF) and ISHARES GOVERNMENT/CREDIT BOND ETF (GBF, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceNIM has outperformed GBF, delivering a return of +0.5% compared to -0.7%
NIM vs GBF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NIM vs GBF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NIM vs GBF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NIM | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.27% | -0.35% |
| 2025 | +10.61% | +6.30% |
| 2024 | +2.15% | +1.42% |
| 2023 | +0.18% | +5.13% |
| 2022 | -12.38% | -13.13% |
| 2021 | +3.96% | -2.07% |
| 2020 | +4.94% | +8.44% |
| 2019 | +12.36% | +9.34% |
| 2018 | -0.58% | -0.15% |
| 2017 | +4.57% | +3.83% |
| 2016 | -1.60% | +2.25% |
| 2015 | -0.11% | -0.28% |
| 2014 | +14.08% | +6.05% |
| 2013 | -6.81% | -2.09% |
| 2012 | +0.95% | +4.13% |
| 2011 | +12.38% | +9.44% |
| 2010 | -0.53% | +5.44% |
| 2009 | +13.76% | +3.45% |
| 2008 | +6.10% | +6.81% |
| 2007 | -1.79% | +6.69% |
| 2006 | +8.94% | N/A |
| 2005 | +7.36% | N/A |
| 2004 | +3.05% | N/A |
| 2003 | +2.41% | N/A |
| 2002 | -1.91% | N/A |
| 2001 | +4.88% | N/A |
| 2000 | +10.49% | N/A |
| 1999 | -8.48% | N/A |
NIM vs GBF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NIM was -19.96%, occurring on Oct 3, 2023. Recovery took 1054 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GBF was -19.67%, occurring on Oct 24, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current NIM drawdown is -3.73%. The current GBF drawdown is -5.31%.
| Rank | NIM | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -19.96% Nov 18, 2021 - Feb 3, 2026 | -19.67% Aug 4, 2020 - Oct 24, 2022 |
| #2 | -16.23% Feb 5, 2020 - Aug 13, 2020 | -8.75% Sep 9, 2008 - Dec 2, 2008 |
| #3 | -16.21% Dec 3, 2012 - Sep 18, 2014 | -7.97% Mar 9, 2020 - Jun 26, 2020 |
| #4 | -15.01% Jun 4, 2008 - Jan 9, 2009 | -6.12% May 2, 2013 - Jul 23, 2014 |
| #5 | -14.42% Nov 3, 2010 - Nov 7, 2011 | -5.85% Dec 29, 2008 - Jul 31, 2009 |
| #6 | -14.17% Nov 9, 2001 - Feb 22, 2005 | -5.20% Jul 8, 2016 - Sep 5, 2017 |
| #7 | -12.13% Aug 1, 2016 - Apr 10, 2019 | -4.35% Oct 6, 2010 - Jun 1, 2011 |
| #8 | -9.68% Nov 1, 1999 - Mar 30, 2000 | -3.90% Sep 7, 2017 - Feb 7, 2019 |
| #9 | -8.81% Mar 2, 2012 - Sep 12, 2012 | -3.73% Jan 30, 2015 - Feb 11, 2016 |
| #10 | -8.60% Jan 29, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 | -2.81% Apr 9, 2008 - Sep 4, 2008 |
| #11 | -7.95% Oct 3, 2005 - Jun 1, 2006 | -2.75% May 7, 2007 - Aug 16, 2007 |
| #12 | -7.22% Feb 28, 2007 - Jan 14, 2008 | -2.58% Sep 4, 2019 - Jan 23, 2020 |
| #13 | -6.67% Mar 16, 2026 - May 19, 2026 | -2.00% Nov 12, 2012 - Apr 15, 2013 |
| #14 | -6.42% Jun 2, 2000 - Dec 19, 2000 | -1.98% Jul 24, 2012 - Nov 7, 2012 |
| #15 | -6.42% Aug 13, 2001 - Oct 31, 2001 | -1.86% Nov 30, 2009 - Mar 2, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between NIM and GBF is 0.98 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NIM vs GBF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NIM | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.16% | 1.90% |
| 2025 | 3.61% | 3.81% |
| 2024 | 4.10% | 3.94% |
| 2023 | 3.49% | 3.03% |
| 2022 | 2.88% | 2.13% |
| 2021 | 2.69% | 1.22% |
| 2020 | 3.42% | 1.64% |
| 2019 | 3.03% | 2.64% |
| 2018 | 3.27% | 2.59% |
| 2017 | 3.15% | 2.31% |
| 2016 | 3.23% | 2.09% |
| 2015 | 3.27% | 2.04% |
| 2014 | 3.21% | 2.08% |
| 2013 | 3.60% | 2.37% |
| 2012 | 3.67% | 2.53% |
| 2011 | 3.86% | 3.03% |
| 2010 | 4.21% | 3.19% |
| 2009 | 4.08% | 3.56% |
| 2008 | 4.65% | 4.17% |
| 2007 | 4.76% | 4.67% |
| 2006 | 4.78% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 4.95% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 5.10% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 5.39% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 5.57% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.25% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 2.50% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks