NIM vs FPA
Comparison between Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM, ETF) and FIRST TRUST ASIA PACIFIC EX-JAPAN ALPHADEX FUND (FPA, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceFPA has outperformed NIM, delivering a return of +10.7% compared to +0.5%
NIM vs FPA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NIM vs FPA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NIM vs FPA - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NIM | FPA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.27% | +26.21% |
| 2025 | +10.61% | +41.95% |
| 2024 | +2.15% | +5.55% |
| 2023 | +0.18% | +13.27% |
| 2022 | -12.38% | -14.58% |
| 2021 | +3.96% | +1.29% |
| 2020 | +4.94% | +13.32% |
| 2019 | +12.36% | +8.59% |
| 2018 | -0.58% | -22.54% |
| 2017 | +4.57% | +33.88% |
| 2016 | -1.60% | +2.79% |
| 2015 | -0.11% | +0.37% |
| 2014 | +14.08% | +5.58% |
| 2013 | -6.81% | +3.11% |
| 2012 | +0.95% | +24.72% |
| 2011 | +12.38% | -24.40% |
| 2010 | -0.53% | N/A |
| 2009 | +13.76% | N/A |
| 2008 | +6.10% | N/A |
| 2007 | -1.79% | N/A |
| 2006 | +8.94% | N/A |
| 2005 | +7.36% | N/A |
| 2004 | +3.05% | N/A |
| 2003 | +2.41% | N/A |
| 2002 | -1.91% | N/A |
| 2001 | +4.88% | N/A |
| 2000 | +10.49% | N/A |
| 1999 | -8.48% | N/A |
NIM vs FPA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NIM was -19.96%, occurring on Oct 3, 2023. Recovery took 1054 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FPA was -52.90%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 808 trading sessions.
The current NIM drawdown is -3.73%. The current FPA drawdown is -18.64%.
| Rank | NIM | FPA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -19.96% Nov 18, 2021 - Feb 3, 2026 | -52.90% Jan 26, 2018 - Apr 14, 2021 |
| #2 | -16.23% Feb 5, 2020 - Aug 13, 2020 | -37.78% Jul 26, 2011 - May 14, 2014 |
| #3 | -16.21% Dec 3, 2012 - Sep 18, 2014 | -35.36% Jun 2, 2021 - May 23, 2025 |
| #4 | -15.01% Jun 4, 2008 - Jan 9, 2009 | -24.59% Apr 28, 2015 - May 22, 2017 |
| #5 | -14.42% Nov 3, 2010 - Nov 7, 2011 | -21.26% Jun 1, 2026 - Jul 20, 2026 |
| #6 | -14.17% Nov 9, 2001 - Feb 22, 2005 | -15.34% Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026 |
| #7 | -12.13% Aug 1, 2016 - Apr 10, 2019 | -13.25% Aug 26, 2014 - Apr 6, 2015 |
| #8 | -9.68% Nov 1, 1999 - Mar 30, 2000 | -7.08% May 14, 2026 - May 26, 2026 |
| #9 | -8.81% Mar 2, 2012 - Sep 12, 2012 | -6.98% Apr 26, 2011 - Jul 7, 2011 |
| #10 | -8.60% Jan 29, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 | -6.39% Nov 3, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026 |
| #11 | -7.95% Oct 3, 2005 - Jun 1, 2006 | -4.74% Sep 16, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025 |
| #12 | -7.22% Feb 28, 2007 - Jan 14, 2008 | -4.40% Jul 26, 2017 - Sep 12, 2017 |
| #13 | -6.67% Mar 16, 2026 - May 19, 2026 | -4.40% May 6, 2026 - May 14, 2026 |
| #14 | -6.42% Jun 2, 2000 - Dec 19, 2000 | -4.08% Sep 18, 2017 - Oct 12, 2017 |
| #15 | -6.42% Aug 13, 2001 - Oct 31, 2001 | -3.80% May 7, 2021 - Jun 2, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between NIM and FPA is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NIM vs FPA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NIM | FPA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.16% | 1.20% |
| 2025 | 3.61% | 4.71% |
| 2024 | 4.10% | 3.40% |
| 2023 | 3.49% | 3.02% |
| 2022 | 2.88% | 4.22% |
| 2021 | 2.69% | 5.12% |
| 2020 | 3.42% | 1.59% |
| 2019 | 3.03% | 3.90% |
| 2018 | 3.27% | 2.81% |
| 2017 | 3.15% | 3.15% |
| 2016 | 3.23% | 2.42% |
| 2015 | 3.27% | 1.74% |
| 2014 | 3.21% | 4.11% |
| 2013 | 3.60% | 2.35% |
| 2012 | 3.67% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 3.86% | 2.17% |
| 2010 | 4.21% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 4.08% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 4.65% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 4.76% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 4.78% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 4.95% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 5.10% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 5.39% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 5.57% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.25% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 2.50% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks