NHS vs QLTI
Comparison between Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS, ETF) and GMO INTERNATIONAL QUALITY ETF (QLTI, ETF).
NHS vs QLTI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
Winner
NHS
$285M
QLTI
$285M
Expense Ratio
NHS
N/A
QLTI
0.60%
Max Drawdown
NHS
73.16%
Winner
QLTI
14.82%
Sharpe Ratio
NHS
-0.53
Winner
QLTI
0.11
5Y Beta
Winner
NHS
0.37
QLTI
0.66
5Y Dividends CAGR
NHS
1.63%
QLTI
N/A
NHS vs QLTI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
NHS
-0.29%
Winner
QLTI
+3.38%
3M
NHS
-8.31%
Winner
QLTI
+3.99%
6M
NHS
-5.95%
Winner
QLTI
+2.29%
1Y
NHS
-3.35%
Winner
QLTI
+3.58%
5Y(CAGR)
NHS
-1.58%
QLTI
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
NHS
+5.26%
QLTI
N/A
Max(CAGR)
Winner
NHS
+6.81%
QLTI
+5.13%
NHS vs QLTI - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NHS | QLTI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -8.36% | +0.31% |
| 2025 | +13.55% | +17.49% |
| 2024 | +10.34% | -8.17% |
| 2023 | +3.61% | N/A |
| 2022 | -23.51% | N/A |
| 2021 | +16.38% | N/A |
| 2020 | +5.34% | N/A |
| 2019 | +38.45% | N/A |
| 2018 | -11.00% | N/A |
| 2017 | +8.92% | N/A |
| 2016 | +26.03% | N/A |
| 2015 | -10.40% | N/A |
| 2014 | +0.67% | N/A |
| 2013 | +1.87% | N/A |
| 2012 | +9.26% | N/A |
| 2011 | +9.17% | N/A |
| 2010 | +24.93% | N/A |
| 2009 | +103.49% | N/A |
| 2008 | -37.64% | N/A |
| 2007 | -13.02% | N/A |
| 2006 | +6.05% | N/A |
| 2005 | +6.36% | N/A |
| 2004 | +15.56% | N/A |
| 2003 | +10.45% | N/A |
NHS vs QLTI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NHS was -64.75%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 577 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for QLTI was -14.82%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 52 trading sessions.
The current NHS drawdown is -14.24%. The current QLTI drawdown is -4.69%.
| Rank | NHS | QLTI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.75% Jun 4, 2007 - Sep 16, 2009 | -14.82% Mar 5, 2025 - May 19, 2025 |
| #2 | -43.00% Feb 21, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020 | -13.72% Feb 24, 2026 - Mar 27, 2026 |
| #3 | -37.40% Nov 12, 2021 - Feb 4, 2026 | -8.56% Oct 29, 2024 - Mar 5, 2025 |
| #4 | -24.62% Jun 30, 2014 - Aug 10, 2016 | -6.96% Oct 20, 2025 - Dec 26, 2025 |
| #5 | -21.48% May 26, 2011 - Feb 13, 2012 | -6.52% Jul 10, 2025 - Oct 2, 2025 |
| #6 | -18.05% Oct 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2019 | -4.29% Jun 12, 2025 - Jul 10, 2025 |
| #7 | -17.01% Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026 | -2.86% Oct 6, 2025 - Oct 16, 2025 |
| #8 | -15.06% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 24, 2010 | -2.59% Jan 27, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026 |
| #9 | -14.76% Mar 19, 2004 - Aug 30, 2004 | -2.10% Jan 12, 2026 - Jan 23, 2026 |
| #10 | -13.33% Sep 28, 2012 - Feb 26, 2014 | -1.31% Feb 10, 2026 - Feb 20, 2026 |
| #11 | -12.17% Jan 10, 2006 - Sep 20, 2006 | -0.97% May 27, 2025 - Jun 2, 2025 |
| #12 | -11.90% Dec 31, 2004 - Jul 8, 2005 | -0.87% Jun 2, 2025 - Jun 4, 2025 |
| #13 | -10.06% Oct 13, 2010 - Jan 31, 2011 | -0.87% May 20, 2025 - May 27, 2025 |
| #14 | -9.11% Oct 25, 2016 - Jan 4, 2017 | -0.82% Feb 20, 2026 - Feb 24, 2026 |
| #15 | -6.95% Sep 23, 2009 - Dec 14, 2009 | -0.51% Jun 10, 2025 - Jun 12, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between NHS and QLTI is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
0.74
-101
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
NHS vs QLTI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NHS | QLTI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 7.12% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 14.59% | 0.52% |
| 2024 | 14.49% | 0.19% |
| 2023 | 14.06% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 12.74% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 8.73% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 9.28% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 7.99% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 8.37% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 7.59% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 8.23% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 9.81% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 8.79% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 8.15% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 7.92% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 9.23% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 9.60% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 10.56% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 20.70% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 14.30% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 8.91% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 10.23% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 10.01% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 3.88% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: NHS vs SPYQLTI vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks