NHS vs GLO
Comparison between Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS, ETF) and Clough Global Opportunities Fund. (GLO, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceNHS has outperformed GLO, delivering a return of -1.8% compared to -2.6%
NHS vs GLO - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NHS vs GLO - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NHS vs GLO - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NHS | GLO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -8.80% | +8.51% |
| 2025 | +13.55% | +24.49% |
| 2024 | +10.34% | +23.14% |
| 2023 | +3.61% | +3.30% |
| 2022 | -23.51% | -45.57% |
| 2021 | +16.38% | +6.66% |
| 2020 | +5.34% | +31.79% |
| 2019 | +38.45% | +25.33% |
| 2018 | -11.00% | -16.44% |
| 2017 | +8.92% | +35.75% |
| 2016 | +26.03% | -1.84% |
| 2015 | -10.40% | -9.49% |
| 2014 | +0.67% | +11.62% |
| 2013 | +1.87% | +18.10% |
| 2012 | +9.26% | +19.84% |
| 2011 | +9.17% | -15.22% |
| 2010 | +24.93% | +10.71% |
| 2009 | +103.49% | +48.07% |
| 2008 | -37.64% | -46.95% |
| 2007 | -13.02% | +11.99% |
| 2006 | +6.05% | -6.80% |
| 2005 | +6.36% | N/A |
| 2004 | +15.56% | N/A |
| 2003 | +10.45% | N/A |
NHS vs GLO Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NHS was -64.75%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 577 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GLO was -60.53%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1160 trading sessions.
The current NHS drawdown is -14.65%. The current GLO drawdown is -20.41%.
| Rank | NHS | GLO |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.75% Jun 4, 2007 - Sep 16, 2009 | -60.53% Jun 5, 2008 - Jan 14, 2013 |
| #2 | -43.00% Feb 21, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020 | -58.44% Nov 8, 2021 - Oct 27, 2023 |
| #3 | -37.40% Nov 12, 2021 - Feb 4, 2026 | -44.43% Feb 21, 2020 - Aug 5, 2020 |
| #4 | -24.62% Jun 30, 2014 - Aug 10, 2016 | -30.06% Sep 4, 2018 - Jan 14, 2020 |
| #5 | -21.48% May 26, 2011 - Feb 13, 2012 | -25.75% Apr 15, 2015 - Apr 10, 2017 |
| #6 | -18.05% Oct 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2019 | -14.96% May 12, 2006 - Dec 24, 2007 |
| #7 | -17.01% Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026 | -14.13% Jan 3, 2008 - May 8, 2008 |
| #8 | -15.06% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 24, 2010 | -11.76% Jul 1, 2014 - Dec 31, 2014 |
| #9 | -14.76% Mar 19, 2004 - Aug 30, 2004 | -10.61% Oct 13, 2020 - Nov 16, 2020 |
| #10 | -13.33% Sep 28, 2012 - Feb 26, 2014 | -9.64% May 3, 2021 - Jun 29, 2021 |
| #11 | -12.17% Jan 10, 2006 - Sep 20, 2006 | -8.07% Nov 10, 2017 - Jan 23, 2018 |
| #12 | -11.90% Dec 31, 2004 - Jul 8, 2005 | -8.00% May 20, 2013 - Dec 23, 2013 |
| #13 | -10.06% Oct 13, 2010 - Jan 31, 2011 | -7.53% Aug 16, 2021 - Oct 28, 2021 |
| #14 | -9.11% Oct 25, 2016 - Jan 4, 2017 | -7.10% Jan 29, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018 |
| #15 | -6.95% Sep 23, 2009 - Dec 14, 2009 | -6.94% Jun 29, 2021 - Aug 5, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between NHS and GLO is 0.90 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
NHS vs GLO dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NHS | GLO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 7.16% | 4.54% |
| 2025 | 14.59% | 10.62% |
| 2024 | 14.49% | 11.25% |
| 2023 | 14.06% | 12.33% |
| 2022 | 12.74% | 22.32% |
| 2021 | 8.73% | 12.26% |
| 2020 | 9.28% | 9.69% |
| 2019 | 7.99% | 11.12% |
| 2018 | 8.37% | 14.48% |
| 2017 | 7.59% | 10.11% |
| 2016 | 8.23% | 12.63% |
| 2015 | 9.81% | 11.49% |
| 2014 | 8.79% | 11.00% |
| 2013 | 8.15% | 8.26% |
| 2012 | 7.92% | 9.20% |
| 2011 | 9.23% | 10.22% |
| 2010 | 9.60% | 8.03% |
| 2009 | 10.56% | 7.69% |
| 2008 | 20.70% | 16.35% |
| 2007 | 14.30% | 8.12% |
| 2006 | 8.91% | 3.30% |
| 2005 | 10.23% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 10.01% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 3.88% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks