StockComparison Logo
vs

NHS vs GLO

Comparison between Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS, ETF) and Clough Global Opportunities Fund. (GLO, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceNHS has outperformed GLO, delivering a return of -1.8% compared to -2.6%

NHS vs GLO - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
NHS
$285M
Winner
GLO
$285M
Max Drawdown
Winner
NHS
73.16%
GLO
79.67%
Sharpe Ratio
NHS
-0.45
Winner
GLO
1.38
5Y Beta
Winner
NHS
0.37
GLO
0.75
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
NHS
1.63%
GLO
-10.30%

NHS vs GLO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
NHS
-1.37%
Winner
GLO
+1.60%
3M
NHS
-13.07%
Winner
GLO
+5.84%
6M
NHS
-5.62%
Winner
GLO
+9.02%
1Y
NHS
-2.54%
Winner
GLO
+24.36%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
NHS
-1.79%
GLO
-2.58%
10Y(CAGR)
NHS
+5.27%
Winner
GLO
+7.13%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
NHS
+6.80%
GLO
+4.41%

NHS vs GLO - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearNHSGLO
2026-8.80%+8.51%
2025+13.55%+24.49%
2024+10.34%+23.14%
2023+3.61%+3.30%
2022-23.51%-45.57%
2021+16.38%+6.66%
2020+5.34%+31.79%
2019+38.45%+25.33%
2018-11.00%-16.44%
2017+8.92%+35.75%
2016+26.03%-1.84%
2015-10.40%-9.49%
2014+0.67%+11.62%
2013+1.87%+18.10%
2012+9.26%+19.84%
2011+9.17%-15.22%
2010+24.93%+10.71%
2009+103.49%+48.07%
2008-37.64%-46.95%
2007-13.02%+11.99%
2006+6.05%-6.80%
2005+6.36%N/A
2004+15.56%N/A
2003+10.45%N/A

NHS vs GLO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NHS was -64.75%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 577 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for GLO was -60.53%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1160 trading sessions.

The current NHS drawdown is -14.65%. The current GLO drawdown is -20.41%.

RankNHSGLO
#1-64.75%
Jun 4, 2007 - Sep 16, 2009
-60.53%
Jun 5, 2008 - Jan 14, 2013
#2-43.00%
Feb 21, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020
-58.44%
Nov 8, 2021 - Oct 27, 2023
#3-37.40%
Nov 12, 2021 - Feb 4, 2026
-44.43%
Feb 21, 2020 - Aug 5, 2020
#4-24.62%
Jun 30, 2014 - Aug 10, 2016
-30.06%
Sep 4, 2018 - Jan 14, 2020
#5-21.48%
May 26, 2011 - Feb 13, 2012
-25.75%
Apr 15, 2015 - Apr 10, 2017
#6-18.05%
Oct 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2019
-14.96%
May 12, 2006 - Dec 24, 2007
#7-17.01%
Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026
-14.13%
Jan 3, 2008 - May 8, 2008
#8-15.06%
Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 24, 2010
-11.76%
Jul 1, 2014 - Dec 31, 2014
#9-14.76%
Mar 19, 2004 - Aug 30, 2004
-10.61%
Oct 13, 2020 - Nov 16, 2020
#10-13.33%
Sep 28, 2012 - Feb 26, 2014
-9.64%
May 3, 2021 - Jun 29, 2021
#11-12.17%
Jan 10, 2006 - Sep 20, 2006
-8.07%
Nov 10, 2017 - Jan 23, 2018
#12-11.90%
Dec 31, 2004 - Jul 8, 2005
-8.00%
May 20, 2013 - Dec 23, 2013
#13-10.06%
Oct 13, 2010 - Jan 31, 2011
-7.53%
Aug 16, 2021 - Oct 28, 2021
#14-9.11%
Oct 25, 2016 - Jan 4, 2017
-7.10%
Jan 29, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018
#15-6.95%
Sep 23, 2009 - Dec 14, 2009
-6.94%
Jun 29, 2021 - Aug 5, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between NHS and GLO is 0.90 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.90
-101

Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)

NHS vs GLO dividend yield comparison.

YearNHSGLO
20267.16%4.54%
202514.59%10.62%
202414.49%11.25%
202314.06%12.33%
202212.74%22.32%
20218.73%12.26%
20209.28%9.69%
20197.99%11.12%
20188.37%14.48%
20177.59%10.11%
20168.23%12.63%
20159.81%11.49%
20148.79%11.00%
20138.15%8.26%
20127.92%9.20%
20119.23%10.22%
20109.60%8.03%
200910.56%7.69%
200820.70%16.35%
200714.30%8.12%
20068.91%3.30%
200510.23%0.00%
200410.01%0.00%
20033.88%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare