NEA vs SMMD
Comparison between Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA, ETF) and ISHARES RUSSELL 2500 ETF (SMMD, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceSMMD has outperformed NEA, delivering a return of +8.3% compared to -0.7%
NEA vs SMMD - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NEA vs SMMD - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NEA vs SMMD - Annual Returns (2002 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NEA | SMMD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.23% | +19.09% |
| 2025 | +10.42% | +11.99% |
| 2024 | +9.00% | +12.70% |
| 2023 | -0.58% | +18.42% |
| 2022 | -23.00% | -18.93% |
| 2021 | +8.45% | +19.93% |
| 2020 | +10.47% | +20.08% |
| 2019 | +20.56% | +28.05% |
| 2018 | -5.87% | -8.79% |
| 2017 | +9.35% | +10.82% |
| 2016 | +1.99% | N/A |
| 2015 | +6.25% | N/A |
| 2014 | +21.40% | N/A |
| 2013 | -16.42% | N/A |
| 2012 | +6.78% | N/A |
| 2011 | +17.35% | N/A |
| 2010 | +1.80% | N/A |
| 2009 | +34.36% | N/A |
| 2008 | -24.81% | N/A |
| 2007 | +5.52% | N/A |
| 2006 | +11.55% | N/A |
| 2005 | +4.15% | N/A |
| 2004 | -4.83% | N/A |
| 2003 | +8.59% | N/A |
| 2002 | +0.07% | N/A |
NEA vs SMMD Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NEA was -43.81%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 405 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SMMD was -41.06%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 183 trading sessions.
The current NEA drawdown is -5.71%. The current SMMD drawdown is -1.79%.
| Rank | NEA | SMMD |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -43.81% Feb 12, 2008 - Sep 21, 2009 | -41.06% Feb 20, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020 |
| #2 | -36.56% Sep 15, 2021 - Oct 23, 2023 | -28.24% Nov 8, 2021 - Jul 16, 2024 |
| #3 | -25.03% Mar 6, 2020 - Aug 10, 2020 | -25.49% Nov 25, 2024 - Sep 5, 2025 |
| #4 | -23.18% Nov 30, 2012 - Jan 7, 2015 | -25.07% Sep 6, 2018 - Nov 27, 2019 |
| #5 | -18.08% Sep 10, 2010 - Dec 2, 2011 | -9.66% Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 13, 2026 |
| #6 | -16.44% Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 29, 2005 | -8.98% Jan 29, 2018 - May 21, 2018 |
| #7 | -12.37% Jul 8, 2016 - Mar 7, 2019 | -8.60% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024 |
| #8 | -12.29% Feb 12, 2007 - Jan 15, 2008 | -7.49% Mar 15, 2021 - Apr 23, 2021 |
| #9 | -10.90% Jul 28, 2005 - Jul 12, 2006 | -7.41% Oct 27, 2025 - Dec 4, 2025 |
| #10 | -10.61% Jul 14, 2003 - Dec 31, 2003 | -7.11% Jun 25, 2021 - Sep 1, 2021 |
| #11 | -9.23% Feb 2, 2015 - Dec 24, 2015 | -6.17% Apr 28, 2021 - Jun 8, 2021 |
| #12 | -9.15% Oct 7, 2009 - Feb 2, 2010 | -5.78% Feb 24, 2021 - Mar 11, 2021 |
| #13 | -6.54% Mar 12, 2012 - May 16, 2012 | -4.76% Sep 2, 2021 - Oct 21, 2021 |
| #14 | -4.92% Jan 27, 2021 - Apr 13, 2021 | -4.71% Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021 |
| #15 | -4.73% Nov 30, 2006 - Feb 12, 2007 | -4.29% Jul 26, 2017 - Sep 18, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between NEA and SMMD is 0.67 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
NEA vs SMMD dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NEA | SMMD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.20% | 0.45% |
| 2025 | 7.36% | 1.28% |
| 2024 | 6.63% | 1.27% |
| 2023 | 3.95% | 1.44% |
| 2022 | 5.49% | 1.79% |
| 2021 | 4.50% | 1.12% |
| 2020 | 4.45% | 1.31% |
| 2019 | 4.46% | 1.50% |
| 2018 | 5.40% | 2.45% |
| 2017 | 5.33% | 0.68% |
| 2016 | 5.70% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 5.71% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 5.95% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 6.24% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 5.65% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 5.64% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 6.09% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 5.37% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 6.81% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 4.93% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.10% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 5.93% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.81% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.11% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks