NEA vs NAD
Comparison between Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA, ETF) and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceNEA has outperformed NAD, delivering a return of -0.1% compared to -0.2%
NEA vs NAD - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NEA vs NAD - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NEA vs NAD - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NEA | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.65% | +0.50% |
| 2025 | +10.42% | +9.76% |
| 2024 | +9.00% | +8.94% |
| 2023 | -0.58% | -0.28% |
| 2022 | -23.00% | -22.45% |
| 2021 | +8.45% | +10.21% |
| 2020 | +10.47% | +10.73% |
| 2019 | +20.56% | +20.11% |
| 2018 | -5.87% | -5.76% |
| 2017 | +9.35% | +5.98% |
| 2016 | +1.99% | +2.05% |
| 2015 | +6.25% | +7.80% |
| 2014 | +21.40% | +19.78% |
| 2013 | -16.42% | -15.11% |
| 2012 | +6.78% | +12.07% |
| 2011 | +17.35% | +21.18% |
| 2010 | +1.80% | +1.99% |
| 2009 | +34.36% | +38.25% |
| 2008 | -24.81% | -21.38% |
| 2007 | +5.52% | -10.97% |
| 2006 | +11.55% | +13.53% |
| 2005 | +4.15% | +4.63% |
| 2004 | -4.83% | +2.48% |
| 2003 | +8.59% | +11.63% |
| 2002 | +0.07% | +9.42% |
| 2001 | N/A | +7.43% |
| 2000 | N/A | +15.65% |
| 1999 | N/A | -11.78% |
NEA vs NAD Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NEA was -43.81%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 405 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NAD was -44.61%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 663 trading sessions.
The current NEA drawdown is -5.33%. The current NAD drawdown is -5.43%.
| Rank | NEA | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -43.81% Feb 12, 2008 - Sep 21, 2009 | -44.61% Jan 22, 2007 - Sep 8, 2009 |
| #2 | -36.56% Sep 15, 2021 - Oct 23, 2023 | -35.57% Sep 15, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023 |
| #3 | -25.03% Mar 6, 2020 - Aug 10, 2020 | -25.39% Mar 6, 2020 - Nov 16, 2020 |
| #4 | -23.18% Nov 30, 2012 - Jan 7, 2015 | -21.47% Nov 30, 2012 - Dec 4, 2014 |
| #5 | -18.08% Sep 10, 2010 - Dec 2, 2011 | -18.90% Sep 1, 2010 - Nov 22, 2011 |
| #6 | -16.44% Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 29, 2005 | -17.47% Mar 9, 2004 - Jun 7, 2005 |
| #7 | -12.37% Jul 8, 2016 - Mar 7, 2019 | -15.78% Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 8, 2000 |
| #8 | -12.29% Feb 12, 2007 - Jan 15, 2008 | -15.38% Aug 12, 2016 - May 13, 2019 |
| #9 | -10.90% Jul 28, 2005 - Jul 12, 2006 | -10.12% Jun 17, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004 |
| #10 | -10.61% Jul 14, 2003 - Dec 31, 2003 | -9.48% Nov 6, 2001 - Jun 7, 2002 |
| #11 | -9.23% Feb 2, 2015 - Dec 24, 2015 | -9.39% Oct 4, 2002 - May 1, 2003 |
| #12 | -9.15% Oct 7, 2009 - Feb 2, 2010 | -8.80% Sep 9, 2005 - Aug 17, 2006 |
| #13 | -6.54% Mar 12, 2012 - May 16, 2012 | -8.02% Oct 8, 2009 - Feb 1, 2010 |
| #14 | -4.92% Jan 27, 2021 - Apr 13, 2021 | -6.14% Jan 30, 2015 - Nov 3, 2015 |
| #15 | -4.73% Nov 30, 2006 - Feb 12, 2007 | -5.87% Mar 1, 2012 - May 3, 2012 |
Correlation
Correlation between NEA and NAD is 1.00 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NEA vs NAD dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NEA | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.96% | 3.00% |
| 2025 | 7.36% | 7.37% |
| 2024 | 6.63% | 6.63% |
| 2023 | 3.95% | 4.13% |
| 2022 | 5.49% | 5.58% |
| 2021 | 4.50% | 4.43% |
| 2020 | 4.45% | 4.41% |
| 2019 | 4.46% | 4.40% |
| 2018 | 5.40% | 5.37% |
| 2017 | 5.33% | 5.42% |
| 2016 | 5.70% | 6.05% |
| 2015 | 5.71% | 5.96% |
| 2014 | 5.95% | 6.20% |
| 2013 | 6.24% | 7.10% |
| 2012 | 5.65% | 5.43% |
| 2011 | 5.64% | 6.07% |
| 2010 | 6.09% | 7.07% |
| 2009 | 5.37% | 6.27% |
| 2008 | 6.81% | 7.76% |
| 2007 | 4.93% | 5.99% |
| 2006 | 5.10% | 5.41% |
| 2005 | 5.93% | 6.70% |
| 2004 | 6.81% | 6.90% |
| 2003 | 6.11% | 6.47% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 6.35% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 6.14% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 2.50% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks