NEA vs CQQQ
Comparison between Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA, ETF) and INVESCO CHINA TECHNOLOGY ETF (CQQQ, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceNEA has outperformed CQQQ, delivering a return of -0.8% compared to -4.9%
NEA vs CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NEA vs CQQQ - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NEA vs CQQQ - Annual Returns (2002 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NEA | CQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +2.22% | -2.30% |
| 2025 | +10.42% | +38.47% |
| 2024 | +9.00% | +13.15% |
| 2023 | -0.58% | -20.50% |
| 2022 | -23.00% | -29.95% |
| 2021 | +8.45% | -25.23% |
| 2020 | +10.47% | +49.54% |
| 2019 | +20.56% | +33.47% |
| 2018 | -5.87% | -37.28% |
| 2017 | +9.35% | +72.46% |
| 2016 | +1.99% | +3.44% |
| 2015 | +6.25% | +6.25% |
| 2014 | +21.40% | -1.04% |
| 2013 | -16.42% | +54.39% |
| 2012 | +6.78% | +8.40% |
| 2011 | +17.35% | -25.11% |
| 2010 | +1.80% | +3.59% |
| 2009 | +34.36% | +3.24% |
| 2008 | -24.81% | N/A |
| 2007 | +5.52% | N/A |
| 2006 | +11.55% | N/A |
| 2005 | +4.15% | N/A |
| 2004 | -4.83% | N/A |
| 2003 | +8.59% | N/A |
| 2002 | +0.07% | N/A |
NEA vs CQQQ Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NEA was -43.81%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 405 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CQQQ was -73.98%, occurring on Feb 2, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current NEA drawdown is -4.79%. The current CQQQ drawdown is -49.38%.
| Rank | NEA | CQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -43.81% Feb 12, 2008 - Sep 21, 2009 | -73.98% Feb 16, 2021 - Feb 2, 2024 |
| #2 | -36.56% Sep 15, 2021 - Oct 23, 2023 | -43.04% Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 6, 2020 |
| #3 | -25.03% Mar 6, 2020 - Aug 10, 2020 | -41.76% Apr 20, 2011 - Sep 10, 2013 |
| #4 | -23.18% Nov 30, 2012 - Jan 7, 2015 | -38.76% May 19, 2015 - Apr 28, 2017 |
| #5 | -18.08% Sep 10, 2010 - Dec 2, 2011 | -21.93% Mar 6, 2014 - Apr 2, 2015 |
| #6 | -16.44% Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 29, 2005 | -18.66% Apr 9, 2010 - Oct 18, 2010 |
| #7 | -12.37% Jul 8, 2016 - Mar 7, 2019 | -14.19% Jan 14, 2010 - Mar 17, 2010 |
| #8 | -12.29% Feb 12, 2007 - Jan 15, 2008 | -13.59% Nov 22, 2017 - Jan 26, 2018 |
| #9 | -10.90% Jul 28, 2005 - Jul 12, 2006 | -10.09% Jan 22, 2014 - Mar 4, 2014 |
| #10 | -10.61% Jul 14, 2003 - Dec 31, 2003 | -9.29% Jul 9, 2020 - Oct 12, 2020 |
| #11 | -9.23% Feb 2, 2015 - Dec 24, 2015 | -8.94% Oct 21, 2013 - Dec 31, 2013 |
| #12 | -9.15% Oct 7, 2009 - Feb 2, 2010 | -8.07% Feb 17, 2011 - Apr 4, 2011 |
| #13 | -6.54% Mar 12, 2012 - May 16, 2012 | -7.04% Nov 8, 2010 - Jan 13, 2011 |
| #14 | -4.92% Jan 27, 2021 - Apr 13, 2021 | -6.56% Jan 25, 2021 - Feb 8, 2021 |
| #15 | -4.73% Nov 30, 2006 - Feb 12, 2007 | -5.62% Sep 18, 2017 - Oct 3, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between NEA and CQQQ is 0.79 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
NEA vs CQQQ dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NEA | CQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.16% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 7.36% | 2.17% |
| 2024 | 6.63% | 0.28% |
| 2023 | 3.95% | 0.55% |
| 2022 | 5.49% | 0.08% |
| 2021 | 4.50% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 4.45% | 0.47% |
| 2019 | 4.46% | 0.01% |
| 2018 | 5.40% | 0.43% |
| 2017 | 5.33% | 1.41% |
| 2016 | 5.70% | 1.69% |
| 2015 | 5.71% | 1.77% |
| 2014 | 5.95% | 1.00% |
| 2013 | 6.24% | 0.79% |
| 2012 | 5.65% | 1.91% |
| 2011 | 5.64% | 2.77% |
| 2010 | 6.09% | 0.48% |
| 2009 | 5.37% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 6.81% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 4.93% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.10% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 5.93% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.81% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.11% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks