NAZ vs CIK
Comparison between Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ, ETF) and Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund Inc (CIK, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceCIK has outperformed NAZ, delivering a return of +2.6% compared to +0.6%
NAZ vs CIK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NAZ vs CIK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NAZ vs CIK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NAZ | CIK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +9.33% | -8.58% |
| 2025 | +11.54% | +7.14% |
| 2024 | +12.88% | +5.40% |
| 2023 | -1.90% | +35.36% |
| 2022 | -27.11% | -20.82% |
| 2021 | +5.02% | +19.34% |
| 2020 | +22.04% | +6.85% |
| 2019 | +16.46% | +25.89% |
| 2018 | -12.82% | -8.39% |
| 2017 | +5.58% | +13.04% |
| 2016 | -3.17% | +23.48% |
| 2015 | +11.35% | -7.33% |
| 2014 | +25.72% | -0.10% |
| 2013 | -16.80% | -6.22% |
| 2012 | +14.38% | +19.19% |
| 2011 | +17.63% | +12.25% |
| 2010 | +3.58% | +15.26% |
| 2009 | +40.86% | +58.36% |
| 2008 | -22.86% | -24.93% |
| 2007 | -4.82% | -10.40% |
| 2006 | -0.29% | +27.13% |
| 2005 | -0.39% | -9.37% |
| 2004 | +0.02% | +7.88% |
| 2003 | +11.61% | +26.34% |
| 2002 | +0.75% | -14.24% |
| 2001 | +6.83% | +0.33% |
| 2000 | +15.21% | -3.89% |
| 1999 | -9.75% | -3.96% |
NAZ vs CIK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NAZ was -38.28%, occurring on Oct 25, 2023. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CIK was -54.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.
The current NAZ drawdown is -4.93%. The current CIK drawdown is -12.39%.
| Rank | NAZ | CIK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -38.28% Nov 9, 2021 - Apr 14, 2026 | -54.28% May 16, 2007 - Dec 21, 2009 |
| #2 | -34.81% Apr 1, 2004 - Sep 22, 2009 | -39.09% Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020 |
| #3 | -28.08% Jul 6, 2016 - Sep 1, 2020 | -36.18% Jan 15, 2002 - May 31, 2005 |
| #4 | -27.21% Jan 28, 2013 - Jan 28, 2015 | -26.94% Jan 29, 2001 - Jan 15, 2002 |
| #5 | -20.06% Oct 29, 2010 - Dec 30, 2011 | -26.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 26, 2023 |
| #6 | -13.78% Jul 11, 2002 - Jun 12, 2003 | -24.22% May 3, 2013 - Dec 12, 2016 |
| #7 | -13.30% Jul 15, 2003 - Feb 2, 2004 | -21.26% Jul 13, 2005 - Sep 28, 2006 |
| #8 | -11.33% Nov 4, 1999 - Dec 11, 2000 | -20.19% Aug 18, 2000 - Jan 26, 2001 |
| #9 | -6.87% Jan 14, 2010 - Aug 12, 2010 | -17.34% May 27, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012 |
| #10 | -6.81% Dec 4, 2020 - May 28, 2021 | -15.65% Jul 25, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023 |
| #11 | -6.52% Jun 5, 2026 - Jun 29, 2026 | -15.49% Oct 7, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026 |
| #12 | -5.89% Oct 6, 2009 - Jan 6, 2010 | -15.16% Oct 3, 2018 - Mar 20, 2019 |
| #13 | -4.81% Mar 5, 2002 - Apr 23, 2002 | -14.29% May 3, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010 |
| #14 | -4.69% Oct 3, 2012 - Jan 9, 2013 | -12.39% Feb 2, 2000 - Jul 17, 2000 |
| #15 | -4.65% Feb 2, 2015 - Apr 17, 2015 | -11.87% Nov 2, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between NAZ and CIK is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NAZ vs CIK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NAZ | CIK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.60% | 5.89% |
| 2025 | 7.09% | 9.54% |
| 2024 | 6.20% | 9.34% |
| 2023 | 3.63% | 8.63% |
| 2022 | 5.01% | 10.71% |
| 2021 | 3.75% | 7.87% |
| 2020 | 3.52% | 8.57% |
| 2019 | 3.82% | 8.39% |
| 2018 | 4.52% | 9.64% |
| 2017 | 4.65% | 7.98% |
| 2016 | 5.53% | 8.35% |
| 2015 | 5.25% | 9.50% |
| 2014 | 5.53% | 8.39% |
| 2013 | 6.35% | 8.34% |
| 2012 | 5.01% | 7.89% |
| 2011 | 5.35% | 7.99% |
| 2010 | 5.76% | 9.82% |
| 2009 | 5.11% | 9.40% |
| 2008 | 6.72% | 18.80% |
| 2007 | 4.90% | 9.22% |
| 2006 | 4.62% | 9.13% |
| 2005 | 5.41% | 10.76% |
| 2004 | 5.95% | 9.44% |
| 2003 | 5.68% | 10.00% |
| 2002 | 5.93% | 18.04% |
| 2001 | 5.35% | 14.46% |
| 2000 | 2.21% | 5.45% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks