StockComparison Logo
vs

CIK vs MFEM

Comparison between Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund Inc (CIK, ETF) and PIMCO RAFI DYNAMIC MULTI-FACTOR EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF (MFEM, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceMFEM has outperformed CIK, delivering a return of +7.6% compared to +2.6%

CIK vs MFEM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
Winner
CIK
$150M
MFEM
$150M
Expense Ratio
CIK
N/A
MFEM
0.49%
Max Drawdown
CIK
74.29%
Winner
MFEM
48.84%
Sharpe Ratio
CIK
-1.10
Winner
MFEM
1.15
5Y Beta
Winner
CIK
0.38
MFEM
0.75
5Y Dividends CAGR
CIK
-0.87%
Winner
MFEM
6.35%

CIK vs MFEM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CIK
+0.41%
MFEM
-7.15%
3M
CIK
-1.93%
Winner
MFEM
+1.65%
6M
CIK
-9.14%
Winner
MFEM
+9.70%
1Y
CIK
-8.35%
Winner
MFEM
+29.45%
5Y(CAGR)
CIK
+2.61%
Winner
MFEM
+7.63%
10Y(CAGR)
CIK
+7.11%
Winner
MFEM
+7.13%
Max(CAGR)
CIK
+5.97%
Winner
MFEM
+7.13%

CIK vs MFEM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCIKMFEM
2026-8.58%+17.17%
2025+7.14%+25.82%
2024+5.40%+6.16%
2023+35.36%+14.55%
2022-20.82%-20.63%
2021+19.34%+10.12%
2020+6.85%+9.82%
2019+25.89%+14.99%
2018-8.39%-15.89%
2017+13.04%+4.82%
2016+23.48%N/A
2015-7.33%N/A
2014-0.10%N/A
2013-6.22%N/A
2012+19.19%N/A
2011+12.25%N/A
2010+15.26%N/A
2009+58.36%N/A
2008-24.93%N/A
2007-10.40%N/A
2006+27.13%N/A
2005-9.37%N/A
2004+7.88%N/A
2003+26.34%N/A
2002-14.24%N/A
2001+0.33%N/A
2000-3.89%N/A
1999-3.96%N/A

CIK vs MFEM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CIK was -54.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for MFEM was -43.32%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 735 trading sessions.

The current CIK drawdown is -12.39%. The current MFEM drawdown is -10.46%.

RankCIKMFEM
#1-54.28%
May 16, 2007 - Dec 21, 2009
-43.32%
Jan 26, 2018 - Dec 28, 2020
#2-39.09%
Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020
-31.39%
Jun 4, 2021 - Sep 26, 2024
#3-36.18%
Jan 15, 2002 - May 31, 2005
-19.22%
Oct 7, 2024 - Jun 24, 2025
#4-26.94%
Jan 29, 2001 - Jan 15, 2002
-12.86%
Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
#5-26.22%
Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 26, 2023
-12.71%
Jun 2, 2026 - Jul 20, 2026
#6-24.22%
May 3, 2013 - Dec 12, 2016
-7.46%
Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 27, 2021
#7-21.26%
Jul 13, 2005 - Sep 28, 2006
-6.04%
Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021
#8-20.19%
Aug 18, 2000 - Jan 26, 2001
-6.02%
May 11, 2026 - May 26, 2026
#9-17.34%
May 27, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012
-4.76%
May 7, 2021 - May 28, 2021
#10-15.65%
Jul 25, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023
-4.46%
Sep 17, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025
#11-15.49%
Oct 7, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026
-4.16%
Nov 12, 2025 - Dec 26, 2025
#12-15.16%
Oct 3, 2018 - Mar 20, 2019
-3.96%
Sep 11, 2017 - Oct 16, 2017
#13-14.29%
May 3, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010
-3.68%
Nov 24, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017
#14-12.39%
Feb 2, 2000 - Jul 17, 2000
-3.64%
Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 12, 2025
#15-11.87%
Nov 2, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013
-3.51%
Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between CIK and MFEM is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.80
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CIK vs MFEM dividend yield comparison.

YearCIKMFEM
20265.89%1.25%
20259.54%2.77%
20249.34%5.89%
20238.63%4.01%
202210.71%7.01%
20217.87%29.96%
20208.57%1.70%
20198.39%2.37%
20189.64%1.18%
20177.98%0.21%
20168.35%0.00%
20159.50%0.00%
20148.39%0.00%
20138.34%0.00%
20127.89%0.00%
20117.99%0.00%
20109.82%0.00%
20099.40%0.00%
200818.80%0.00%
20079.22%0.00%
20069.13%0.00%
200510.76%0.00%
20049.44%0.00%
200310.00%0.00%
200218.04%0.00%
200114.46%0.00%
20005.45%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare