CIK vs MFEM
Comparison between Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund Inc (CIK, ETF) and PIMCO RAFI DYNAMIC MULTI-FACTOR EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF (MFEM, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceMFEM has outperformed CIK, delivering a return of +7.6% compared to +2.6%
CIK vs MFEM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CIK vs MFEM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CIK vs MFEM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CIK | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -8.58% | +17.17% |
| 2025 | +7.14% | +25.82% |
| 2024 | +5.40% | +6.16% |
| 2023 | +35.36% | +14.55% |
| 2022 | -20.82% | -20.63% |
| 2021 | +19.34% | +10.12% |
| 2020 | +6.85% | +9.82% |
| 2019 | +25.89% | +14.99% |
| 2018 | -8.39% | -15.89% |
| 2017 | +13.04% | +4.82% |
| 2016 | +23.48% | N/A |
| 2015 | -7.33% | N/A |
| 2014 | -0.10% | N/A |
| 2013 | -6.22% | N/A |
| 2012 | +19.19% | N/A |
| 2011 | +12.25% | N/A |
| 2010 | +15.26% | N/A |
| 2009 | +58.36% | N/A |
| 2008 | -24.93% | N/A |
| 2007 | -10.40% | N/A |
| 2006 | +27.13% | N/A |
| 2005 | -9.37% | N/A |
| 2004 | +7.88% | N/A |
| 2003 | +26.34% | N/A |
| 2002 | -14.24% | N/A |
| 2001 | +0.33% | N/A |
| 2000 | -3.89% | N/A |
| 1999 | -3.96% | N/A |
CIK vs MFEM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CIK was -54.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MFEM was -43.32%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 735 trading sessions.
The current CIK drawdown is -12.39%. The current MFEM drawdown is -10.46%.
| Rank | CIK | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -54.28% May 16, 2007 - Dec 21, 2009 | -43.32% Jan 26, 2018 - Dec 28, 2020 |
| #2 | -39.09% Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020 | -31.39% Jun 4, 2021 - Sep 26, 2024 |
| #3 | -36.18% Jan 15, 2002 - May 31, 2005 | -19.22% Oct 7, 2024 - Jun 24, 2025 |
| #4 | -26.94% Jan 29, 2001 - Jan 15, 2002 | -12.86% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026 |
| #5 | -26.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 26, 2023 | -12.71% Jun 2, 2026 - Jul 20, 2026 |
| #6 | -24.22% May 3, 2013 - Dec 12, 2016 | -7.46% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 27, 2021 |
| #7 | -21.26% Jul 13, 2005 - Sep 28, 2006 | -6.04% Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021 |
| #8 | -20.19% Aug 18, 2000 - Jan 26, 2001 | -6.02% May 11, 2026 - May 26, 2026 |
| #9 | -17.34% May 27, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012 | -4.76% May 7, 2021 - May 28, 2021 |
| #10 | -15.65% Jul 25, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023 | -4.46% Sep 17, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025 |
| #11 | -15.49% Oct 7, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026 | -4.16% Nov 12, 2025 - Dec 26, 2025 |
| #12 | -15.16% Oct 3, 2018 - Mar 20, 2019 | -3.96% Sep 11, 2017 - Oct 16, 2017 |
| #13 | -14.29% May 3, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010 | -3.68% Nov 24, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017 |
| #14 | -12.39% Feb 2, 2000 - Jul 17, 2000 | -3.64% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 12, 2025 |
| #15 | -11.87% Nov 2, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013 | -3.51% Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026 |
Correlation
Correlation between CIK and MFEM is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CIK vs MFEM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CIK | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5.89% | 1.25% |
| 2025 | 9.54% | 2.77% |
| 2024 | 9.34% | 5.89% |
| 2023 | 8.63% | 4.01% |
| 2022 | 10.71% | 7.01% |
| 2021 | 7.87% | 29.96% |
| 2020 | 8.57% | 1.70% |
| 2019 | 8.39% | 2.37% |
| 2018 | 9.64% | 1.18% |
| 2017 | 7.98% | 0.21% |
| 2016 | 8.35% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 9.50% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 8.39% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 8.34% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 7.89% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 7.99% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 9.82% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 9.40% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 18.80% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 9.22% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 9.13% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 10.76% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 9.44% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 10.00% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 18.04% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 14.46% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 5.45% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks