CIK vs NAZ

Comparison between Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund Inc (CIK, ETF) and Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCIK has outperformed NAZ, delivering a return of +2.4% compared to +0.2%

CIK vs NAZ - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CIK(ETF)	NAZ(ETF)
Net Assets	$150M	$150M
Max Drawdown	74.29%	48.77%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.04	0.85
5Y Beta	0.38	0.12
5Y Dividends CAGR	-0.87%	7.61%

Net Assets

CIK

$150M

Winner

NAZ

$150M

Max Drawdown

CIK

74.29%

Winner

NAZ

48.77%

Sharpe Ratio

CIK

-1.04

Winner

NAZ

0.85

5Y Beta

CIK

0.38

Winner

NAZ

0.12

5Y Dividends CAGR

CIK

-0.87%

Winner

NAZ

7.61%

CIK vs NAZ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CIK	NAZ
1 month	+0.82%	-0.64%
3 months	-1.95%	-0.13%
6 months	-9.67%	+5.77%
1 year	-8.10%	+12.47%
5 years(CAGR)	+2.35%	+0.20%
10 years(CAGR)	+7.10%	+1.52%
Max(CAGR)	+5.95%	+4.24%

Winner

CIK

+0.82%

NAZ

-0.64%

CIK

-1.95%

Winner

NAZ

-0.13%

CIK

-9.67%

Winner

NAZ

+5.77%

CIK

-8.10%

Winner

NAZ

+12.47%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

CIK

+2.35%

NAZ

+0.20%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

CIK

+7.10%

NAZ

+1.52%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CIK

+5.95%

NAZ

+4.24%

CIK vs NAZ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CIK	NAZ
2026	-8.96%	+7.33%
2025	+7.14%	+11.54%
2024	+5.40%	+12.88%
2023	+35.36%	-1.90%
2022	-20.82%	-27.11%
2021	+19.34%	+5.02%
2020	+6.85%	+22.04%
2019	+25.89%	+16.46%
2018	-8.39%	-12.82%
2017	+13.04%	+5.58%
2016	+23.48%	-3.17%
2015	-7.33%	+11.35%
2014	-0.10%	+25.72%
2013	-6.22%	-16.80%
2012	+19.19%	+14.38%
2011	+12.25%	+17.63%
2010	+15.26%	+3.58%
2009	+58.36%	+40.86%
2008	-24.93%	-22.86%
2007	-10.40%	-4.82%
2006	+27.13%	-0.29%
2005	-9.37%	-0.39%
2004	+7.88%	+0.02%
2003	+26.34%	+11.61%
2002	-14.24%	+0.75%
2001	+0.33%	+6.83%
2000	-3.89%	+15.21%
1999	-3.96%	-9.75%

CIK vs NAZ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CIK was -54.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for NAZ was -38.28%, occurring on Oct 25, 2023. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.

The current CIK drawdown is -12.75%. The current NAZ drawdown is -6.67%.

Rank	CIK	NAZ
#1	-54.28% May 16, 2007 - Dec 21, 2009	-38.28% Nov 9, 2021 - Apr 14, 2026
#2	-39.09% Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020	-34.81% Apr 1, 2004 - Sep 22, 2009
#3	-36.18% Jan 15, 2002 - May 31, 2005	-28.08% Jul 6, 2016 - Sep 1, 2020
#4	-26.94% Jan 29, 2001 - Jan 15, 2002	-27.21% Jan 28, 2013 - Jan 28, 2015
#5	-26.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 26, 2023	-20.06% Oct 29, 2010 - Dec 30, 2011
#6	-24.22% May 3, 2013 - Dec 12, 2016	-13.78% Jul 11, 2002 - Jun 12, 2003
#7	-21.26% Jul 13, 2005 - Sep 28, 2006	-13.30% Jul 15, 2003 - Feb 2, 2004
#8	-20.19% Aug 18, 2000 - Jan 26, 2001	-11.33% Nov 4, 1999 - Dec 11, 2000
#9	-17.34% May 27, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012	-6.87% Jan 14, 2010 - Aug 12, 2010
#10	-15.65% Jul 25, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023	-6.81% Dec 4, 2020 - May 28, 2021
#11	-15.49% Oct 7, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026	-6.67% Jun 5, 2026 - Jul 23, 2026
#12	-15.16% Oct 3, 2018 - Mar 20, 2019	-5.89% Oct 6, 2009 - Jan 6, 2010
#13	-14.29% May 3, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010	-4.81% Mar 5, 2002 - Apr 23, 2002
#14	-12.39% Feb 2, 2000 - Jul 17, 2000	-4.69% Oct 3, 2012 - Jan 9, 2013
#15	-11.87% Nov 2, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013	-4.65% Feb 2, 2015 - Apr 17, 2015

Correlation

Correlation between CIK and NAZ is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.91

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CIK vs NAZ dividend yield comparison.

Year	CIK	NAZ
2026	5.92%	3.66%
2025	9.54%	7.09%
2024	9.34%	6.20%
2023	8.63%	3.63%
2022	10.71%	5.01%
2021	7.87%	3.75%
2020	8.57%	3.52%
2019	8.39%	3.82%
2018	9.64%	4.52%
2017	7.98%	4.65%
2016	8.35%	5.53%
2015	9.50%	5.25%
2014	8.39%	5.53%
2013	8.34%	6.35%
2012	7.89%	5.01%
2011	7.99%	5.35%
2010	9.82%	5.76%
2009	9.40%	5.11%
2008	18.80%	6.72%
2007	9.22%	4.90%
2006	9.13%	4.62%
2005	10.76%	5.41%
2004	9.44%	5.95%
2003	10.00%	5.68%
2002	18.04%	5.93%
2001	14.46%	5.35%
2000	5.45%	2.21%