MTB vs UAL
Comparison between M & T Bank Corp (MTB, Company) and United Airlines Holdings Inc (UAL, Company).
MTB is from the Financial Services sector, while UAL is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceUAL has outperformed MTB, delivering a return of +12.7% compared to +8.9%
MTB vs UAL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MTB vs UAL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MTB vs UAL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MTB | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +4.68% | -11.88% |
| 2025 | +10.48% | +17.17% |
| 2024 | +39.71% | +138.46% |
| 2023 | -1.61% | +10.88% |
| 2022 | -5.85% | -17.12% |
| 2021 | +24.76% | +5.16% |
| 2020 | -22.69% | -51.81% |
| 2019 | +20.18% | +4.64% |
| 2018 | -14.69% | +21.45% |
| 2017 | +11.15% | -7.30% |
| 2016 | +36.28% | +31.06% |
| 2015 | -1.12% | -13.63% |
| 2014 | +11.72% | +77.29% |
| 2013 | +18.22% | +56.39% |
| 2012 | +30.33% | +23.70% |
| 2011 | -10.03% | -24.91% |
| 2010 | +34.50% | +86.09% |
| 2009 | +23.24% | +8.76% |
| 2008 | -25.55% | -63.01% |
| 2007 | -31.82% | -23.08% |
| 2006 | +12.19% | +29.79% |
| 2005 | +4.73% | N/A |
| 2004 | +12.23% | N/A |
| 2003 | +22.06% | N/A |
| 2002 | +10.99% | N/A |
| 2001 | +13.92% | N/A |
| 2000 | +69.50% | N/A |
| 1999 | -16.09% | N/A |
MTB vs UAL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MTB was -73.52%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for UAL was -93.47%, occurring on Jul 15, 2008. Recovery took 1572 trading sessions.
The current MTB drawdown is -10.26%. The current UAL drawdown is -15.27%.
| Rank | MTB | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -73.52% Feb 20, 2007 - Oct 17, 2012 | -93.47% Oct 23, 2007 - Jan 22, 2014 |
| #2 | -52.97% Mar 9, 2018 - Jan 7, 2022 | -79.40% Nov 30, 2018 - Nov 25, 2024 |
| #3 | -40.69% Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 | -49.19% Jan 21, 2025 - Dec 16, 2025 |
| #4 | -28.19% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 8, 2026 | -48.72% Jan 26, 2015 - Dec 9, 2016 |
| #5 | -26.75% Nov 2, 1999 - Aug 4, 2000 | -47.63% Mar 22, 2006 - Nov 22, 2006 |
| #6 | -23.95% May 17, 2002 - May 30, 2003 | -35.17% Jan 16, 2007 - Oct 23, 2007 |
| #7 | -23.47% Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016 | -30.27% Jun 2, 2017 - Aug 7, 2018 |
| #8 | -19.77% Jul 20, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002 | -27.50% Jan 6, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026 |
| #9 | -18.02% Feb 16, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022 | -21.63% Sep 10, 2014 - Oct 28, 2014 |
| #10 | -16.99% Feb 6, 2026 - Mar 19, 2026 | -21.47% Jan 22, 2014 - Aug 20, 2014 |
| #11 | -16.08% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 1, 2017 | -14.16% Dec 20, 2016 - May 9, 2017 |
| #12 | -15.04% Dec 30, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004 | -12.62% Sep 14, 2018 - Nov 7, 2018 |
| #13 | -13.61% Jan 14, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022 | -10.71% Dec 5, 2024 - Jan 8, 2025 |
| #14 | -12.43% Mar 7, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001 | -8.93% Nov 24, 2006 - Dec 11, 2006 |
| #15 | -12.30% Dec 5, 2014 - Mar 20, 2015 | -6.34% Dec 11, 2014 - Dec 30, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between MTB and UAL is 0.83 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MTB vs UAL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MTB | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.71% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 3.24% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 2.85% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 3.79% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 3.31% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 2.93% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 3.46% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.42% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 2.48% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.75% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.31% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 2.23% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 2.41% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 3.67% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 3.22% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 4.19% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 4.88% | 19.51% |
| 2007 | 3.19% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.84% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.60% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.48% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.92% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.30% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks