MTB vs SHG
Comparison between M & T Bank Corp (MTB, Company) and Shinhan Financial Group Co. Ltd (SHG, Company).
Both MTB and SHG are from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceSHG has outperformed MTB, delivering a return of +17.4% compared to +8.9%
MTB vs SHG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MTB vs SHG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MTB vs SHG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MTB | SHG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +4.68% | +26.88% |
| 2025 | +10.48% | +69.11% |
| 2024 | +39.71% | +15.84% |
| 2023 | -1.61% | +17.13% |
| 2022 | -5.85% | -6.24% |
| 2021 | +24.76% | +7.08% |
| 2020 | -22.69% | -20.53% |
| 2019 | +20.18% | +6.85% |
| 2018 | -14.69% | -24.17% |
| 2017 | +11.15% | +20.58% |
| 2016 | +36.28% | +18.27% |
| 2015 | -1.12% | -12.54% |
| 2014 | +11.72% | -5.79% |
| 2013 | +18.22% | +20.99% |
| 2012 | +30.33% | +5.40% |
| 2011 | -10.03% | -27.22% |
| 2010 | +34.50% | +23.61% |
| 2009 | +23.24% | +66.46% |
| 2008 | -25.55% | -56.99% |
| 2007 | -31.82% | +14.12% |
| 2006 | +12.19% | +24.67% |
| 2005 | +4.73% | +83.24% |
| 2004 | +12.23% | +45.79% |
| 2003 | +22.06% | +5.60% |
| 2002 | +10.99% | N/A |
| 2001 | +13.92% | N/A |
| 2000 | +69.50% | N/A |
| 1999 | -16.09% | N/A |
MTB vs SHG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MTB was -73.52%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SHG was -82.01%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 4525 trading sessions.
The current MTB drawdown is -10.26%. The current SHG drawdown is -4.43%.
| Rank | MTB | SHG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -73.52% Feb 20, 2007 - Oct 17, 2012 | -82.01% Jul 12, 2007 - Jul 8, 2025 |
| #2 | -52.97% Mar 9, 2018 - Jan 7, 2022 | -35.05% Apr 23, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004 |
| #3 | -40.69% Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 | -23.50% May 8, 2006 - Dec 27, 2006 |
| #4 | -28.19% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 8, 2026 | -19.73% Mar 1, 2005 - Jul 27, 2005 |
| #5 | -26.75% Nov 2, 1999 - Aug 4, 2000 | -18.03% Feb 20, 2026 - Mar 13, 2026 |
| #6 | -23.95% May 17, 2002 - May 30, 2003 | -14.67% Feb 1, 2006 - Mar 31, 2006 |
| #7 | -23.47% Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016 | -14.08% Feb 17, 2004 - Apr 12, 2004 |
| #8 | -19.77% Jul 20, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002 | -14.05% Nov 13, 2003 - Dec 31, 2003 |
| #9 | -18.02% Feb 16, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022 | -13.47% Feb 22, 2007 - Jun 4, 2007 |
| #10 | -16.99% Feb 6, 2026 - Mar 19, 2026 | -12.74% Sep 16, 2003 - Oct 10, 2003 |
| #11 | -16.08% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 1, 2017 | -11.56% Oct 10, 2003 - Nov 13, 2003 |
| #12 | -15.04% Dec 30, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004 | -10.88% Jan 6, 2006 - Feb 1, 2006 |
| #13 | -13.61% Jan 14, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022 | -10.64% Sep 29, 2005 - Nov 14, 2005 |
| #14 | -12.43% Mar 7, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001 | -9.63% Nov 17, 2004 - Dec 27, 2004 |
| #15 | -12.30% Dec 5, 2014 - Mar 20, 2015 | -8.57% Aug 1, 2005 - Sep 7, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between MTB and SHG is 0.58 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MTB vs SHG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MTB | SHG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.71% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 3.24% | 2.24% |
| 2024 | 2.85% | 5.96% |
| 2023 | 3.79% | 3.87% |
| 2022 | 3.31% | 5.54% |
| 2021 | 2.93% | 1.54% |
| 2020 | 3.46% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.42% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 2.48% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.75% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 3.35% |
| 2015 | 2.31% | 3.10% |
| 2014 | 2.23% | 2.14% |
| 2013 | 2.41% | 1.37% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 3.41% |
| 2011 | 3.67% | 1.94% |
| 2010 | 3.22% | 1.47% |
| 2009 | 4.19% | 2.06% |
| 2008 | 4.88% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 3.19% | 1.61% |
| 2006 | 1.84% | 1.86% |
| 2005 | 1.60% | 2.03% |
| 2004 | 1.48% | 3.23% |
| 2003 | 1.22% | 3.27% |
| 2002 | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.92% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.30% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks