MTB vs LVS
Comparison between M & T Bank Corp (MTB, Company) and Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS, Company).
MTB is from the Financial Services sector, while LVS is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceMTB has outperformed LVS, delivering a return of +12.0% compared to -0.7%
MTB vs LVS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MTB vs LVS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MTB vs LVS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MTB | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +15.23% | -21.45% |
| 2025 | +10.48% | +33.24% |
| 2024 | +39.71% | +1.80% |
| 2023 | -1.61% | +0.51% |
| 2022 | -5.85% | +23.73% |
| 2021 | +24.76% | -35.05% |
| 2020 | -22.69% | -14.19% |
| 2019 | +20.18% | +34.00% |
| 2018 | -14.69% | -21.12% |
| 2017 | +11.15% | +36.42% |
| 2016 | +36.28% | +30.05% |
| 2015 | -1.12% | -17.88% |
| 2014 | +11.72% | -24.69% |
| 2013 | +18.22% | +65.48% |
| 2012 | +30.33% | +12.57% |
| 2011 | -10.03% | -6.27% |
| 2010 | +34.50% | +176.47% |
| 2009 | +23.24% | +110.72% |
| 2008 | -25.55% | -94.09% |
| 2007 | -31.82% | +12.01% |
| 2006 | +12.19% | +131.33% |
| 2005 | +4.73% | -18.64% |
| 2004 | +12.23% | +3.09% |
| 2003 | +22.06% | N/A |
| 2002 | +10.99% | N/A |
| 2001 | +13.92% | N/A |
| 2000 | +69.50% | N/A |
| 1999 | -16.09% | N/A |
MTB vs LVS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MTB was -73.52%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for LVS was -99.02%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current MTB drawdown is -1.21%. The current LVS drawdown is -44.45%.
| Rank | MTB | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -73.52% Feb 20, 2007 - Oct 17, 2012 | -99.02% Oct 2, 2007 - Mar 9, 2009 |
| #2 | -52.97% Mar 9, 2018 - Jan 7, 2022 | -43.98% Dec 17, 2004 - Feb 16, 2006 |
| #3 | -40.69% Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 | -32.93% Jan 16, 2007 - Sep 11, 2007 |
| #4 | -28.19% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 8, 2026 | -23.70% Jun 30, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 |
| #5 | -26.75% Nov 2, 1999 - Aug 4, 2000 | -15.73% May 5, 2006 - Jun 29, 2006 |
| #6 | -23.95% May 17, 2002 - May 30, 2003 | -11.76% Mar 6, 2006 - Mar 30, 2006 |
| #7 | -23.47% Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016 | -8.61% Dec 4, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 |
| #8 | -19.77% Jul 20, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002 | -6.20% Apr 17, 2006 - May 4, 2006 |
| #9 | -18.02% Feb 16, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022 | -4.50% Sep 25, 2007 - Oct 2, 2007 |
| #10 | -16.99% Feb 6, 2026 - Mar 19, 2026 | -4.38% Feb 23, 2006 - Mar 6, 2006 |
| #11 | -16.08% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 1, 2017 | -3.20% Nov 14, 2006 - Nov 24, 2006 |
| #12 | -15.04% Dec 30, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004 | -3.03% Mar 30, 2006 - Apr 4, 2006 |
| #13 | -13.61% Jan 14, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022 | -2.82% Sep 18, 2007 - Sep 24, 2007 |
| #14 | -12.43% Mar 7, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001 | -2.60% Nov 27, 2006 - Dec 4, 2006 |
| #15 | -12.30% Dec 5, 2014 - Mar 20, 2015 | -2.49% Apr 7, 2006 - Apr 12, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between MTB and LVS is 0.54 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MTB vs LVS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MTB | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.29% | 1.18% |
| 2025 | 3.24% | 1.54% |
| 2024 | 2.85% | 1.56% |
| 2023 | 3.79% | 0.81% |
| 2022 | 3.31% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 2.93% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 3.46% | 1.33% |
| 2019 | 2.42% | 4.46% |
| 2018 | 2.48% | 5.76% |
| 2017 | 1.75% | 4.20% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 5.39% |
| 2015 | 2.31% | 5.93% |
| 2014 | 2.23% | 3.44% |
| 2013 | 2.41% | 1.78% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 8.12% |
| 2011 | 3.67% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 3.22% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 4.19% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 4.88% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 3.19% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.84% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.60% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.48% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.92% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.30% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks