MOO vs GIGB

Comparison between VANECK AGRIBUSINESS ETF (MOO, ETF) and GOLDMAN SACHS ACCESS INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF (GIGB, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceMOO has outperformed GIGB, delivering a return of +1.2% compared to -0.2%

MOO vs GIGB - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	MOO(ETF)	GIGB(ETF)
Net Assets	$975M	$971M
Expense Ratio	0.56%	0.08%
Max Drawdown	69.53%	26.20%
Sharpe Ratio	0.93	-0.41
5Y Beta	0.50	0.13
P/E Ratio	22.93	N/A
Forward P/E	16.21	N/A
PEG Ratio	0.21	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	18.30%	8.70%
Debt to Equity	57.98%	N/A
P/S Ratio	0.90	N/A
P/B Ratio	2.07	N/A

Net Assets

Winner

MOO

$975M

GIGB

$971M

Expense Ratio

MOO

0.56%

Winner

GIGB

0.08%

Max Drawdown

MOO

69.53%

Winner

GIGB

26.20%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

MOO

0.93

GIGB

-0.41

5Y Beta

MOO

0.50

Winner

GIGB

0.13

P/E Ratio

MOO

22.93

GIGB

N/A

Forward P/E

MOO

16.21

GIGB

N/A

PEG Ratio

MOO

0.21

GIGB

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

MOO

18.30%

GIGB

8.70%

Debt to Equity

MOO

57.98%

GIGB

N/A

P/S Ratio

MOO

0.90

GIGB

N/A

P/B Ratio

MOO

2.07

GIGB

N/A

MOO vs GIGB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	MOO	GIGB
1 month	+3.70%	-0.27%
3 months	+5.88%	-0.38%
6 months	-0.83%	-1.82%
1 year	+17.14%	+2.28%
5 years(CAGR)	+1.24%	-0.24%
10 years(CAGR)	+7.47%	+2.33%
Max(CAGR)	+5.72%	+2.33%

Winner

MOO

+3.70%

GIGB

-0.27%

Winner

MOO

+5.88%

GIGB

-0.38%

Winner

MOO

-0.83%

GIGB

-1.82%

Winner

MOO

+17.14%

GIGB

+2.28%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

MOO

+1.24%

GIGB

-0.24%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

MOO

+7.47%

GIGB

+2.33%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

MOO

+5.72%

GIGB

+2.33%

MOO vs GIGB - Annual Returns (2007 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	MOO	GIGB
2026	+15.62%	-0.35%
2025	+15.58%	+7.46%
2024	-12.50%	+2.27%
2023	-7.83%	+8.15%
2022	-7.72%	-15.06%
2021	+24.09%	-1.24%
2020	+14.10%	+9.59%
2019	+22.54%	+15.00%
2018	-6.98%	-2.38%
2017	+21.38%	+2.44%
2016	+14.26%	N/A
2015	-8.82%	N/A
2014	+0.86%	N/A
2013	+2.62%	N/A
2012	+10.70%	N/A
2011	-11.98%	N/A
2010	+20.29%	N/A
2009	+50.15%	N/A
2008	-50.62%	N/A
2007	+39.44%	N/A

MOO vs GIGB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MOO was -69.53%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2291 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for GIGB was -22.25%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. Recovery took 1104 trading sessions.

The current MOO drawdown is -12.29%. The current GIGB drawdown is -1.96%.

Rank	MOO	GIGB
#1	-69.53% Jun 17, 2008 - Jul 24, 2017	-22.25% Sep 22, 2021 - Feb 17, 2026
#2	-39.51% Apr 20, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025	-19.64% Mar 6, 2020 - Jun 10, 2020
#3	-36.75% Jan 13, 2020 - Sep 2, 2020	-5.78% Dec 31, 2020 - Aug 4, 2021
#4	-17.82% Jan 14, 2008 - Apr 15, 2008	-4.30% Dec 29, 2017 - Jan 31, 2019
#5	-16.95% Oct 3, 2018 - Jun 19, 2019	-2.98% Aug 6, 2020 - Dec 30, 2020
#6	-11.26% Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 5, 2007	-2.87% Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 27, 2026
#7	-9.92% Apr 21, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008	-2.55% Aug 28, 2019 - Oct 4, 2019
#8	-9.28% Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 20, 2018	-1.57% Aug 4, 2021 - Sep 22, 2021
#9	-7.05% Nov 5, 2021 - Jan 12, 2022	-1.40% Oct 4, 2019 - Nov 26, 2019
#10	-6.41% May 7, 2021 - Oct 19, 2021	-1.23% Jul 3, 2019 - Aug 1, 2019
#11	-6.07% Jul 23, 2019 - Nov 4, 2019	-1.02% Jun 10, 2020 - Jun 15, 2020
#12	-5.70% Dec 10, 2007 - Dec 21, 2007	-0.99% Sep 7, 2017 - Nov 22, 2017
#13	-5.54% Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020	-0.92% Jun 26, 2017 - Jul 18, 2017
#14	-5.48% Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021	-0.70% Dec 15, 2017 - Dec 29, 2017
#15	-5.31% Jan 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2022	-0.65% Aug 3, 2017 - Aug 31, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between MOO and GIGB is 0.48 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.48

-101

Dividend Comparison (2008 - 2026)

MOO vs GIGB dividend yield comparison.

Year	MOO	GIGB
2026	0.00%	2.71%
2025	2.47%	4.69%
2024	3.41%	4.45%
2023	2.93%	3.67%
2022	2.15%	3.12%
2021	1.17%	2.25%
2020	1.10%	2.62%
2019	1.26%	3.22%
2018	1.69%	3.31%
2017	1.44%	1.55%
2016	2.14%	0.00%
2015	2.89%	0.00%
2014	3.21%	0.00%
2013	1.91%	0.00%
2012	1.84%	0.00%
2011	0.64%	0.00%
2010	0.61%	0.00%
2009	0.96%	0.00%
2008	1.01%	0.00%