MOO vs AWF

Comparison between VANECK AGRIBUSINESS ETF (MOO, ETF) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund Inc (AWF, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceAWF has outperformed MOO, delivering a return of +3.9% compared to +0.7%

MOO vs AWF - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	MOO(ETF)	AWF(ETF)
Net Assets	$975M	$971M
Expense Ratio	0.56%	N/A
Max Drawdown	69.53%	58.11%
Sharpe Ratio	0.78	-0.60
5Y Beta	0.50	0.35
P/E Ratio	22.93	N/A
Forward P/E	16.78	N/A
PEG Ratio	0.21	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	18.30%	0.00%
Debt to Equity	57.98%	N/A
P/S Ratio	0.90	N/A
P/B Ratio	2.07	N/A

Net Assets

Winner

MOO

$975M

AWF

$971M

Expense Ratio

MOO

0.56%

AWF

N/A

Max Drawdown

MOO

69.53%

Winner

AWF

58.11%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

MOO

0.78

AWF

-0.60

5Y Beta

MOO

0.50

Winner

AWF

0.35

P/E Ratio

MOO

22.93

AWF

N/A

Forward P/E

MOO

16.78

AWF

N/A

PEG Ratio

MOO

0.21

AWF

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

MOO

18.30%

AWF

0.00%

Debt to Equity

MOO

57.98%

AWF

N/A

P/S Ratio

MOO

0.90

AWF

N/A

P/B Ratio

MOO

2.07

AWF

N/A

MOO vs AWF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	MOO	AWF
1 month	+2.16%	+1.85%
3 months	+5.96%	+0.96%
6 months	-0.06%	+0.57%
1 year	+15.29%	-2.41%
5 years(CAGR)	+0.71%	+3.90%
10 years(CAGR)	+7.45%	+5.17%
Max(CAGR)	+5.70%	+9.92%

Winner

MOO

+2.16%

AWF

+1.85%

Winner

MOO

+5.96%

AWF

+0.96%

MOO

-0.06%

Winner

AWF

+0.57%

Winner

MOO

+15.29%

AWF

-2.41%

5Y(CAGR)

MOO

+0.71%

Winner

AWF

+3.90%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

MOO

+7.45%

AWF

+5.17%

Max(CAGR)

MOO

+5.70%

Winner

AWF

+9.92%

MOO vs AWF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	MOO	AWF
2026	+15.30%	-0.17%
2025	+15.58%	+7.09%
2024	-12.50%	+13.51%
2023	-7.83%	+16.57%
2022	-7.72%	-16.82%
2021	+24.09%	+9.58%
2020	+14.10%	+4.70%
2019	+22.54%	+20.19%
2018	-6.98%	-11.22%
2017	+21.38%	+6.58%
2016	+14.26%	+23.68%
2015	-8.82%	-4.85%
2014	+0.86%	-3.55%
2013	+2.62%	-0.91%
2012	+10.70%	+18.15%
2011	-11.98%	+10.23%
2010	+20.29%	+16.72%
2009	+50.15%	+87.04%
2008	-50.62%	-30.41%
2007	+39.44%	+5.03%
2006	N/A	+20.10%
2005	N/A	+8.30%
2004	N/A	+3.32%
2003	N/A	+45.46%
2002	N/A	+12.40%
2001	N/A	+26.10%
2000	N/A	+6.73%
1999	N/A	-6.33%

MOO vs AWF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MOO was -69.53%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2291 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for AWF was -55.54%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 293 trading sessions.

The current MOO drawdown is -12.53%. The current AWF drawdown is -4.42%.

Rank	MOO	AWF
#1	-69.53% Jun 17, 2008 - Jul 24, 2017	-55.54% Jun 4, 2008 - Aug 3, 2009
#2	-39.51% Apr 20, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025	-40.12% Feb 20, 2020 - Dec 30, 2020
#3	-36.75% Jan 13, 2020 - Sep 2, 2020	-25.23% Nov 12, 2021 - Mar 1, 2024
#4	-17.82% Jan 14, 2008 - Apr 15, 2008	-24.59% Jan 23, 2004 - Jan 3, 2005
#5	-16.95% Oct 3, 2018 - Jun 19, 2019	-21.15% May 16, 2013 - Jun 8, 2016
#6	-11.26% Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 5, 2007	-18.61% May 31, 2002 - Dec 30, 2002
#7	-9.92% Apr 21, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008	-18.10% Jun 4, 2007 - Jan 11, 2008
#8	-9.28% Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 20, 2018	-17.55% Jun 29, 2001 - Jan 8, 2002
#9	-7.05% Nov 5, 2021 - Jan 12, 2022	-16.68% Apr 26, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010
#10	-6.41% May 7, 2021 - Oct 19, 2021	-15.69% Jul 8, 2011 - Dec 22, 2011
#11	-6.07% Jul 23, 2019 - Nov 4, 2019	-15.48% Oct 20, 2017 - Apr 11, 2019
#12	-5.70% Dec 10, 2007 - Dec 21, 2007	-13.63% Jul 17, 2000 - Jan 17, 2001
#13	-5.54% Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020	-13.05% Jun 17, 2003 - Sep 30, 2003
#14	-5.48% Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021	-11.49% Nov 8, 2010 - Apr 1, 2011
#15	-5.31% Jan 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2022	-11.11% Feb 26, 2025 - Jun 18, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between MOO and AWF is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.87

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

MOO vs AWF dividend yield comparison.

Year	MOO	AWF
2026	0.00%	4.67%
2025	2.47%	7.81%
2024	3.41%	7.47%
2023	2.93%	7.33%
2022	2.15%	10.30%
2021	1.17%	6.48%
2020	1.10%	6.68%
2019	1.26%	6.62%
2018	1.69%	7.97%
2017	1.44%	6.03%
2016	2.14%	7.73%
2015	2.89%	10.28%
2014	3.21%	11.91%
2013	1.91%	11.09%
2012	1.84%	9.21%
2011	0.64%	11.45%
2010	0.61%	8.39%
2009	0.96%	8.41%
2008	1.01%	18.70%
2007	0.00%	13.20%
2006	0.00%	8.09%
2005	0.00%	7.57%
2004	0.00%	7.52%
2003	0.00%	8.08%
2002	0.00%	12.22%
2001	0.00%	14.01%
2000	0.00%	5.12%