MLP vs TWIN
Comparison between Maui Land & Pineapple Co. Inc (MLP, Company) and Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN, Company).
MLP is from the Real Estate sector, while TWIN is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceTWIN has outperformed MLP, delivering a return of +10.8% compared to +10.0%
MLP vs TWIN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MLP vs TWIN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MLP vs TWIN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MLP | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.35% | +44.19% |
| 2025 | -21.25% | +46.27% |
| 2024 | +33.78% | -25.35% |
| 2023 | +67.26% | +80.06% |
| 2022 | -7.28% | -12.27% |
| 2021 | -11.07% | +43.27% |
| 2020 | +5.59% | -29.72% |
| 2019 | +14.10% | -28.90% |
| 2018 | -43.31% | -43.85% |
| 2017 | +147.14% | +72.64% |
| 2016 | +35.59% | +40.25% |
| 2015 | -10.34% | -43.91% |
| 2014 | -3.51% | -21.76% |
| 2013 | +46.75% | +37.18% |
| 2012 | +2.22% | -50.42% |
| 2011 | -16.77% | +24.93% |
| 2010 | -8.62% | +174.74% |
| 2009 | -57.67% | +42.27% |
| 2008 | -53.37% | -79.21% |
| 2007 | -11.87% | +104.52% |
| 2006 | +0.15% | +53.54% |
| 2005 | -14.21% | +83.27% |
| 2004 | +14.26% | +38.67% |
| 2003 | +122.38% | +57.65% |
| 2002 | -34.52% | -10.29% |
| 2001 | +1.68% | +3.12% |
| 2000 | +37.01% | +26.30% |
| 1999 | -13.92% | -13.30% |
MLP vs TWIN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MLP was -95.97%, occurring on Oct 17, 2012. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TWIN was -89.97%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1000 trading sessions.
The current MLP drawdown is -63.33%. The current TWIN drawdown is -42.13%.
| Rank | MLP | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -95.97% Feb 25, 2005 - Oct 17, 2012 | -89.97% Jul 12, 2007 - Jun 29, 2011 |
| #2 | -47.84% Jun 28, 2001 - Oct 1, 2003 | -88.60% Nov 16, 2011 - Sep 24, 2020 |
| #3 | -35.70% Oct 2, 2000 - Jun 25, 2001 | -42.97% Aug 3, 2011 - Nov 3, 2011 |
| #4 | -28.84% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 14, 2000 | -35.85% Apr 22, 2002 - Jul 31, 2003 |
| #5 | -25.85% Feb 19, 2004 - Dec 20, 2004 | -28.30% Feb 4, 2005 - Aug 4, 2005 |
| #6 | -12.53% Dec 21, 2004 - Feb 4, 2005 | -27.22% Jun 8, 2001 - Apr 1, 2002 |
| #7 | -12.33% Apr 20, 2000 - Jun 23, 2000 | -25.87% Aug 10, 2000 - Jun 8, 2001 |
| #8 | -10.28% Jan 27, 2004 - Feb 18, 2004 | -23.13% Nov 23, 1999 - Jan 26, 2000 |
| #9 | -7.24% Dec 16, 2003 - Jan 8, 2004 | -20.88% May 8, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 |
| #10 | -4.30% Oct 1, 2003 - Oct 9, 2003 | -15.89% Feb 22, 2007 - Apr 18, 2007 |
| #11 | -3.91% Oct 13, 2003 - Nov 12, 2003 | -15.68% Jan 27, 2006 - Apr 19, 2006 |
| #12 | -3.39% Nov 14, 2003 - Nov 18, 2003 | -15.68% Aug 2, 2006 - Jan 23, 2007 |
| #13 | -3.24% Jun 26, 2000 - Aug 29, 2000 | -14.56% Feb 18, 2000 - Aug 9, 2000 |
| #14 | -3.10% Jan 13, 2004 - Jan 21, 2004 | -14.26% Oct 4, 2005 - Nov 18, 2005 |
| #15 | -2.84% Feb 7, 2005 - Feb 17, 2005 | -14.24% Aug 2, 2004 - Jan 25, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between MLP and TWIN is -0.35 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MLP vs TWIN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MLP | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.34% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 0.96% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 1.36% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 3.42% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.81% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.39% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 2.07% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 0.88% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.68% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 4.06% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.66% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.57% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.74% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 3.68% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 5.66% |
| 2001 | 0.52% | 5.01% |
| 2000 | 0.53% | 4.87% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.47% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks