MFEM vs CIK
Comparison between PIMCO RAFI DYNAMIC MULTI-FACTOR EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF (MFEM, ETF) and Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund Inc (CIK, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceMFEM has outperformed CIK, delivering a return of +7.6% compared to +2.6%
MFEM vs CIK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MFEM vs CIK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MFEM vs CIK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MFEM | CIK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +17.17% | -8.58% |
| 2025 | +25.82% | +7.14% |
| 2024 | +6.16% | +5.40% |
| 2023 | +14.55% | +35.36% |
| 2022 | -20.63% | -20.82% |
| 2021 | +10.12% | +19.34% |
| 2020 | +9.82% | +6.85% |
| 2019 | +14.99% | +25.89% |
| 2018 | -15.89% | -8.39% |
| 2017 | +4.82% | +13.04% |
| 2016 | N/A | +23.48% |
| 2015 | N/A | -7.33% |
| 2014 | N/A | -0.10% |
| 2013 | N/A | -6.22% |
| 2012 | N/A | +19.19% |
| 2011 | N/A | +12.25% |
| 2010 | N/A | +15.26% |
| 2009 | N/A | +58.36% |
| 2008 | N/A | -24.93% |
| 2007 | N/A | -10.40% |
| 2006 | N/A | +27.13% |
| 2005 | N/A | -9.37% |
| 2004 | N/A | +7.88% |
| 2003 | N/A | +26.34% |
| 2002 | N/A | -14.24% |
| 2001 | N/A | +0.33% |
| 2000 | N/A | -3.89% |
| 1999 | N/A | -3.96% |
MFEM vs CIK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MFEM was -43.32%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 735 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CIK was -54.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.
The current MFEM drawdown is -10.46%. The current CIK drawdown is -12.39%.
| Rank | MFEM | CIK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -43.32% Jan 26, 2018 - Dec 28, 2020 | -54.28% May 16, 2007 - Dec 21, 2009 |
| #2 | -31.39% Jun 4, 2021 - Sep 26, 2024 | -39.09% Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020 |
| #3 | -19.22% Oct 7, 2024 - Jun 24, 2025 | -36.18% Jan 15, 2002 - May 31, 2005 |
| #4 | -12.86% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026 | -26.94% Jan 29, 2001 - Jan 15, 2002 |
| #5 | -12.71% Jun 2, 2026 - Jul 20, 2026 | -26.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 26, 2023 |
| #6 | -7.46% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 27, 2021 | -24.22% May 3, 2013 - Dec 12, 2016 |
| #7 | -6.04% Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021 | -21.26% Jul 13, 2005 - Sep 28, 2006 |
| #8 | -6.02% May 11, 2026 - May 26, 2026 | -20.19% Aug 18, 2000 - Jan 26, 2001 |
| #9 | -4.76% May 7, 2021 - May 28, 2021 | -17.34% May 27, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012 |
| #10 | -4.46% Sep 17, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025 | -15.65% Jul 25, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023 |
| #11 | -4.16% Nov 12, 2025 - Dec 26, 2025 | -15.49% Oct 7, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026 |
| #12 | -3.96% Sep 11, 2017 - Oct 16, 2017 | -15.16% Oct 3, 2018 - Mar 20, 2019 |
| #13 | -3.68% Nov 24, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017 | -14.29% May 3, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010 |
| #14 | -3.64% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 12, 2025 | -12.39% Feb 2, 2000 - Jul 17, 2000 |
| #15 | -3.51% Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026 | -11.87% Nov 2, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between MFEM and CIK is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
MFEM vs CIK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MFEM | CIK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.25% | 5.89% |
| 2025 | 2.77% | 9.54% |
| 2024 | 5.89% | 9.34% |
| 2023 | 4.01% | 8.63% |
| 2022 | 7.01% | 10.71% |
| 2021 | 29.96% | 7.87% |
| 2020 | 1.70% | 8.57% |
| 2019 | 2.37% | 8.39% |
| 2018 | 1.18% | 9.64% |
| 2017 | 0.21% | 7.98% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 8.35% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 9.50% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 8.39% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 8.34% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 7.89% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 7.99% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 9.82% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 9.40% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 18.80% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 9.22% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 9.13% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 10.76% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 9.44% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 10.00% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 18.04% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 14.46% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 5.45% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks