StockComparison Logo
vs

LYB vs SQM

Comparison between LyondellBasell Industries NV - Class A (LYB, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).

Both LYB and SQM are from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed LYB, delivering a return of +15.2% compared to -0.6%

LYB vs SQM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
LYB
$20B
Winner
SQM
$20B
Max Drawdown
Winner
LYB
71.27%
SQM
80.45%
Sharpe Ratio
LYB
0.76
Winner
SQM
1.46
5Y Beta
Winner
LYB
0.69
SQM
0.95
Industry
LYB
Specialty Chemicals
SQM
Specialty Chemicals
P/E Ratio
Winner
LYB
-58.03
SQM
24.88
Forward P/E
Winner
LYB
8.72
SQM
11.07
PEG Ratio
LYB
1.53
Winner
SQM
0.70
Dividend Yield
Winner
LYB
6.24%
SQM
1.31%
5Y Dividends CAGR
LYB
5.50%
Winner
SQM
15.24%
5Y EPS CAGR
LYB
N/A
SQM
32.32%
Debt to Equity
Winner
LYB
2.19%
SQM
88.99%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
LYB
7.78%
SQM
5.31%
P/S Ratio
Winner
LYB
0.66
SQM
4.01
P/B Ratio
Winner
LYB
1.90
SQM
3.56

LYB vs SQM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
LYB
+10.36%
Winner
SQM
+19.06%
3M
LYB
-2.65%
Winner
SQM
+3.37%
6M
Winner
LYB
+21.82%
SQM
+15.34%
1Y
LYB
+31.09%
Winner
SQM
+83.50%
5Y(CAGR)
LYB
-0.59%
Winner
SQM
+15.19%
10Y(CAGR)
LYB
+5.85%
Winner
SQM
+17.01%
Max(CAGR)
LYB
+14.51%
Winner
SQM
+17.92%

LYB vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearLYBSQM
2026+55.52%+18.86%
2025-34.63%+91.19%
2024-18.65%-38.56%
2023+19.30%-15.40%
2022-1.84%+70.49%
2021+7.81%+2.60%
2020+3.25%+87.42%
2019+39.13%-27.79%
2018-23.00%-35.04%
2017+32.01%+113.53%
2016+2.56%+61.04%
2015+12.25%-20.43%
2014+3.67%-1.99%
2013+39.64%-54.46%
2012+86.98%+7.62%
2011+9.90%-7.72%
2010+56.36%+53.00%
2009N/A+51.16%
2008N/A+46.55%
2007N/A+33.91%
2006N/A+23.39%
2005N/A+82.30%
2004N/A+52.01%
2003N/A+94.94%
2002N/A-8.87%
2001N/A+19.25%
2000N/A-10.37%
1999N/A+9.77%

LYB vs SQM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LYB was -63.26%, occurring on Mar 16, 2020. Recovery took 289 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.

The current LYB drawdown is -25.14%. The current SQM drawdown is -16.53%.

RankLYBSQM
#1-63.26%
Nov 7, 2019 - Dec 31, 2020
-78.36%
Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017
#2-55.33%
Apr 3, 2024 - Nov 6, 2025
-73.00%
Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021
#3-46.74%
May 2, 2011 - Jan 17, 2012
-72.14%
Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
#4-37.90%
Sep 5, 2014 - Oct 30, 2017
-69.81%
Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025
#5-34.83%
Jun 7, 2022 - Mar 27, 2024
-35.54%
Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002
#6-34.78%
Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 27, 2010
-31.32%
Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006
#7-32.83%
Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 4, 2019
-30.96%
Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021
#8-25.84%
Jun 3, 2021 - May 4, 2022
-29.41%
Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
#9-18.77%
Feb 13, 2012 - Aug 3, 2012
-27.46%
Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004
#10-15.15%
Mar 20, 2013 - May 16, 2013
-26.31%
May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
#11-13.56%
Jan 12, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021
-26.31%
Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008
#12-12.88%
Oct 17, 2012 - Dec 7, 2012
-24.67%
May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003
#13-9.75%
Jan 31, 2013 - Mar 8, 2013
-19.95%
Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
#14-8.96%
May 4, 2022 - May 27, 2022
-19.89%
Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022
#15-8.47%
Jan 15, 2014 - Feb 13, 2014
-19.15%
Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between LYB and SQM is 0.52 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.52
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

LYB vs SQM dividend yield comparison.

YearLYBSQM
20262.04%1.26%
202512.59%0.18%
20247.10%0.59%
20235.20%8.34%
202211.92%9.66%
20214.81%3.92%
20204.58%1.64%
201920.27%4.55%
20184.81%5.37%
20173.22%2.73%
20163.88%4.77%
20153.50%2.00%
20143.40%4.71%
20132.49%3.21%
20127.36%1.69%
201115.54%1.40%
20100.00%0.87%
20090.00%2.70%
20080.00%3.71%
20070.00%2.01%
20060.00%1.76%
20050.00%1.49%
20040.00%1.21%
20030.00%1.20%
20020.00%1.88%
20010.00%2.16%
20000.00%42.10%

Select Stocks to Compare