LVS vs MTB
Comparison between Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS, Company) and M & T Bank Corp (MTB, Company).
LVS is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while MTB is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceMTB has outperformed LVS, delivering a return of +12.0% compared to -0.7%
LVS vs MTB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LVS vs MTB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LVS vs MTB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LVS | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -21.45% | +15.23% |
| 2025 | +33.24% | +10.48% |
| 2024 | +1.80% | +39.71% |
| 2023 | +0.51% | -1.61% |
| 2022 | +23.73% | -5.85% |
| 2021 | -35.05% | +24.76% |
| 2020 | -14.19% | -22.69% |
| 2019 | +34.00% | +20.18% |
| 2018 | -21.12% | -14.69% |
| 2017 | +36.42% | +11.15% |
| 2016 | +30.05% | +36.28% |
| 2015 | -17.88% | -1.12% |
| 2014 | -24.69% | +11.72% |
| 2013 | +65.48% | +18.22% |
| 2012 | +12.57% | +30.33% |
| 2011 | -6.27% | -10.03% |
| 2010 | +176.47% | +34.50% |
| 2009 | +110.72% | +23.24% |
| 2008 | -94.09% | -25.55% |
| 2007 | +12.01% | -31.82% |
| 2006 | +131.33% | +12.19% |
| 2005 | -18.64% | +4.73% |
| 2004 | +3.09% | +12.23% |
| 2003 | N/A | +22.06% |
| 2002 | N/A | +10.99% |
| 2001 | N/A | +13.92% |
| 2000 | N/A | +69.50% |
| 1999 | N/A | -16.09% |
LVS vs MTB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LVS was -99.02%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for MTB was -73.52%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.
The current LVS drawdown is -44.45%. The current MTB drawdown is -1.21%.
| Rank | LVS | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -99.02% Oct 2, 2007 - Mar 9, 2009 | -73.52% Feb 20, 2007 - Oct 17, 2012 |
| #2 | -43.98% Dec 17, 2004 - Feb 16, 2006 | -52.97% Mar 9, 2018 - Jan 7, 2022 |
| #3 | -32.93% Jan 16, 2007 - Sep 11, 2007 | -40.69% Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 |
| #4 | -23.70% Jun 30, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 | -28.19% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 8, 2026 |
| #5 | -15.73% May 5, 2006 - Jun 29, 2006 | -26.75% Nov 2, 1999 - Aug 4, 2000 |
| #6 | -11.76% Mar 6, 2006 - Mar 30, 2006 | -23.95% May 17, 2002 - May 30, 2003 |
| #7 | -8.61% Dec 4, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 | -23.47% Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016 |
| #8 | -6.20% Apr 17, 2006 - May 4, 2006 | -19.77% Jul 20, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002 |
| #9 | -4.50% Sep 25, 2007 - Oct 2, 2007 | -18.02% Feb 16, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022 |
| #10 | -4.38% Feb 23, 2006 - Mar 6, 2006 | -16.99% Feb 6, 2026 - Mar 19, 2026 |
| #11 | -3.20% Nov 14, 2006 - Nov 24, 2006 | -16.08% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 1, 2017 |
| #12 | -3.03% Mar 30, 2006 - Apr 4, 2006 | -15.04% Dec 30, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004 |
| #13 | -2.82% Sep 18, 2007 - Sep 24, 2007 | -13.61% Jan 14, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022 |
| #14 | -2.60% Nov 27, 2006 - Dec 4, 2006 | -12.43% Mar 7, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001 |
| #15 | -2.49% Apr 7, 2006 - Apr 12, 2006 | -12.30% Dec 5, 2014 - Mar 20, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between LVS and MTB is 0.54 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
LVS vs MTB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LVS | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.18% | 1.29% |
| 2025 | 1.54% | 3.24% |
| 2024 | 1.56% | 2.85% |
| 2023 | 0.81% | 3.79% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 3.31% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.93% |
| 2020 | 1.33% | 3.46% |
| 2019 | 4.46% | 2.42% |
| 2018 | 5.76% | 2.48% |
| 2017 | 4.20% | 1.75% |
| 2016 | 5.39% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 5.93% | 2.31% |
| 2014 | 3.44% | 2.23% |
| 2013 | 1.78% | 2.41% |
| 2012 | 8.12% | 2.84% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.67% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.22% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 4.19% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 4.88% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 3.19% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.84% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.60% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.48% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.22% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.32% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.30% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks