LULU vs TRMB

Comparison between Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU, Company) and Trimble Inc (TRMB, Company).

LULU is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while TRMB is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceTRMB has outperformed LULU, delivering a return of -5.2% compared to -16.9%

LULU vs TRMB - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	LULU(COMPANY)	TRMB(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$15B	$15B
Max Drawdown	92.26%	87.23%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.36	-0.30
5Y Beta	1.17	1.32
Industry	Apparel Retail	Scientific & Technical Instruments
P/E Ratio	9.44	32.79
Forward P/E	10.39	17.76
PEG Ratio	0.62	3.84
5Y EPS CAGR	24.33%	1.84%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	25.06%
Free Cash Flow Yield	6.27%	3.27%
P/S Ratio	1.40	4.16
P/B Ratio	3.03	2.73

Market Cap

Winner

LULU

$15B

TRMB

$15B

Max Drawdown

LULU

92.26%

Winner

TRMB

87.23%

Sharpe Ratio

LULU

-1.36

Winner

TRMB

-0.30

5Y Beta

Winner

LULU

1.17

TRMB

1.32

Industry

LULU

Apparel Retail

TRMB

Scientific & Technical Instruments

P/E Ratio

Winner

LULU

9.44

TRMB

32.79

Forward P/E

Winner

LULU

10.39

TRMB

17.76

PEG Ratio

Winner

LULU

0.62

TRMB

3.84

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

LULU

24.33%

TRMB

1.84%

Debt to Equity

Winner

LULU

0.00%

TRMB

25.06%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

LULU

6.27%

TRMB

3.27%

P/S Ratio

Winner

LULU

1.40

TRMB

4.16

P/B Ratio

LULU

3.03

Winner

TRMB

2.73

LULU vs TRMB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	LULU	TRMB
1 month	-17.42%	-8.90%
3 months	-25.33%	-9.16%
6 months	-21.04%	-22.94%
1 year	-53.55%	-9.77%
5 years(CAGR)	-16.85%	-5.18%
10 years(CAGR)	+7.44%	+10.13%
Max(CAGR)	+12.65%	+12.35%

LULU

-17.42%

Winner

TRMB

-8.90%

LULU

-25.33%

Winner

TRMB

-9.16%

Winner

LULU

-21.04%

TRMB

-22.94%

LULU

-53.55%

Winner

TRMB

-9.77%

5Y(CAGR)

LULU

-16.85%

Winner

TRMB

-5.18%

10Y(CAGR)

LULU

+7.44%

Winner

TRMB

+10.13%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

LULU

+12.65%

TRMB

+12.35%

LULU vs TRMB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	LULU	TRMB
2026	-37.77%	-22.38%
2025	-44.18%	+12.39%
2024	-24.33%	+34.72%
2023	+58.11%	+5.14%
2022	-17.33%	-41.67%
2021	+9.83%	+31.53%
2020	+49.10%	+59.20%
2019	+87.82%	+28.40%
2018	+52.60%	-19.85%
2017	+17.56%	+34.26%
2016	+16.34%	+39.65%
2015	-5.19%	-20.29%
2014	-4.78%	-22.94%
2013	-20.25%	+12.81%
2012	+62.09%	+43.60%
2011	+30.37%	+6.79%
2010	+121.35%	+55.67%
2009	+286.39%	+13.00%
2008	-82.31%	-27.21%
2007	+69.18%	+17.28%
2006	N/A	+40.68%
2005	N/A	+9.77%
2004	N/A	+34.97%
2003	N/A	+184.49%
2002	N/A	-22.85%
2001	N/A	-29.52%
2000	N/A	-3.54%
1999	N/A	+30.06%

LULU vs TRMB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LULU was -92.26%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 790 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for TRMB was -87.23%, occurring on Oct 7, 2002. Recovery took 1256 trading sessions.

The current LULU drawdown is -74.34%. The current TRMB drawdown is -36.48%.

Rank	LULU	TRMB
#1	-92.26% Oct 22, 2007 - Dec 9, 2010	-87.23% Jul 18, 2000 - Jul 19, 2005
#2	-74.77% Dec 29, 2023 - May 4, 2026	-71.92% Oct 23, 2007 - Jan 14, 2011
#3	-54.73% Jun 10, 2013 - Feb 26, 2018	-59.66% Mar 6, 2014 - Sep 19, 2017
#4	-47.29% Feb 20, 2020 - May 21, 2020	-57.35% Aug 30, 2021 - Nov 13, 2023
#5	-46.12% Nov 16, 2021 - Dec 8, 2023	-53.78% Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 6, 2020
#6	-33.56% May 3, 2012 - May 10, 2013	-39.04% Mar 7, 2000 - May 1, 2000
#7	-31.60% Jul 20, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012	-37.49% Apr 4, 2011 - Mar 13, 2012
#8	-30.30% Sep 28, 2018 - Mar 28, 2019	-35.88% Jul 20, 2005 - Mar 22, 2006
#9	-28.41% Sep 2, 2020 - Jul 23, 2021	-33.10% Jan 23, 2018 - Jun 28, 2019
#10	-18.67% Apr 21, 2011 - Jun 21, 2011	-27.42% Mar 27, 2012 - Nov 29, 2012
#11	-15.15% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007	-23.63% Jan 3, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000
#12	-12.58% Feb 11, 2011 - Mar 28, 2011	-21.81% Jan 25, 2013 - Nov 1, 2013
#13	-11.93% Oct 10, 2007 - Oct 16, 2007	-21.27% Jul 3, 2019 - Feb 19, 2020
#14	-11.10% Sep 24, 2021 - Oct 26, 2021	-18.88% May 5, 2006 - Aug 3, 2006
#15	-10.57% Jun 3, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020	-15.55% Dec 28, 1999 - Jan 3, 2000