LULU vs ONTO

Comparison between Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU, Company) and Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO, Company).

LULU is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while ONTO is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceONTO has outperformed LULU, delivering a return of +33.8% compared to -16.9%

LULU vs ONTO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	LULU(COMPANY)	ONTO(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$15B	$15B
Max Drawdown	92.26%	98.56%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.36	1.59
5Y Beta	1.17	2.38
Industry	Apparel Retail	Semiconductor Equipment & Materials
P/E Ratio	9.44	136.05
Forward P/E	10.39	42.37
PEG Ratio	0.62	1.44
5Y EPS CAGR	24.33%	25.30%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	6.27%	1.63%
P/S Ratio	1.40	14.55
P/B Ratio	3.03	7.09

Market Cap

Winner

LULU

$15B

ONTO

$15B

Max Drawdown

Winner

LULU

92.26%

ONTO

98.56%

Sharpe Ratio

LULU

-1.36

Winner

ONTO

1.59

5Y Beta

Winner

LULU

1.17

ONTO

2.38

Industry

LULU

Apparel Retail

ONTO

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials

P/E Ratio

Winner

LULU

9.44

ONTO

136.05

Forward P/E

Winner

LULU

10.39

ONTO

42.37

PEG Ratio

Winner

LULU

0.62

ONTO

1.44

5Y EPS CAGR

LULU

24.33%

Winner

ONTO

25.30%

Debt to Equity

LULU

0.00%

ONTO

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

LULU

6.27%

ONTO

1.63%

P/S Ratio

Winner

LULU

1.40

ONTO

14.55

P/B Ratio

Winner

LULU

3.03

ONTO

7.09

LULU vs ONTO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	LULU	ONTO
1 month	-17.42%	+18.46%
3 months	-25.33%	+33.07%
6 months	-21.04%	+104.82%
1 year	-53.55%	+124.65%
5 years(CAGR)	-16.85%	+33.79%
10 years(CAGR)	+7.44%	+31.90%
Max(CAGR)	+12.65%	+12.75%

LULU

-17.42%

Winner

ONTO

+18.46%

LULU

-25.33%

Winner

ONTO

+33.07%

LULU

-21.04%

Winner

ONTO

+104.82%

LULU

-53.55%

Winner

ONTO

+124.65%

5Y(CAGR)

LULU

-16.85%

Winner

ONTO

+33.79%

10Y(CAGR)

LULU

+7.44%

Winner

ONTO

+31.90%

Max(CAGR)

LULU

+12.65%

Winner

ONTO

+12.75%

LULU vs ONTO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	LULU	ONTO
2026	-37.77%	+71.75%
2025	-44.18%	-7.91%
2024	-24.33%	+15.28%
2023	+58.11%	+124.39%
2022	-17.33%	-34.28%
2021	+9.83%	+111.91%
2020	+49.10%	+28.41%
2019	+87.82%	+32.82%
2018	+52.60%	+8.24%
2017	+17.56%	-0.12%
2016	+16.34%	+70.59%
2015	-5.19%	-7.34%
2014	-4.78%	-7.43%
2013	-20.25%	+25.08%
2012	+62.09%	-19.62%
2011	+30.37%	+44.13%
2010	+121.35%	+14.86%
2009	+286.39%	+828.69%
2008	-82.31%	-88.52%
2007	+69.18%	+18.94%
2006	N/A	-29.37%
2005	N/A	-27.30%
2004	N/A	+7.46%
2003	N/A	+265.92%
2002	N/A	-78.50%
2001	N/A	+39.77%
2000	N/A	-30.08%
1999	N/A	+70.45%

LULU vs ONTO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LULU was -92.26%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 790 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ONTO was -98.56%, occurring on Dec 4, 2008. Recovery took 5134 trading sessions.

The current LULU drawdown is -74.34%. The current ONTO drawdown is -7.46%.

Rank	LULU	ONTO
#1	-92.26% Oct 22, 2007 - Dec 9, 2010	-98.56% Sep 5, 2000 - Feb 2, 2021
#2	-74.77% Dec 29, 2023 - May 4, 2026	-62.82% Jul 16, 2024 - Apr 8, 2026
#3	-54.73% Jun 10, 2013 - Feb 26, 2018	-58.57% Feb 22, 2000 - Sep 1, 2000
#4	-47.29% Feb 20, 2020 - May 21, 2020	-44.28% Jan 14, 2022 - May 26, 2023
#5	-46.12% Nov 16, 2021 - Dec 8, 2023	-30.90% Dec 9, 1999 - Jan 24, 2000
#6	-33.56% May 3, 2012 - May 10, 2013	-22.29% Oct 12, 2023 - Dec 11, 2023
#7	-31.60% Jul 20, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012	-20.65% Apr 5, 2021 - May 28, 2021
#8	-30.30% Sep 28, 2018 - Mar 28, 2019	-16.07% Jan 25, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
#9	-28.41% Sep 2, 2020 - Jul 23, 2021	-15.95% Feb 19, 2021 - Mar 17, 2021
#10	-18.67% Apr 21, 2011 - Jun 21, 2011	-15.77% Aug 9, 2021 - Sep 7, 2021
#11	-15.15% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007	-15.06% Jun 11, 2021 - Aug 6, 2021
#12	-12.58% Feb 11, 2011 - Mar 28, 2011	-13.84% Mar 7, 2024 - May 3, 2024
#13	-11.93% Oct 10, 2007 - Oct 16, 2007	-13.09% Dec 14, 2023 - Jan 19, 2024
#14	-11.10% Sep 24, 2021 - Oct 26, 2021	-12.14% Aug 31, 2023 - Oct 10, 2023
#15	-10.57% Jun 3, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020	-11.78% Sep 14, 2021 - Nov 1, 2021