StockComparison Logo
vs

LNG vs FITB

Comparison between Cheniere Energy Inc (LNG, Company) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB, Company).

LNG is from the Energy sector, while FITB is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceLNG has outperformed FITB, delivering a return of +23.4% compared to +11.5%

LNG vs FITB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
LNG
$48B
FITB
$48B
Max Drawdown
Winner
LNG
97.84%
FITB
98.52%
Sharpe Ratio
LNG
-0.11
Winner
FITB
1.38
5Y Beta
Winner
LNG
0.37
FITB
0.94
Industry
LNG
Oil & Gas Midstream
FITB
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
Winner
LNG
-77.15
FITB
23.97
Forward P/E
LNG
15.13
Winner
FITB
12.82
Dividend Yield
LNG
0.94%
Winner
FITB
2.94%
5Y Dividends CAGR
LNG
N/A
FITB
12.43%
5Y EPS CAGR
LNG
N/A
FITB
2.52%
Debt to Equity
LNG
632.46%
Winner
FITB
58.76%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
LNG
4.60%
FITB
3.27%

LNG vs FITB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
LNG
-8.36%
Winner
FITB
+10.01%
3M
LNG
-14.52%
Winner
FITB
+21.17%
6M
Winner
LNG
+20.17%
FITB
+12.57%
1Y
LNG
-2.47%
Winner
FITB
+40.84%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
LNG
+23.39%
FITB
+11.47%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
LNG
+21.30%
FITB
+15.17%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
LNG
+20.09%
FITB
+3.17%

LNG vs FITB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearLNGFITB
2026+15.34%+11.49%
2025-11.06%+15.05%
2024+28.14%+26.06%
2023+22.73%+10.96%
2022+47.77%-23.88%
2021+72.70%+64.46%
2020-3.67%-6.21%
2019+1.45%+31.40%
2018+8.21%-20.55%
2017+27.13%+14.66%
2016+10.45%+41.72%
2015-47.77%+2.10%
2014+62.10%+0.01%
2013+121.13%+36.82%
2012+114.63%+19.14%
2011+35.36%-11.91%
2010+121.69%+45.50%
2009-19.60%+14.38%
2008-91.17%-64.59%
2007+16.61%-35.49%
2006-23.44%+12.55%
2005+20.14%-17.70%
2004+473.36%-17.02%
2003+800.00%-0.27%
2002+34.74%-3.02%
2001-57.98%+8.69%
2000-12.68%+30.13%
1999-20.88%+0.08%

LNG vs FITB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LNG was -97.84%, occurring on Oct 15, 2008. Recovery took 1913 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FITB was -98.13%, occurring on Feb 20, 2009. Recovery took 4795 trading sessions.

The current LNG drawdown is -23.36%. The current FITB drawdown is -3.64%.

RankLNGFITB
#1-97.84%
May 2, 2006 - Dec 5, 2013
-98.13%
Apr 12, 2002 - Apr 29, 2021
#2-86.11%
Feb 18, 2000 - Aug 18, 2003
-51.66%
Jan 14, 2022 - Oct 17, 2024
#3-72.00%
Sep 18, 2014 - May 24, 2021
-39.75%
Nov 16, 1999 - Sep 11, 2000
#4-53.19%
Nov 2, 1999 - Jan 26, 2000
-29.96%
Nov 25, 2024 - Dec 10, 2025
#5-41.98%
Jan 26, 2004 - Jun 23, 2004
-22.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Jun 4, 2001
#6-34.10%
Feb 3, 2005 - Sep 1, 2005
-21.21%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026
#7-28.06%
Oct 14, 2003 - Dec 22, 2003
-19.17%
Oct 5, 2000 - Dec 20, 2000
#8-25.37%
Jan 28, 2000 - Feb 8, 2000
-18.71%
May 17, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021
#9-24.87%
Jan 16, 2025 - Mar 6, 2026
-16.96%
Aug 22, 2001 - Mar 1, 2002
#10-24.09%
Mar 27, 2026 - May 29, 2026
-9.67%
Oct 20, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
#11-22.83%
Nov 1, 2022 - Nov 22, 2023
-6.19%
Sep 11, 2000 - Sep 26, 2000
#12-22.02%
Jun 25, 2004 - Oct 4, 2004
-6.00%
Jan 21, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026
#13-19.86%
Feb 8, 2000 - Feb 18, 2000
-5.60%
Oct 17, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
#14-18.70%
Oct 3, 2005 - Apr 19, 2006
-5.26%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 15, 1999
#15-17.82%
Mar 25, 2022 - Jul 29, 2022
-5.25%
Jun 21, 2001 - Jul 13, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between LNG and FITB is 0.67 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.67
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

LNG vs FITB dividend yield comparison.

YearLNGFITB
20260.49%0.76%
20251.06%3.29%
20240.84%3.41%
20230.95%3.94%
20220.92%3.84%
20210.33%2.62%
20200.00%3.92%
20190.00%3.06%
20180.00%3.14%
20170.00%1.98%
20160.00%1.97%
20150.00%2.59%
20140.00%2.50%
20130.00%2.23%
20120.00%2.37%
20110.00%2.20%
20100.00%0.27%
20090.00%0.41%
20080.00%9.08%
20070.00%6.76%
20060.00%3.86%
20050.00%3.87%
20040.00%2.77%
20030.00%1.91%
20020.00%1.67%
20010.00%1.35%
20000.00%1.17%
19990.00%0.33%

Select Stocks to Compare