LEN vs SQM
Comparison between Lennar Corp - Class A (LEN, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).
LEN is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed LEN, delivering a return of +12.5% compared to -2.2%
LEN vs SQM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LEN vs SQM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LEN vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LEN | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -19.96% | +0.53% |
| 2025 | -19.60% | +91.19% |
| 2024 | -6.32% | -38.56% |
| 2023 | +64.24% | -15.40% |
| 2022 | -17.55% | +70.49% |
| 2021 | +58.06% | +2.60% |
| 2020 | +37.95% | +87.42% |
| 2019 | +40.05% | -27.79% |
| 2018 | -39.44% | -35.04% |
| 2017 | +50.31% | +113.53% |
| 2016 | -7.76% | +61.04% |
| 2015 | +10.79% | -20.43% |
| 2014 | +14.14% | -1.99% |
| 2013 | -0.37% | -54.46% |
| 2012 | +95.54% | +7.62% |
| 2011 | +4.09% | -7.72% |
| 2010 | +45.57% | +53.00% |
| 2009 | +41.40% | +51.16% |
| 2008 | -47.89% | +46.55% |
| 2007 | -63.98% | +33.91% |
| 2006 | -15.37% | +23.39% |
| 2005 | +10.05% | +82.30% |
| 2004 | +22.26% | +52.01% |
| 2003 | +95.97% | +94.94% |
| 2002 | +11.43% | -8.87% |
| 2001 | +33.44% | +19.25% |
| 2000 | +127.96% | -10.37% |
| 1999 | -2.56% | +9.77% |
LEN vs SQM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LEN was -94.28%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 3101 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The current LEN drawdown is -54.33%. The current SQM drawdown is -29.40%.
| Rank | LEN | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -94.28% Jul 28, 2005 - Nov 20, 2017 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 |
| #2 | -58.81% Jan 19, 2018 - Jul 22, 2020 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #3 | -54.50% Sep 19, 2024 - May 15, 2026 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 |
| #4 | -44.35% Dec 10, 2021 - May 3, 2023 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 |
| #5 | -33.47% Jul 19, 2001 - Jan 17, 2002 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 |
| #6 | -30.12% Jul 1, 2002 - May 9, 2003 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 |
| #7 | -26.62% Mar 16, 2004 - Dec 15, 2004 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 |
| #8 | -22.39% Jul 14, 2023 - Dec 6, 2023 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 |
| #9 | -21.38% Apr 27, 2001 - Jul 11, 2001 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 |
| #10 | -19.26% Mar 31, 2000 - Jul 5, 2000 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #11 | -19.12% Jun 16, 2003 - Sep 30, 2003 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 |
| #12 | -18.75% Feb 25, 2005 - Jun 16, 2005 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 |
| #13 | -17.63% Dec 11, 2000 - Jan 10, 2001 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #14 | -17.06% Oct 15, 2020 - Jan 25, 2021 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 |
| #15 | -16.58% Mar 28, 2024 - Jul 19, 2024 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 |
Correlation
Correlation between LEN and SQM is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
LEN vs SQM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LEN | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.83% | 1.49% |
| 2025 | 1.95% | 0.18% |
| 2024 | 1.47% | 0.59% |
| 2023 | 1.01% | 8.34% |
| 2022 | 1.66% | 9.66% |
| 2021 | 0.86% | 3.92% |
| 2020 | 0.82% | 1.64% |
| 2019 | 0.29% | 4.55% |
| 2018 | 0.41% | 5.37% |
| 2017 | 0.25% | 2.73% |
| 2016 | 0.37% | 4.77% |
| 2015 | 0.33% | 2.00% |
| 2014 | 0.36% | 4.71% |
| 2013 | 0.40% | 3.21% |
| 2012 | 0.41% | 1.69% |
| 2011 | 0.81% | 1.40% |
| 2010 | 0.85% | 0.87% |
| 2009 | 1.25% | 2.70% |
| 2008 | 6.00% | 3.71% |
| 2007 | 3.58% | 2.01% |
| 2006 | 1.22% | 1.76% |
| 2005 | 0.94% | 1.49% |
| 2004 | 0.90% | 1.21% |
| 2003 | 5.77% | 1.20% |
| 2002 | 0.10% | 1.88% |
| 2001 | 0.11% | 2.16% |
| 2000 | 0.14% | 42.10% |
| 1999 | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks