StockComparison Logo
vs

LAMR vs RTO

Comparison between Lamar Advertising Co - Class A (LAMR, Company) and Rentokil Initial (RTO, Company).

LAMR is from the Real Estate sector, while RTO is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceLAMR has outperformed RTO, delivering a return of +12.9% compared to -0.6%

LAMR vs RTO - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
LAMR
$15B
Winner
RTO
$15B
Max Drawdown
LAMR
92.26%
Winner
RTO
87.38%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
LAMR
1.19
RTO
0.87
5Y Beta
LAMR
0.79
Winner
RTO
0.73
Industry
LAMR
Reit - Specialty
RTO
Specialty Business Services
P/E Ratio
LAMR
28.56
Winner
RTO
13.66
Forward P/E
LAMR
29.50
Winner
RTO
18.42
PEG Ratio
LAMR
3.97
Winner
RTO
0.27
Dividend Yield
Winner
LAMR
4.15%
RTO
2.06%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
LAMR
34.08%
RTO
12.75%
5Y EPS CAGR
LAMR
7.55%
RTO
N/A
Debt to Equity
LAMR
356.02%
Winner
RTO
111.54%
Free Cash Flow Yield
LAMR
4.58%
Winner
RTO
10.83%
P/S Ratio
LAMR
6.76
Winner
RTO
2.19
P/B Ratio
LAMR
15.58
Winner
RTO
2.76

LAMR vs RTO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
LAMR
+4.62%
RTO
-6.32%
3M
Winner
LAMR
+16.63%
RTO
-4.77%
6M
Winner
LAMR
+23.75%
RTO
+8.21%
1Y
Winner
LAMR
+33.77%
RTO
+31.42%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
LAMR
+12.94%
RTO
-0.61%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
LAMR
+14.39%
RTO
+10.49%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
LAMR
+6.38%
RTO
+4.84%

LAMR vs RTO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearLAMRRTO
2026+25.84%+3.90%
2025+10.31%+20.90%
2024+19.69%-5.45%
2023+21.94%-7.11%
2022-18.41%-21.80%
2021+56.85%+10.91%
2020-2.55%+18.47%
2019+39.36%+44.50%
2018-0.05%+2.83%
2017+14.38%+63.10%
2016+18.04%+19.30%
2015+17.05%+32.98%
2014+9.01%-0.42%
2013+30.69%+22.43%
2012+37.02%+59.12%
2011-32.40%-36.58%
2010+23.23%-18.85%
2009+121.12%+181.40%
2008-73.62%-71.04%
2007-22.79%-29.83%
2006+41.51%N/A
2005+8.26%N/A
2004+13.90%N/A
2003+4.07%N/A
2002-20.62%N/A
2001+15.49%N/A
2000-36.34%N/A
1999+8.38%N/A

LAMR vs RTO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LAMR was -91.85%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2262 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for RTO was -86.60%, occurring on Dec 4, 2008. Recovery took 2336 trading sessions.

The current LAMR drawdown is -2.27%. The current RTO drawdown is -22.49%.

RankLAMRRTO
#1-91.85%
Jan 11, 2007 - Jan 6, 2016
-86.60%
Nov 1, 2007 - Feb 13, 2017
#2-65.88%
Feb 20, 2020 - Mar 5, 2021
-50.87%
Nov 12, 2021 - Apr 7, 2025
#3-60.77%
Feb 4, 2000 - Jan 10, 2007
-42.03%
Mar 4, 2020 - Jul 14, 2020
#4-30.05%
Dec 30, 2021 - Feb 22, 2024
-23.45%
Jun 6, 2018 - Apr 4, 2019
#5-23.85%
Oct 15, 2024 - Nov 21, 2025
-19.60%
Oct 31, 2017 - May 21, 2018
#6-18.81%
Dec 14, 2017 - Aug 16, 2018
-13.39%
Jan 8, 2021 - Jul 29, 2021
#7-18.30%
Feb 21, 2017 - Nov 7, 2017
-12.62%
Nov 5, 2020 - Jan 8, 2021
#8-18.10%
Nov 7, 2018 - Mar 4, 2019
-11.27%
Jul 13, 2007 - Aug 31, 2007
#9-17.39%
Jan 6, 2016 - Mar 17, 2016
-9.98%
May 3, 2019 - Jul 3, 2019
#10-13.11%
Jul 22, 2016 - Dec 19, 2016
-8.87%
Jul 30, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
#11-12.55%
Nov 9, 2021 - Dec 29, 2021
-8.06%
Sep 22, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021
#12-11.63%
Jun 20, 2019 - Nov 15, 2019
-7.53%
Apr 17, 2017 - May 2, 2017
#13-11.43%
Dec 9, 1999 - Jan 25, 2000
-7.49%
Jul 24, 2019 - Aug 7, 2019
#14-11.34%
Jan 26, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
-6.43%
Mar 2, 2017 - Mar 16, 2017
#15-10.05%
Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
-6.39%
Feb 21, 2020 - Mar 3, 2020

Correlation

Correlation between LAMR and RTO is 0.84 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.84
-101

Dividend Comparison (2007 - 2026)

LAMR vs RTO dividend yield comparison.

YearLAMRRTO
20261.04%1.34%
20255.10%2.23%
20244.64%2.28%
20234.70%1.73%
20225.30%1.38%
20213.30%1.30%
20203.00%0.00%
20194.30%0.87%
20185.28%1.14%
20174.47%1.69%
20164.49%2.99%
20154.58%1.54%
20144.66%1.88%
20130.00%1.52%
20120.00%1.78%
20080.00%17.23%
20076.76%1.65%

Select Stocks to Compare