K vs NMR
Comparison between Kellanova Company (K, Company) and Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company).
K is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while NMR is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed K, delivering a return of +18.6% compared to +12.7%
K vs NMR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
K vs NMR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
K vs NMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | K | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | N/A | +18.06% |
| 2025 | +5.87% | +53.57% |
| 2024 | +44.96% | +35.63% |
| 2023 | -7.14% | +21.20% |
| 2022 | +13.89% | -12.30% |
| 2021 | +8.82% | -17.05% |
| 2020 | -4.76% | +3.34% |
| 2019 | +26.90% | +35.43% |
| 2018 | -13.33% | -36.95% |
| 2017 | -4.48% | -0.51% |
| 2016 | +5.73% | +10.26% |
| 2015 | +13.73% | +0.64% |
| 2014 | +10.80% | -23.82% |
| 2013 | +10.50% | +29.46% |
| 2012 | +14.44% | +92.81% |
| 2011 | +2.58% | -52.04% |
| 2010 | -0.32% | -14.33% |
| 2009 | +21.89% | -11.17% |
| 2008 | -12.68% | -49.10% |
| 2007 | +6.31% | -11.80% |
| 2006 | +17.25% | -1.99% |
| 2005 | -0.25% | +34.20% |
| 2004 | +21.01% | -14.69% |
| 2003 | +12.58% | +52.55% |
| 2002 | +17.75% | -13.30% |
| 2001 | +18.50% | -29.05% |
| 2000 | -8.53% | +2.57% |
| 1999 | -19.15% | +11.76% |
K vs NMR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for K was -44.73%, occurring on Feb 11, 2000. Recovery took 610 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current K drawdown is -0.01%. The current NMR drawdown is -51.09%.
| Rank | K | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -44.73% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 10, 2002 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 |
| #2 | -36.48% Sep 26, 2008 - Feb 2, 2010 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 |
| #3 | -34.67% Jul 19, 2016 - May 6, 2022 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 |
| #4 | -25.27% Oct 31, 2022 - Aug 5, 2024 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 |
| #5 | -22.11% Jun 5, 2002 - Nov 24, 2003 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 |
| #6 | -15.83% May 13, 2011 - Nov 20, 2012 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 |
| #7 | -15.31% Sep 18, 2007 - Aug 8, 2008 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 |
| #8 | -14.37% Jul 22, 2013 - Apr 3, 2014 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 |
| #9 | -13.78% Jun 4, 2014 - Jan 20, 2015 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 |
| #10 | -13.07% May 17, 2010 - Mar 3, 2011 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 |
| #11 | -10.86% Jan 22, 2015 - Aug 6, 2015 | N/A |
| #12 | -9.11% May 9, 2022 - Jul 29, 2022 | N/A |
| #13 | -8.42% Aug 19, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022 | N/A |
| #14 | -8.30% Oct 22, 2015 - Dec 15, 2015 | N/A |
| #15 | -7.66% Oct 28, 2005 - Apr 28, 2006 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between K and NMR is -0.56 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
K vs NMR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | K | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.53% |
| 2025 | 2.76% | 4.91% |
| 2024 | 2.79% | 4.29% |
| 2023 | 10.56% | 1.20% |
| 2022 | 3.28% | 3.86% |
| 2021 | 3.59% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 3.66% | 0.86% |
| 2019 | 3.27% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 3.86% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 3.12% | 1.70% |
| 2016 | 2.77% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 2.74% | 3.34% |
| 2014 | 2.90% | 2.44% |
| 2013 | 2.95% | 1.77% |
| 2012 | 3.12% | 1.28% |
| 2011 | 3.30% | 5.11% |
| 2010 | 3.05% | 1.37% |
| 2009 | 2.69% | 0.57% |
| 2008 | 2.96% | 2.85% |
| 2007 | 2.29% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.27% | 2.36% |
| 2005 | 2.45% | 1.07% |
| 2004 | 2.26% | 1.08% |
| 2003 | 2.65% | 1.03% |
| 2002 | 2.95% | 1.05% |
| 2001 | 3.36% | 5.57% |
| 2000 | 3.79% | 6.49% |
| 1999 | 0.80% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks