IRM vs TRI
Comparison between Iron Mountain Inc (IRM, Company) and Thomson-Reuters Corp (TRI, Company).
IRM is from the Real Estate sector, while TRI is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceIRM has outperformed TRI, delivering a return of +29.3% compared to -0.5%
IRM vs TRI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
IRM vs TRI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
IRM vs TRI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | IRM | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +54.17% | -31.28% |
| 2025 | -18.01% | -17.06% |
| 2024 | +57.51% | +12.82% |
| 2023 | +46.96% | +28.64% |
| 2022 | +1.94% | -0.97% |
| 2021 | +93.15% | +51.02% |
| 2020 | +5.56% | +15.80% |
| 2019 | +6.96% | +53.97% |
| 2018 | -7.72% | +14.09% |
| 2017 | +21.19% | +2.50% |
| 2016 | +28.26% | +22.07% |
| 2015 | -26.26% | -2.07% |
| 2014 | +53.68% | +13.45% |
| 2013 | -1.94% | +33.37% |
| 2012 | +15.95% | +12.37% |
| 2011 | +27.60% | -27.57% |
| 2010 | +10.94% | +17.92% |
| 2009 | -8.19% | +16.31% |
| 2008 | -31.13% | -26.04% |
| 2007 | +34.57% | -0.57% |
| 2006 | -1.69% | +22.33% |
| 2005 | +41.63% | +0.75% |
| 2004 | +16.64% | -2.37% |
| 2003 | +18.92% | +37.12% |
| 2002 | +11.94% | -12.38% |
| 2001 | +32.73% | N/A |
| 2000 | +4.04% | N/A |
| 1999 | +33.80% | N/A |
IRM vs TRI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for IRM was -55.71%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 1209 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TRI was -62.55%, occurring on May 14, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current IRM drawdown is -3.60%. The current TRI drawdown is -59.15%.
| Rank | IRM | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -55.71% Dec 26, 2007 - Oct 11, 2012 | -62.55% Jul 14, 2025 - May 14, 2026 |
| #2 | -39.05% Oct 28, 2024 - Apr 30, 2026 | -56.41% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2013 |
| #3 | -37.87% Nov 24, 2017 - Jan 26, 2021 | -35.36% Feb 19, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 |
| #4 | -36.43% Feb 5, 2015 - May 9, 2016 | -26.73% Jun 28, 2002 - May 20, 2003 |
| #5 | -36.42% Nov 9, 2005 - Feb 22, 2006 | -24.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Feb 13, 2023 |
| #6 | -34.78% May 15, 2002 - Nov 14, 2002 | -20.38% Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 3, 2018 |
| #7 | -34.76% May 10, 2013 - Sep 29, 2014 | -18.30% Jan 2, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 |
| #8 | -25.74% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 1, 2001 | -17.36% Oct 22, 2015 - Apr 26, 2016 |
| #9 | -23.16% Feb 22, 2006 - Aug 9, 2007 | -14.34% Jun 27, 2023 - Nov 17, 2023 |
| #10 | -22.91% Oct 27, 2004 - Aug 25, 2005 | -13.21% Feb 17, 2005 - Aug 10, 2005 |
| #11 | -22.77% Jul 26, 2016 - Aug 28, 2017 | -11.96% May 24, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 |
| #12 | -22.62% Apr 20, 2022 - Feb 2, 2023 | -11.63% Nov 14, 2013 - Jul 9, 2014 |
| #13 | -19.95% Dec 28, 2021 - Mar 23, 2022 | -11.24% Sep 19, 2005 - Feb 15, 2006 |
| #14 | -16.49% Mar 6, 2001 - Jun 8, 2001 | -11.20% Apr 15, 2015 - Oct 12, 2015 |
| #15 | -14.21% Apr 23, 2003 - Jan 6, 2004 | -10.65% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between IRM and TRI is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2002 - 2026)
IRM vs TRI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | IRM | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.68% | 3.22% |
| 2025 | 3.88% | 1.80% |
| 2024 | 2.60% | 1.35% |
| 2023 | 3.63% | 4.68% |
| 2022 | 4.96% | 1.56% |
| 2021 | 4.73% | 1.76% |
| 2020 | 8.39% | 1.86% |
| 2019 | 7.69% | 2.01% |
| 2018 | 7.32% | 2.87% |
| 2017 | 5.93% | 3.17% |
| 2016 | 6.17% | 3.11% |
| 2015 | 7.07% | 3.54% |
| 2014 | 13.88% | 4.51% |
| 2013 | 3.56% | 3.44% |
| 2012 | 16.49% | 4.41% |
| 2011 | 3.04% | 4.65% |
| 2010 | 1.50% | 3.11% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.47% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.77% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.80% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.12% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 2.28% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 3.18% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.33% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks