StockComparison Logo
vs

HYG vs LQD

Comparison between ISHARES IBOXX $ HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BOND ETF (HYG, ETF) and ISHARES IBOXX $ INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF (LQD, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceHYG has outperformed LQD, delivering a return of +3.7% compared to -0.1%

HYG vs LQD - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
HYG
$17B
Winner
LQD
$31B
Expense Ratio
HYG
0.49%
Winner
LQD
0.14%
Max Drawdown
HYG
41.90%
Winner
LQD
30.46%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
HYG
0.59
LQD
0.24
5Y Beta
HYG
0.24
Winner
LQD
0.14
5Y Dividends CAGR
HYG
3.61%
Winner
LQD
7.94%

HYG vs LQD - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
HYG
-0.10%
Winner
LQD
-0.06%
3M
Winner
HYG
+0.70%
LQD
-0.97%
6M
Winner
HYG
+1.33%
LQD
-0.17%
1Y
Winner
HYG
+6.20%
LQD
+5.20%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
HYG
+3.70%
LQD
-0.13%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
HYG
+4.86%
LQD
+2.50%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
HYG
+4.94%
LQD
+4.47%

HYG vs LQD - Annual Returns (2002 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearHYGLQD
2026+0.95%+0.07%
2025+8.34%+7.89%
2024+8.33%+1.55%
2023+11.32%+8.65%
2022-10.95%-17.05%
2021+3.96%-1.34%
2020+4.04%+10.74%
2019+14.24%+17.00%
2018-2.11%-3.14%
2017+5.63%+6.96%
2016+14.09%+6.27%
2015-5.03%-1.60%
2014+1.72%+8.00%
2013+4.77%-2.22%
2012+11.30%+10.67%
2011+6.68%+9.31%
2010+11.02%+8.75%
2009+28.98%+9.58%
2008-16.57%+1.20%
2007+1.62%+3.95%
2006N/A+3.65%
2005N/A+0.51%
2004N/A+6.48%
2003N/A+8.29%
2002N/A+9.86%

HYG vs LQD Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for HYG was -34.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 556 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LQD was -24.96%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current HYG drawdown is -0.59%. The current LQD drawdown is -4.13%.

RankHYGLQD
#1-34.28%
Sep 19, 2007 - Dec 2, 2009
-24.96%
Sep 22, 2021 - Oct 20, 2022
#2-22.03%
Feb 13, 2020 - Nov 4, 2020
-21.76%
Mar 6, 2020 - Jun 10, 2020
#3-15.79%
Dec 27, 2021 - Mar 7, 2024
-21.54%
May 1, 2008 - Jan 9, 2009
#4-13.44%
Apr 15, 2015 - Jul 8, 2016
-10.86%
Jan 9, 2009 - Jun 25, 2009
#5-10.05%
Jul 22, 2011 - Oct 24, 2011
-8.70%
Jun 13, 2003 - Mar 5, 2004
#6-8.38%
May 25, 2007 - Sep 18, 2007
-8.57%
May 1, 2013 - May 1, 2014
#7-7.90%
Oct 27, 2011 - Dec 23, 2011
-7.66%
Mar 17, 2004 - Sep 16, 2004
#8-7.07%
Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010
-6.64%
Dec 31, 2020 - Aug 3, 2021
#9-7.05%
May 8, 2013 - Nov 29, 2013
-6.03%
Feb 2, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016
#10-6.42%
Jun 25, 2014 - Apr 15, 2015
-5.86%
Sep 6, 2016 - Jun 14, 2017
#11-6.41%
Oct 1, 2018 - Jan 31, 2019
-5.63%
Dec 29, 2017 - Mar 12, 2019
#12-6.05%
Jan 8, 2010 - Mar 16, 2010
-5.23%
Nov 4, 2010 - May 5, 2011
#13-4.56%
May 18, 2011 - Jul 7, 2011
-4.85%
Aug 31, 2005 - Sep 19, 2006
#14-4.56%
Feb 28, 2025 - May 12, 2025
-4.66%
Nov 4, 2011 - Jan 17, 2012
#15-4.50%
May 2, 2012 - Jun 29, 2012
-4.34%
Sep 27, 2002 - Nov 7, 2002

Correlation

Correlation between HYG and LQD is 0.96 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.96
-101

Dividend Comparison (2002 - 2026)

HYG vs LQD dividend yield comparison.

YearHYGLQD
20262.52%1.92%
20255.71%4.48%
20246.01%4.45%
20235.74%3.99%
20225.30%3.30%
20214.02%2.30%
20204.88%2.66%
20194.99%3.29%
20185.54%3.67%
20175.12%3.10%
20165.27%3.34%
20155.90%3.47%
20145.69%3.39%
20136.10%3.83%
20126.60%3.83%
20117.51%4.39%
20108.25%4.87%
20099.48%5.50%
200810.08%5.37%
20075.23%5.45%
20060.00%5.04%
20050.00%4.76%
20040.00%4.66%
20030.00%4.96%
20020.00%2.26%

Select Stocks to Compare

More Comparisons

Compare with similar stocks

Popular suggestions: