HUM vs CLS

Comparison between Humana Inc (HUM, Company) and Celestica Inc (CLS, Company).

HUM is from the Healthcare sector, while CLS is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceCLS has outperformed HUM, delivering a return of +116.9% compared to -2.2%

HUM vs CLS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	HUM(COMPANY)	CLS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$43B	$43B
Max Drawdown	78.42%	96.93%
Sharpe Ratio	1.02	1.74
5Y Beta	0.40	2.40
Industry	Healthcare Plans	Electronic Components
P/E Ratio	13.71	55.17
Forward P/E	39.84	37.59
PEG Ratio	0.81	N/A
Dividend Yield	0.96%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	12.10%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	8.85%	N/A
Debt to Equity	75.31%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.93%	2.07%

Market Cap

Winner

HUM

$43B

CLS

$43B

Max Drawdown

Winner

HUM

78.42%

CLS

96.93%

Sharpe Ratio

HUM

1.02

Winner

CLS

1.74

5Y Beta

Winner

HUM

0.40

CLS

2.40

Industry

HUM

Healthcare Plans

CLS

Electronic Components

P/E Ratio

Winner

HUM

13.71

CLS

55.17

Forward P/E

HUM

39.84

Winner

CLS

37.59

PEG Ratio

HUM

0.81

CLS

N/A

Dividend Yield

HUM

0.96%

CLS

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

HUM

12.10%

CLS

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

HUM

8.85%

CLS

N/A

Debt to Equity

HUM

75.31%

Winner

CLS

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

HUM

2.93%

CLS

2.07%

HUM vs CLS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	HUM	CLS
1 month	+17.86%	+8.72%
3 months	+112.73%	+36.18%
6 months	+39.55%	+37.51%
1 year	+50.52%	+173.43%
5 years(CAGR)	-2.20%	+116.87%
10 years(CAGR)	+7.68%	+43.02%
Max(CAGR)	+16.28%	+10.10%

Winner

HUM

+17.86%

CLS

+8.72%

Winner

HUM

+112.73%

CLS

+36.18%

Winner

HUM

+39.55%

CLS

+37.51%

HUM

+50.52%

Winner

CLS

+173.43%

5Y(CAGR)

HUM

-2.20%

Winner

CLS

+116.87%

10Y(CAGR)

HUM

+7.68%

Winner

CLS

+43.02%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

HUM

+16.28%

CLS

+10.10%

HUM vs CLS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	HUM	CLS
2026	+37.08%	+23.20%
2025	+2.79%	+217.62%
2024	-45.42%	+226.49%
2023	-7.84%	+157.97%
2022	+10.77%	+0.54%
2021	+13.27%	+40.71%
2020	+13.71%	-3.12%
2019	+31.18%	-6.45%
2018	+14.62%	-17.26%
2017	+26.58%	-10.96%
2016	+14.05%	+8.62%
2015	+25.64%	-5.97%
2014	+40.88%	+13.76%
2013	+52.73%	+23.52%
2012	-21.24%	+6.54%
2011	+60.46%	-25.66%
2010	+19.83%	-1.22%
2009	+17.76%	+98.74%
2008	-52.28%	-20.38%
2007	+34.43%	-24.77%
2006	-0.84%	-26.39%
2005	+86.32%	-24.46%
2004	+29.48%	-8.97%
2003	+121.63%	-0.13%
2002	-13.04%	-65.90%
2001	-21.08%	-18.50%
2000	+101.64%	+1.88%
1999	+10.08%	+93.04%

HUM vs CLS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for HUM was -78.42%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 961 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLS was -96.93%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 6049 trading sessions.

The current HUM drawdown is -33.37%. The current CLS drawdown is -21.14%.

Rank	HUM	CLS
#1	-78.42% Jan 14, 2008 - Nov 3, 2011	-96.93% Oct 20, 2000 - Nov 7, 2024
#2	-69.92% Nov 3, 2022 - Mar 12, 2026	-53.96% Feb 5, 2025 - Jun 24, 2025
#3	-49.21% Jun 19, 2002 - Jul 28, 2003	-36.73% Mar 17, 2000 - Jul 14, 2000
#4	-48.65% Jan 13, 2000 - Sep 15, 2000	-33.23% Dec 29, 1999 - Mar 17, 2000
#5	-44.21% Dec 28, 2000 - Apr 18, 2002	-29.24% Nov 5, 2025 - Apr 13, 2026
#6	-43.60% Feb 13, 2020 - Apr 30, 2020	-29.13% Jan 22, 2025 - Jan 31, 2025
#7	-35.10% Jan 17, 2012 - Aug 8, 2013	-24.63% Sep 5, 2000 - Oct 20, 2000
#8	-34.96% Jan 26, 2004 - Nov 24, 2004	-23.18% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
#9	-33.95% Nov 7, 2018 - Dec 13, 2019	-19.68% Apr 27, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026
#10	-28.07% Jun 1, 2015 - Dec 1, 2016	-15.04% Aug 12, 2025 - Sep 4, 2025
#11	-27.60% Jan 5, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006	-13.67% Jul 20, 2000 - Aug 17, 2000
#12	-24.08% Oct 4, 2006 - Jul 18, 2007	-12.63% Dec 13, 1999 - Dec 17, 1999
#13	-22.68% Jul 23, 2021 - Jun 29, 2022	-9.30% Sep 23, 2025 - Oct 9, 2025
#14	-20.60% Nov 17, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000	-9.06% Nov 21, 2024 - Dec 5, 2024
#15	-18.18% Nov 22, 1999 - Jan 7, 2000	-7.23% Dec 6, 2024 - Dec 13, 2024