StockComparison Logo
vs

HUBB vs SQM

Comparison between Hubbell Inc (HUBB, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).

HUBB is from the Industrials sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceHUBB has outperformed SQM, delivering a return of +21.8% compared to +15.5%

HUBB vs SQM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
HUBB
$27B
Winner
SQM
$27B
Max Drawdown
Winner
HUBB
42.02%
SQM
80.45%
Sharpe Ratio
HUBB
1.22
Winner
SQM
2.22
5Y Beta
HUBB
1.21
Winner
SQM
1.03
Industry
HUBB
Electrical Equipment & Parts
SQM
Specialty Chemicals
P/E Ratio
Winner
HUBB
31.64
SQM
45.26
Forward P/E
HUBB
25.51
Winner
SQM
18.35
PEG Ratio
HUBB
3.47
Winner
SQM
0.57
Dividend Yield
HUBB
1.11%
Winner
SQM
1.13%
5Y Dividends CAGR
HUBB
7.71%
Winner
SQM
15.24%
5Y EPS CAGR
HUBB
17.78%
Winner
SQM
27.43%
Debt to Equity
Winner
HUBB
68.27%
SQM
84.60%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
HUBB
4.05%
SQM
1.64%
P/S Ratio
Winner
HUBB
4.43
SQM
5.83
P/B Ratio
HUBB
7.04
Winner
SQM
4.50

HUBB vs SQM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
HUBB
-6.58%
Winner
SQM
+12.05%
3M
HUBB
-2.42%
Winner
SQM
+29.89%
6M
HUBB
+7.15%
Winner
SQM
+89.61%
1Y
HUBB
+40.65%
Winner
SQM
+170.16%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
HUBB
+21.77%
SQM
+15.46%
10Y(CAGR)
HUBB
+19.25%
Winner
SQM
+21.00%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
HUBB
+18.89%
SQM
+18.62%

HUBB vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearHUBBSQM
2026+6.66%+32.54%
2025+7.16%+91.19%
2024+30.12%-38.56%
2023+42.52%-15.40%
2022+16.72%+70.49%
2021+36.23%+2.60%
2020+8.40%+87.42%
2019+53.34%-27.79%
2018-23.97%-35.04%
2017+17.86%+113.53%
2016+17.26%+61.04%
2015-0.37%-20.43%
2014N/A-1.99%
2013N/A-54.46%
2012N/A+7.62%
2011N/A-7.72%
2010N/A+53.00%
2009N/A+51.16%
2008N/A+46.55%
2007N/A+33.91%
2006N/A+23.39%
2005N/A+82.30%
2004N/A+52.01%
2003N/A+94.94%
2002N/A-8.87%
2001N/A+19.25%
2000N/A-10.37%
1999N/A+9.77%

HUBB vs SQM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for HUBB was -41.62%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 142 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.

The current HUBB drawdown is -11.71%. The current SQM drawdown is -6.92%.

RankHUBBSQM
#1-41.62%
Feb 11, 2020 - Sep 2, 2020
-78.36%
Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017
#2-32.65%
Nov 6, 2024 - Oct 29, 2025
-73.00%
Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021
#3-31.63%
Sep 21, 2018 - Sep 6, 2019
-72.14%
Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
#4-25.94%
Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 21, 2018
-69.81%
Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025
#5-19.77%
Jul 20, 2023 - Jan 30, 2024
-35.54%
Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002
#6-17.55%
Dec 29, 2021 - Jul 27, 2022
-31.32%
Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006
#7-16.47%
Dec 30, 2015 - Mar 18, 2016
-30.96%
Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021
#8-15.96%
Apr 3, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024
-29.41%
Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
#9-14.20%
Aug 30, 2021 - Nov 9, 2021
-27.46%
Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004
#10-13.86%
Nov 22, 2022 - Apr 25, 2023
-26.31%
May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
#11-13.80%
Oct 29, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026
-26.31%
Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008
#12-11.80%
May 6, 2021 - Jul 30, 2021
-24.67%
May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003
#13-11.71%
Apr 23, 2026 - May 8, 2026
-19.95%
Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
#14-11.57%
Feb 3, 2017 - Oct 24, 2017
-19.89%
Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022
#15-11.40%
Sep 2, 2020 - Oct 22, 2020
-19.15%
Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between HUBB and SQM is 0.54 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.54
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

HUBB vs SQM dividend yield comparison.

YearHUBBSQM
20260.29%1.13%
20251.21%0.18%
20241.19%0.59%
20231.39%8.34%
20221.82%9.66%
20211.92%3.92%
20202.37%1.64%
20192.32%4.55%
20183.17%5.37%
20172.12%2.73%
20162.22%4.77%
20150.00%2.00%
20140.00%4.71%
20130.00%3.21%
20120.00%1.69%
20110.00%1.40%
20100.00%0.87%
20090.00%2.70%
20080.00%3.71%
20070.00%2.01%
20060.00%1.76%
20050.00%1.49%
20040.00%1.21%
20030.00%1.20%
20020.00%1.88%
20010.00%2.16%
20000.00%42.10%

Select Stocks to Compare