StockComparison Logo
vs

HL-P-B vs CCJ

Comparison between Hecla Mining Company (HL-P-B, Company) and Cameco Corp (CCJ, Company).

5-Year PerformanceCCJ has outperformed HL-P-B, delivering a return of +37.3% compared to +9.6%

HL-P-B vs CCJ - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
HL-P-B
$47B
CCJ
$47B
Max Drawdown
HL-P-B
92.42%
Winner
CCJ
90.11%
Sharpe Ratio
HL-P-B
0.88
Winner
CCJ
1.19
5Y Beta
Winner
HL-P-B
0.12
CCJ
1.48
Industry
HL-P-B
Other
CCJ
Uranium
P/E Ratio
HL-P-B
146.28
Winner
CCJ
98.57
Forward P/E
HL-P-B
N/A
CCJ
91.74
PEG Ratio
Winner
HL-P-B
0.01
CCJ
0.57
Dividend Yield
HL-P-B
N/A
CCJ
0.21%
5Y Dividends CAGR
HL-P-B
0.00%
Winner
CCJ
23.04%
Debt to Equity
Winner
HL-P-B
0.00%
CCJ
14.11%
Free Cash Flow Yield
HL-P-B
0.66%
Winner
CCJ
1.41%
P/S Ratio
HL-P-B
N/A
CCJ
13.23
P/B Ratio
HL-P-B
N/A
CCJ
9.15

HL-P-B vs CCJ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
HL-P-B
+2.52%
CCJ
-9.66%
3M
Winner
HL-P-B
-2.78%
CCJ
-9.48%
6M
HL-P-B
+11.87%
Winner
CCJ
+13.30%
1Y
HL-P-B
+38.54%
Winner
CCJ
+72.59%
5Y(CAGR)
HL-P-B
+9.58%
Winner
CCJ
+37.33%
10Y(CAGR)
HL-P-B
+8.06%
Winner
CCJ
+25.25%
Max(CAGR)
HL-P-B
+9.14%
Winner
CCJ
+16.16%

HL-P-B vs CCJ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearHL-P-BCCJ
2026-3.48%+4.92%
2025+43.01%+75.75%
2024+4.03%+22.48%
2023+0.10%+88.26%
2022+6.53%+0.21%
2021+1.30%+63.29%
2020+21.07%+50.79%
2019+1.26%-21.36%
2018+8.38%+17.72%
2017+2.16%-7.65%
2016+6.13%-9.70%
2015+13.90%-22.35%
2014+5.03%-17.55%
2013N/A+4.77%
2012N/A+7.12%
2011N/A-54.76%
2010N/A+22.69%
2009N/A+67.88%
2008N/A-57.86%
2007N/A+1.71%
2006N/A+19.51%
2005N/A+91.08%
2004N/A+79.66%
2003N/A+139.47%
2002N/A-0.58%
2001N/A+46.91%
2000N/A+19.86%
1999N/A-9.23%

HL-P-B vs CCJ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for HL-P-B was -91.82%, occurring on Oct 20, 2017. Recovery took 356 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CCJ was -87.53%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 4132 trading sessions.

The current HL-P-B drawdown is -33.78%. The current CCJ drawdown is -22.88%.

RankHL-P-BCCJ
#1-91.82%
Aug 5, 2016 - Jan 4, 2018		-87.53%
Jun 15, 2007 - Nov 13, 2023
#2-37.25%
Jan 26, 2026 - Mar 26, 2026		-47.40%
Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 2, 2003
#3-24.31%
Mar 6, 2020 - Apr 13, 2020		-40.14%
Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 8, 2000
#4-21.02%
Feb 14, 2022 - Jul 28, 2023		-40.01%
Dec 5, 2024 - Jun 9, 2025
#5-20.13%
Jul 28, 2023 - Sep 22, 2025		-33.53%
May 31, 2024 - Oct 16, 2024
#6-17.29%
Jan 4, 2018 - Feb 12, 2019		-30.79%
May 21, 2001 - Feb 8, 2002
#7-16.37%
Feb 12, 2019 - Jan 8, 2020		-28.35%
May 10, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007
#8-13.86%
Jul 13, 2015 - Feb 10, 2016		-27.84%
Jan 5, 2004 - Jul 14, 2004
#9-12.73%
Jul 17, 2020 - Jan 4, 2021		-25.69%
Oct 28, 2025 - Jan 9, 2026
#10-11.49%
Dec 14, 2021 - Jan 14, 2022		-24.56%
Mar 18, 2005 - Jul 19, 2005
#11-11.23%
Jan 13, 2021 - Mar 25, 2021		-24.27%
Jan 28, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026
#12-10.28%
Dec 19, 2025 - Jan 14, 2026		-21.74%
Feb 1, 2024 - May 6, 2024
#13-9.70%
Jul 27, 2016 - Aug 5, 2016		-15.25%
Jan 31, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006
#14-9.14%
May 20, 2015 - Jun 29, 2015		-14.91%
Dec 12, 2000 - Jan 9, 2001
#15-8.20%
Jun 13, 2016 - Jul 25, 2016		-14.21%
Oct 4, 2005 - Nov 21, 2005

Correlation

Correlation between HL-P-B and CCJ is 0.88 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.88
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

HL-P-B vs CCJ dividend yield comparison.

YearHL-P-BCCJ
20261.29%0.00%
20254.93%0.19%
20246.62%0.22%
20236.43%0.20%
20226.03%0.39%
20216.14%0.29%
20205.97%0.46%
20196.73%0.67%
20186.38%0.53%
20176.60%4.33%
20166.33%3.82%
20156.33%3.24%
20141.69%2.44%
20130.00%1.93%
20120.00%2.03%
20110.00%2.22%
20100.00%0.69%
20090.00%0.75%
20080.00%1.39%
20070.00%0.50%
20060.00%0.38%
20050.00%0.36%
20040.00%0.57%
20030.00%1.04%
20020.00%2.08%
20010.00%2.02%
20000.00%2.60%
19990.00%0.82%

Select Stocks to Compare

Popular: HL-P-B vs SPYCCJ vs SPY