StockComparison Logo
vs

CCJ vs GRMN

Comparison between Cameco Corp (CCJ, Company) and Garmin Ltd (GRMN, Company).

CCJ is from the Energy sector, while GRMN is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceCCJ has outperformed GRMN, delivering a return of +40.3% compared to +13.9%

CCJ vs GRMN - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CCJ
$45B
Winner
GRMN
$46B
Max Drawdown
CCJ
90.11%
Winner
GRMN
87.75%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CCJ
1.47
GRMN
0.69
5Y Beta
CCJ
1.44
Winner
GRMN
1.10
Industry
CCJ
Uranium
GRMN
Scientific & Technical Instruments
P/E Ratio
CCJ
95.38
Winner
GRMN
26.35
Forward P/E
CCJ
90.91
Winner
GRMN
25.00
PEG Ratio
Winner
CCJ
0.55
GRMN
1.45
Dividend Yield
CCJ
0.23%
Winner
GRMN
1.77%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CCJ
23.04%
GRMN
7.64%
5Y EPS CAGR
CCJ
N/A
GRMN
11.05%
Debt to Equity
CCJ
14.11%
Winner
GRMN
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CCJ
1.45%
Winner
GRMN
3.17%
P/S Ratio
CCJ
12.97
Winner
GRMN
6.14
P/B Ratio
CCJ
8.81
Winner
GRMN
4.76

CCJ vs GRMN - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CCJ
-17.17%
Winner
GRMN
-9.71%
3M
CCJ
-11.79%
Winner
GRMN
-2.21%
6M
Winner
CCJ
+32.12%
GRMN
+26.25%
1Y
Winner
CCJ
+98.74%
GRMN
+21.38%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CCJ
+40.33%
GRMN
+13.89%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CCJ
+25.83%
GRMN
+22.77%
Max(CAGR)
CCJ
+16.24%
Winner
GRMN
+16.59%

CCJ vs GRMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCCJGRMN
2026+6.28%+19.36%
2025+75.75%+0.77%
2024+22.48%+65.84%
2023+88.26%+41.13%
2022+0.21%-28.81%
2021+63.29%+16.75%
2020+50.79%+24.79%
2019-21.36%+60.15%
2018+17.72%+9.89%
2017-7.65%+25.77%
2016-9.70%+37.97%
2015-22.35%-25.72%
2014-17.55%+21.67%
2013+4.77%+16.24%
2012+7.12%+9.09%
2011-54.76%+39.94%
2010+22.69%+0.27%
2009+67.88%+44.43%
2008-57.86%-78.27%
2007+1.71%+75.54%
2006+19.51%+66.91%
2005+91.08%+13.62%
2004+79.66%+14.29%
2003+139.47%+83.34%
2002-0.58%+37.88%
2001+46.91%+10.75%
2000+19.86%-1.25%
1999-9.23%N/A

CCJ vs GRMN Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CCJ was -87.53%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 4132 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for GRMN was -87.71%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2846 trading sessions.

The current CCJ drawdown is -21.88%. The current GRMN drawdown is -10.02%.

RankCCJGRMN
#1-87.53%
Jun 15, 2007 - Nov 13, 2023
-87.71%
Oct 29, 2007 - Feb 20, 2019
#2-47.40%
Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 2, 2003
-54.62%
Aug 30, 2021 - May 6, 2024
#3-40.14%
Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 8, 2000
-51.02%
Jan 8, 2004 - Nov 26, 2004
#4-40.01%
Dec 5, 2024 - Jun 9, 2025
-42.70%
Feb 8, 2001 - Dec 2, 2002
#5-33.53%
May 31, 2024 - Oct 16, 2024
-38.17%
Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 5, 2020
#6-30.79%
May 21, 2001 - Feb 8, 2002
-36.29%
Dec 28, 2004 - Sep 9, 2005
#7-28.35%
May 10, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007
-27.98%
Feb 19, 2025 - Aug 28, 2025
#8-27.84%
Jan 5, 2004 - Jul 14, 2004
-27.97%
Oct 8, 2025 - Apr 13, 2026
#9-25.69%
Oct 28, 2025 - Jan 9, 2026
-27.88%
Jun 6, 2003 - Oct 29, 2003
#10-24.56%
Mar 18, 2005 - Jul 19, 2005
-22.40%
Oct 3, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006
#11-24.27%
Jan 28, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026
-21.56%
Jun 29, 2006 - Oct 26, 2006
#12-21.74%
Feb 1, 2024 - May 6, 2024
-20.32%
Sep 27, 2007 - Oct 24, 2007
#13-15.25%
Jan 31, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006
-19.77%
Dec 11, 2000 - Feb 2, 2001
#14-14.91%
Dec 12, 2000 - Jan 9, 2001
-18.02%
Oct 26, 2006 - Dec 15, 2006
#15-14.21%
Oct 4, 2005 - Nov 21, 2005
-15.61%
Apr 20, 2026 - May 15, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between CCJ and GRMN is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.75
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CCJ vs GRMN dividend yield comparison.

YearCCJGRMN
20260.00%0.37%
20250.19%1.70%
20240.22%1.44%
20230.20%2.27%
20220.39%3.10%
20210.29%1.92%
20200.46%2.01%
20190.67%2.30%
20180.53%3.32%
20174.33%3.42%
20163.82%4.21%
20153.24%5.41%
20142.44%3.58%
20131.93%4.87%
20122.03%6.26%
20112.22%8.04%
20100.69%4.84%
20090.75%2.44%
20081.39%3.91%
20070.50%0.77%
20060.38%0.90%
20050.36%0.75%
20040.57%0.82%
20031.04%0.92%
20022.08%0.00%
20012.02%0.00%
20002.60%0.00%
19990.82%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare