StockComparison Logo
vs

HAS vs LFUS

Comparison between Hasbro Inc (HAS, Company) and Littelfuse Inc (LFUS, Company).

HAS is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while LFUS is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceLFUS has outperformed HAS, delivering a return of +14.7% compared to +1.8%

HAS vs LFUS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
HAS
$12B
LFUS
$12B
Max Drawdown
Winner
HAS
65.99%
LFUS
82.44%
Sharpe Ratio
HAS
0.71
Winner
LFUS
2.06
5Y Beta
Winner
HAS
0.91
LFUS
1.54
Industry
HAS
Leisure
LFUS
Electronic Components
P/E Ratio
Winner
HAS
-35.83
LFUS
46.97
Forward P/E
Winner
HAS
14.27
LFUS
33.00
PEG Ratio
HAS
N/A
LFUS
2.77
Dividend Yield
Winner
HAS
3.32%
LFUS
0.60%
5Y Dividends CAGR
HAS
0.58%
Winner
LFUS
14.02%
5Y EPS CAGR
HAS
N/A
LFUS
6.84%
Debt to Equity
HAS
532.76%
Winner
LFUS
25.12%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
HAS
8.71%
LFUS
3.35%

HAS vs LFUS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
HAS
-4.69%
Winner
LFUS
+0.70%
3M
HAS
-9.32%
Winner
LFUS
+31.76%
6M
HAS
+3.57%
Winner
LFUS
+78.65%
1Y
HAS
+18.59%
Winner
LFUS
+109.56%
5Y(CAGR)
HAS
+1.77%
Winner
LFUS
+14.68%
10Y(CAGR)
HAS
+3.53%
Winner
LFUS
+15.95%
Max(CAGR)
HAS
+8.24%
Winner
LFUS
+12.76%

HAS vs LFUS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearHASLFUS
2026+1.90%+77.28%
2025+51.14%+9.09%
2024+17.47%-9.02%
2023-13.38%+21.19%
2022-38.17%-29.67%
2021+13.81%+25.78%
2020-8.17%+32.98%
2019+35.54%+13.61%
2018-9.41%-12.83%
2017+16.58%+32.24%
2016+19.06%+48.51%
2015+25.76%+13.16%
2014+4.01%+7.22%
2013+57.39%+49.56%
2012+17.18%+38.70%
2011-29.70%-10.07%
2010+48.55%+40.62%
2009+11.62%+86.16%
2008+19.53%-51.02%
2007-5.04%+5.24%
2006+39.17%+14.10%
2005+7.45%-19.02%
2004-6.76%+19.07%
2003+84.48%+66.11%
2002-28.05%-33.80%
2001+58.79%+4.96%
2000-41.10%+16.86%
1999-7.09%+9.08%

HAS vs LFUS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for HAS was -63.83%, occurring on Mar 16, 2020. Recovery took 1643 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LFUS was -82.44%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2646 trading sessions.

The current HAS drawdown is -20.19%. The current LFUS drawdown is -5.20%.

RankHASLFUS
#1-63.83%
Jul 29, 2019 - Feb 10, 2026
-82.44%
Jun 29, 2000 - Jan 6, 2011
#2-60.31%
Nov 16, 1999 - Nov 4, 2003
-54.17%
Jun 20, 2018 - Nov 16, 2020
#3-46.94%
Aug 8, 2008 - Mar 29, 2010
-53.29%
Nov 17, 2021 - Jan 29, 2026
#4-34.53%
Dec 7, 2010 - Apr 22, 2013
-40.12%
May 2, 2011 - Apr 2, 2012
#5-33.46%
May 9, 2007 - Apr 21, 2008
-21.61%
Apr 2, 2012 - Jan 23, 2013
#6-30.23%
Jul 21, 2017 - Jul 23, 2019
-19.75%
Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 10, 2026
#7-26.66%
Apr 6, 2004 - Sep 28, 2006
-18.54%
Apr 16, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014
#8-21.14%
Feb 11, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
-18.17%
Mar 2, 2015 - Nov 2, 2015
#9-20.54%
Jul 20, 2015 - Apr 15, 2016
-17.23%
Nov 9, 2015 - Feb 23, 2016
#10-13.13%
Nov 4, 2003 - Mar 3, 2004
-17.03%
Mar 29, 2000 - May 30, 2000
#11-12.93%
Jun 5, 2008 - Jul 23, 2008
-16.40%
Mar 16, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018
#12-12.31%
Nov 28, 2014 - Feb 9, 2015
-15.89%
Jan 20, 2021 - Aug 27, 2021
#13-12.20%
May 31, 2016 - Nov 14, 2016
-15.46%
Nov 12, 1999 - Dec 30, 1999
#14-11.89%
Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 25, 2014
-13.00%
Mar 29, 2016 - Jul 27, 2016
#15-11.74%
Nov 25, 2016 - Feb 6, 2017
-12.91%
Oct 24, 2017 - Nov 21, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between HAS and LFUS is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.89
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

HAS vs LFUS dividend yield comparison.

YearHASLFUS
20261.68%0.32%
20253.41%1.15%
20245.01%1.15%
20235.48%0.93%
20224.56%1.03%
20212.67%0.64%
20202.91%0.75%
20192.53%0.95%
20183.03%0.93%
20172.44%0.71%
20162.56%0.82%
20152.69%1.01%
20143.07%0.97%
20132.18%0.90%
20124.85%1.23%
20113.61%1.54%
20102.01%0.32%
20092.50%0.00%
20082.61%0.00%
20072.35%0.00%
20061.65%0.00%
20051.64%0.00%
20041.08%0.00%
20030.56%0.00%
20021.04%0.00%
20010.74%0.00%
20002.26%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare