LFUS vs TRMB

Comparison between Littelfuse Inc (LFUS, Company) and Trimble Inc (TRMB, Company).

Both LFUS and TRMB are from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceLFUS has outperformed TRMB, delivering a return of +14.7% compared to -9.0%

LFUS vs TRMB - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	LFUS(COMPANY)	TRMB(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$12B	$12B
Max Drawdown	82.44%	87.23%
Sharpe Ratio	2.06	-1.25
5Y Beta	1.54	1.31
Industry	Electronic Components	Scientific & Technical Instruments
P/E Ratio	46.97	25.93
Forward P/E	33.00	13.72
PEG Ratio	2.77	N/A
Dividend Yield	0.60%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	14.02%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	6.84%	1.84%
Debt to Equity	25.12%	25.06%
Free Cash Flow Yield	3.35%	4.14%

Market Cap

Winner

LFUS

$12B

TRMB

$12B

Max Drawdown

Winner

LFUS

82.44%

TRMB

87.23%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

LFUS

2.06

TRMB

-1.25

5Y Beta

LFUS

1.54

Winner

TRMB

1.31

Industry

LFUS

Electronic Components

TRMB

Scientific & Technical Instruments

P/E Ratio

LFUS

46.97

Winner

TRMB

25.93

Forward P/E

LFUS

33.00

Winner

TRMB

13.72

PEG Ratio

LFUS

2.77

TRMB

N/A

Dividend Yield

LFUS

0.60%

TRMB

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

LFUS

14.02%

TRMB

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

LFUS

6.84%

TRMB

1.84%

Debt to Equity

LFUS

25.12%

Winner

TRMB

25.06%

Free Cash Flow Yield

LFUS

3.35%

Winner

TRMB

4.14%

LFUS vs TRMB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	LFUS	TRMB
1 month	+0.70%	-11.00%
3 months	+31.76%	-23.31%
6 months	+78.65%	-37.33%
1 year	+109.56%	-31.98%
5 years(CAGR)	+14.68%	-9.03%
10 years(CAGR)	+15.95%	+6.78%
Max(CAGR)	+12.76%	+11.48%

Winner

LFUS

+0.70%

TRMB

-11.00%

Winner

LFUS

+31.76%

TRMB

-23.31%

Winner

LFUS

+78.65%

TRMB

-37.33%

Winner

LFUS

+109.56%

TRMB

-31.98%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

LFUS

+14.68%

TRMB

-9.03%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

LFUS

+15.95%

TRMB

+6.78%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

LFUS

+12.76%

TRMB

+11.48%

LFUS vs TRMB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	LFUS	TRMB
2026	+77.28%	-35.99%
2025	+9.09%	+12.39%
2024	-9.02%	+34.72%
2023	+21.19%	+5.14%
2022	-29.67%	-41.67%
2021	+25.78%	+31.53%
2020	+32.98%	+59.20%
2019	+13.61%	+28.40%
2018	-12.83%	-19.85%
2017	+32.24%	+34.26%
2016	+48.51%	+39.65%
2015	+13.16%	-20.29%
2014	+7.22%	-22.94%
2013	+49.56%	+12.81%
2012	+38.70%	+43.60%
2011	-10.07%	+6.79%
2010	+40.62%	+55.67%
2009	+86.16%	+13.00%
2008	-51.02%	-27.21%
2007	+5.24%	+17.28%
2006	+14.10%	+40.68%
2005	-19.02%	+9.77%
2004	+19.07%	+34.97%
2003	+66.11%	+184.49%
2002	-33.80%	-22.85%
2001	+4.96%	-29.52%
2000	+16.86%	-3.54%
1999	+9.08%	+30.06%

LFUS vs TRMB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for LFUS was -82.44%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2646 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for TRMB was -87.23%, occurring on Oct 7, 2002. Recovery took 1256 trading sessions.

The current LFUS drawdown is -5.20%. The current TRMB drawdown is -47.62%.

Rank	LFUS	TRMB
#1	-82.44% Jun 29, 2000 - Jan 6, 2011	-87.23% Jul 18, 2000 - Jul 19, 2005
#2	-54.17% Jun 20, 2018 - Nov 16, 2020	-71.92% Oct 23, 2007 - Jan 14, 2011
#3	-53.29% Nov 17, 2021 - Jan 29, 2026	-59.66% Mar 6, 2014 - Sep 19, 2017
#4	-40.12% May 2, 2011 - Apr 2, 2012	-57.35% Aug 30, 2021 - Nov 13, 2023
#5	-21.61% Apr 2, 2012 - Jan 23, 2013	-53.78% Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 6, 2020
#6	-19.75% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 10, 2026	-39.04% Mar 7, 2000 - May 1, 2000
#7	-18.54% Apr 16, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014	-37.49% Apr 4, 2011 - Mar 13, 2012
#8	-18.17% Mar 2, 2015 - Nov 2, 2015	-35.88% Jul 20, 2005 - Mar 22, 2006
#9	-17.23% Nov 9, 2015 - Feb 23, 2016	-33.10% Jan 23, 2018 - Jun 28, 2019
#10	-17.03% Mar 29, 2000 - May 30, 2000	-27.42% Mar 27, 2012 - Nov 29, 2012
#11	-16.40% Mar 16, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018	-23.63% Jan 3, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000
#12	-15.89% Jan 20, 2021 - Aug 27, 2021	-21.81% Jan 25, 2013 - Nov 1, 2013
#13	-15.46% Nov 12, 1999 - Dec 30, 1999	-21.27% Jul 3, 2019 - Feb 19, 2020
#14	-13.00% Mar 29, 2016 - Jul 27, 2016	-18.88% May 5, 2006 - Aug 3, 2006
#15	-12.91% Oct 24, 2017 - Nov 21, 2017	-15.55% Dec 28, 1999 - Jan 3, 2000