GRFS vs WTM
Comparison between Grifols SA (GRFS, Company) and White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd (WTM, Company).
GRFS is from the Healthcare sector, while WTM is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceWTM has outperformed GRFS, delivering a return of +12.3% compared to -14.4%
GRFS vs WTM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GRFS vs WTM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GRFS vs WTM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GRFS | WTM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -11.36% | +5.09% |
| 2025 | +26.06% | +7.78% |
| 2024 | -32.67% | +28.89% |
| 2023 | +32.27% | +7.82% |
| 2022 | -26.98% | +40.13% |
| 2021 | -39.47% | +0.02% |
| 2020 | -21.16% | -10.78% |
| 2019 | +31.32% | +30.61% |
| 2018 | -19.94% | +1.26% |
| 2017 | +44.23% | +0.31% |
| 2016 | +2.30% | +16.25% |
| 2015 | -3.95% | +15.17% |
| 2014 | -1.76% | +5.05% |
| 2013 | +42.07% | +15.41% |
| 2012 | +158.95% | +13.20% |
| 2011 | -12.53% | +32.29% |
| 2010 | N/A | +0.31% |
| 2009 | N/A | +27.07% |
| 2008 | N/A | -46.61% |
| 2007 | N/A | -10.07% |
| 2006 | N/A | +5.94% |
| 2005 | N/A | -10.36% |
| 2004 | N/A | +42.59% |
| 2003 | N/A | +42.62% |
| 2002 | N/A | -7.44% |
| 2001 | N/A | +10.58% |
| 2000 | N/A | +172.82% |
| 1999 | N/A | -4.04% |
GRFS vs WTM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GRFS was -78.00%, occurring on Mar 6, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for WTM was -77.48%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2327 trading sessions.
The current GRFS drawdown is -66.52%. The current WTM drawdown is -7.53%.
| Rank | GRFS | WTM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.00% Feb 21, 2020 - Mar 6, 2024 | -77.48% Sep 8, 2005 - Dec 5, 2014 |
| #2 | -38.75% Jul 21, 2011 - Feb 2, 2012 | -40.16% Feb 11, 2020 - Feb 10, 2021 |
| #3 | -37.14% Jun 9, 2014 - Jun 21, 2017 | -27.02% Jun 21, 2001 - May 12, 2003 |
| #4 | -28.71% Jun 12, 2018 - Jan 7, 2020 | -22.07% Feb 22, 2021 - Jun 7, 2022 |
| #5 | -19.20% Jan 16, 2018 - Jun 12, 2018 | -18.77% Nov 1, 1999 - Mar 14, 2000 |
| #6 | -16.59% Apr 30, 2013 - Jul 25, 2013 | -18.05% Nov 25, 2024 - Nov 26, 2025 |
| #7 | -16.32% May 3, 2012 - Jul 3, 2012 | -16.59% Mar 1, 2017 - Sep 14, 2018 |
| #8 | -14.48% Mar 12, 2014 - Jun 5, 2014 | -16.37% Mar 11, 2005 - Aug 19, 2005 |
| #9 | -12.71% Aug 2, 2013 - Nov 21, 2013 | -15.67% Apr 6, 2004 - Nov 18, 2004 |
| #10 | -11.16% Jun 22, 2017 - Oct 31, 2017 | -15.54% Sep 8, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022 |
| #11 | -9.82% Nov 2, 2012 - Dec 21, 2012 | -14.93% Feb 17, 2023 - Jul 20, 2023 |
| #12 | -9.72% Jul 31, 2012 - Sep 21, 2012 | -14.80% Sep 14, 2018 - May 31, 2019 |
| #13 | -9.54% Jun 2, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 | -13.91% Jun 16, 2003 - Oct 3, 2003 |
| #14 | -9.35% Nov 3, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018 | -13.43% Nov 30, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 |
| #15 | -8.56% Jan 10, 2020 - Feb 18, 2020 | -12.42% Sep 29, 2000 - Nov 10, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between GRFS and WTM is -0.33 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
GRFS vs WTM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GRFS | WTM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| 2025 | 1.88% | 0.05% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| 2021 | 3.20% | 0.10% |
| 2020 | 0.83% | 0.10% |
| 2019 | 1.55% | 0.09% |
| 2018 | 2.32% | 0.12% |
| 2017 | 1.24% | 0.12% |
| 2016 | 1.67% | 0.12% |
| 2015 | 2.01% | 0.14% |
| 2014 | 1.32% | 0.16% |
| 2013 | 0.60% | 0.17% |
| 2012 | 4.50% | 0.19% |
| 2011 | 9.37% | 0.22% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.30% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.30% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.56% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.38% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 0.15% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.22% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.31% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.29% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.33% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks